Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› Ideation and AI

Ideation and AI

by Rich Nadworny
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A recent study published in the Wall Street Journal by Wharton professors Christian Terwiesch and Karl Ulrich tested whether MBA students or ChatGPT was better at generating ideas. They tested both the quantity of ideas and the quality of ideas. In both cases, ChatGPT greatly outperformed the Wharton MBA students. Their recommendations of combining human-AI collaboration are a smart one worth considering. You can read the article here.

I’m not surprised by their findings at all. One thing I notice over and over again when practicing ideation techniques with clients is that almost everyone, especially the designers and innovation leads running these sessions, usually comes away from ideation work with the feeling that the ideas weren’t that great and that no one came up with anything new. The only surprising thing in these reactions is that people are surprised.

I’ve been working in creative fields for a long time. It is really, really hard to come up with great ideas. Asking people to do this on the spot, while they spend most of their working hours NOT coming up with brilliant ideas, will rarely, if ever work. Creating great ideas takes a lot of practice, and generating hundreds of ideas takes a lot of time, practice, and time we rarely get.

To be brutally honest, most service designers and innovation leads I’ve worked with over the last several years (not all, but most) are themselves not very good and developing great ideas, even though they are quick to judge others. This is probably due to the fact that they also spend most of their time on other parts of the design process than ideating and testing.

Using ChatGPT for ideating is a worthwhile idea that designers and innovation leads should embrace. It is a solid training tool for people new to design and innovation in that it starts helping them recognize what a) lots of ideas (even bad ones) look like and b) what some really good ideas might look like.

An example of using ChatGPT in the ideation process might look like this:

1. Go through a robust ideation session with your team (or your class) and have them generate as many ideas as possible based on your reframes or insights.

2. After, have them use ChatGPT to generate 100 new ideas using the same prompts.

3. Let the team then prioritize the best ideas and test them. Make sure there is a representative sample, at least, from both groups.

4. Use the testing to figure out where the best ideas came from and keep honing them in the process.

5. Use ChatGPT in the 2nd and 3rd rounds of ideation to see if your team can find that breakthrough idea.

I’ve been doing this recently in my own projects with good results.

The best ideators I’ve worked with were from my work in branding and advertising since the copywriters, art directors, digital designers, and PR pros spent most of their days trying to come up with interesting ideas that would break through the noise. In their workday, ideation was the priority and the foundation. Most people today, even service designers and innovation leads don’t really spend most of their time spitting out a bunch of ideas.

That’s why ChatGPT might be a valuable addition to your design and innovation work: it quickly develops lots of ideas, and even trains humans to be better at ideating themselves. It is one of the easiest ways to integrate AI into a workflow and one that could be less threatening than others. Give it a try on your next project.

post authorRich Nadworny

Rich Nadworny

Rich is an Innovation Lead at Hello Future in Sweden. Previously he was design drector and co-founder of Savvy Design Collaborative. At present, Rich works with large Swedish institutions to help build and foster cultures of design-driven innovation and human-centered ways of working.

Between 2015-2018 Rich was the Director of Innovation and Entrepreneurship at Dartmouth College’s Dickey Center. He trained African entrepreneurs in the YALI program through his course Design Driven Entrepreneurship.

He has a background in digital marketing and service design through his firm Digalicious and as partner, digital strategist and creative director at the brand agency Kelliher Samets Volk.

Rich teaches human-centered design at the Royal School of Technology (KTH) in Sweden.

He was a commentator on Vermont’s National Public Radio station (VPR) between 2009-2018 and blogged at Huffington Post. He has a B.A. from Dartmouth, an M.S. from Boston University and studied design/innovation at the California College of Arts.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The article discusses a study that compares the ideation abilities of MBA students and ChatGPT, with ChatGPT outperforming in both the quantity and quality of ideas.

Related Articles

As AI takes on more of the solution work, the real craft of design shifts to how we frame the problem. This piece explores why staying with uncertainty and resisting the urge to rush to answers may be a designer’s most powerful skill.

Article by Morteza Pourmohamadi
The Frame, the Illusion, and the Brief
  • The article highlights that as AI takes over more of the solution work, the designer’s true craft lies in framing the problem rather than rushing to solve it.
  • It shows how cognitive biases like the need for closure or action bias can distort our perception, making careful problem framing essential for clarity and creativity.
  • The piece argues that framing is itself a design act — a practice of staying with uncertainty long enough to cultivate shared understanding and more meaningful outcomes.
Share:The Frame, the Illusion, and the Brief
3 min read

UX isn’t just about screens — it’s about feelings. This article explores why the future of UX depends on blending artificial and emotional intelligence to create truly human experiences.

Article by Krystian M. Frahn
UX is More Than Screens: The Art of Designing Emotions
  • The article shows how Steve Jobs’ shift from “form follows function” to “form follows emotion” transformed design into a deeply human practice centered on empathy.
  • It explains that emotions drive perception, usability, and loyalty — making emotional intelligence essential to meaningful user experiences.
  • The piece argues that the future of UX lies in uniting artificial and emotional intelligence to create technology that feels truly human.
Share:UX is More Than Screens: The Art of Designing Emotions
6 min read

Lean UX and User-Centered Design share the same heart — empathy for users — but differ in pace and practice. This piece shows how Lean UX turns UCD principles into a faster, data-driven approach for modern teams.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Lean UX vs. User-Centered Design
  • The article explains that while both Lean UX and User-Centered Design focus on users, Lean UX adapts UCD principles for speed, collaboration, and rapid learning.
  • It argues that Lean UX evolves user-centered thinking into an agile, data-driven process that helps teams design the right thing faster.
Share:Lean UX vs. User-Centered Design
3 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and