Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Content and Copy ›› I Want Better Font Size Choices, Google #wtfUX

I Want Better Font Size Choices, Google #wtfUX

by Indrani Stangl
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Google should reconsider its Starbucks-esque approach to font size choices.

When I compose a document—any document, in almost any application—I can choose a font size in increments. But Google has decided what sizes are appropriate for me. It’s like the Starbuck’s approach to fonts: Short, Tall, Grande, Venti.

In my opinion, “small” is too small, and so is “normal.” Plus the term “normal” makes me feel shame for my old eyeballs. “Large” is too big, and “Huge” is just completely ridiculous.

Why can’t Google be “normal” and give us more choices?

​wtfUX ​Google!?

Keep these coming. Send them to us via Twitter or Facebook using the hastag #wtfUX or email them to: [email protected] with “#wtfUX” in the subject line. Include as much context as you can, so we get a full understanding of what the f%*k went wrong. Image of pygmy mouse courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorIndrani Stangl

Indrani Stangl
Indrani Stangl is one of the rare Silicon Valley natives who has not flown the coop (yet). She was embedded in the dot.com boom and bomb, and is watching the technological revolution from a front row seat. She works as an administrator at a famous higher education institution, has a private practice as a career coach, and runs a puppy rescue that saves 500 dogs a year from euthanasia. She is otherwise known as the Girl with DesignRage.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Find out how UX culture mistakes burnout for brilliance and what it’s really costing designers, researchers, and the products they build.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Acquired Savant Syndrome in Design: Skill, Obsession, or Exploitation?
  • The piece explores the metaphorical parallels between acquired savant syndrome and modern UX culture, arguing that the industry dangerously romanticizes obsession and burnout-driven brilliance over sustainable skill and calling on designers, researchers, and leaders to redefine excellence through ethical, well-paced, and mentally healthy creative practice.
Share:Acquired Savant Syndrome in Design: Skill, Obsession, or Exploitation?
6 min read

Examine the boundaries of engagement and envision the ideal ethical design.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Gamification or Manipulation? Understanding the Ethics of Engagement Loops
  • The article examines the fine line between ethical gamification and psychological manipulation in UX design, contrasting harmful engagement loops, such as Snapchat streaks and casino-style mobile games, with genuinely empowering examples like Duolingo and Khan Academy, while offering designers a framework of ethical questions to ensure their work elevates users rather than exploits them.
Share:Gamification or Manipulation? Understanding the Ethics of Engagement Loops
5 min read

Find out how pre-selected options silently shape decisions, and what ethical designers must do about it.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
The Psychology of Defaults: How Pre-Selected Options Influence Behavior
  • The article argues that defaults quietly guide user decisions through inaction, making them far more powerful than most designers realize.
  • It highlights that they work by exploiting natural human tendencies like status quo bias and the assumption that pre-selected options are “recommended.”
  • The piece emphasizes that ethical design doesn’t eliminate defaults but uses them transparently, with user intent and easy reversibility at the core.
Share:The Psychology of Defaults: How Pre-Selected Options Influence Behavior
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and