Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Content and Copy ›› I Want Better Font Size Choices, Google #wtfUX

I Want Better Font Size Choices, Google #wtfUX

by Indrani Stangl
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Google should reconsider its Starbucks-esque approach to font size choices.

When I compose a document—any document, in almost any application—I can choose a font size in increments. But Google has decided what sizes are appropriate for me. It’s like the Starbuck’s approach to fonts: Short, Tall, Grande, Venti.

In my opinion, “small” is too small, and so is “normal.” Plus the term “normal” makes me feel shame for my old eyeballs. “Large” is too big, and “Huge” is just completely ridiculous.

Why can’t Google be “normal” and give us more choices?

​wtfUX ​Google!?

Keep these coming. Send them to us via Twitter or Facebook using the hastag #wtfUX or email them to: [email protected] with “#wtfUX” in the subject line. Include as much context as you can, so we get a full understanding of what the f%*k went wrong. Image of pygmy mouse courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorIndrani Stangl

Indrani Stangl
Indrani Stangl is one of the rare Silicon Valley natives who has not flown the coop (yet). She was embedded in the dot.com boom and bomb, and is watching the technological revolution from a front row seat. She works as an administrator at a famous higher education institution, has a private practice as a career coach, and runs a puppy rescue that saves 500 dogs a year from euthanasia. She is otherwise known as the Girl with DesignRage.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI didn’t just change work — it removed the starting point. This piece explores what happens when early-career jobs vanish, and why the most “future-proof” skills might be the oldest ones.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
AI, Early-Career Jobs, and the Return to Thinking
  • The article illustrates how AI is quickly taking over beginner-level jobs that involve routine work.
  • The piece argues that the skills that remain most valuable are human ones, like critical thinking, communication, big-picture understanding, and ethics.
  • It suggests that companies must decide whether to replace junior staff with AI or use AI to help train and support them.
Share:AI, Early-Career Jobs, and the Return to Thinking
5 min read

Learn when to talk to users, and when to watch them in order to uncover real insights and design experiences that truly work.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
  • The article distinguishes between usability tests and focus groups, highlighting their different roles in UX research.
  • It explains that focus groups gather opinions and attitudes, while usability tests observe real user behavior to find design issues.
  • The piece stresses using each method at the right stage to build the right product and ensure a better user experience.
Share:Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
2 min read

Explore how interaction data uncovers hidden user-behavior patterns that drive smarter product decisions, better UX, and continuous improvement.

Article by Srikanth R
The Power of Interaction Data: Tracking User Behavior in Modern Web Apps
  • The article explains how interaction data like clicks, scrolls, and session patterns reveals real user behavior beyond basic analytics.
  • It shows how tools such as heatmaps and session replays turn this data into actionable insights that improve UX and product decisions.
  • The piece emphasizes using behavioral insights responsibly, balancing optimization with user privacy and ethical data practices.
Share:The Power of Interaction Data: Tracking User Behavior in Modern Web Apps
14 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and