Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Behavioral Science ›› How spatial logic can make your product design more intuitive and high-craft

How spatial logic can make your product design more intuitive and high-craft

by Vida Zhang
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

How-spatial-logic-can-make-your-product-design-more-intuitive-and-high-craft-lead-banner.png

Navigation in digital influences design. 4 reasons why having clear spatial logic between components in design is necessary.

Just as in the real world, when navigating in digital products, people need to know where they are, how they got there, and how to get out. That’s why having clear spatial logic between components is necessary.

1. Good spatial logic often maps to physical world metaphors

Opening a folder on iOS is like opening a folder or a box in real life. The expanding animation keeps the continuity of the “folder” — it’s as if we brought a physical folder closer to our eyes to see what’s inside.

Opening a folder on iOS
Opening an app on iOS

2. People have also gotten used to digital-native patterns that don’t exist in the physical world

For example, iOS users are quite used to opening a list cell that pushes the next screen in, or tapping on bottom tab bars to see a different screens. These patterns don’t remind us of any physical world interactions, but people get used to them after thousands of repetitions. As designers, we should leverage these familiar patterns as much as we can.

Opening a list cell
Opening a list cell
Tapping on a tap bar
Tapping on a tap bar

3. Clear spatial logic your design more intuitive

Compare swiping down to access notification center on iOS and control center on Android. On iOS, the spatial relationship between the notification screen (screen A) and the launch screen (screen B) is straightforward. A sits on top of B — edge swiping pulls it off, the gesture and screen movement synchronized. It’s straightforward because we can easily find a physical world metaphor.

Swiping down for notif screen on iOS
Swiping down for notif screen on iOS

In comparison, the spatial logic of the same interaction on Android is much less clear. By pulling down anywhere on the screen, the launch screen morphs into a white layer — no mapping physical world metaphor here.

It’s also hard to tell visually the spatial logic between the control layer with the black background and the white layer. Are they on the same level or the black layer is one level lower? Whereas on iOS the blur effect on the notification screen gives a clear clue.

Users can definitely get used to this interaction with repetition, but the lack of spatial logic will always cause cognitive dissonance. Subtleties like this make the product feel less fluid and thus of lesser quality as well.

Swiping down control center on Android
Swiping down control center on Android

4. Seamless animation also plays a huge role in establishing spatial logic and elevating product quality

Let’s look at opening and closing an app on iOS. When opening an app, the app icon expands and fades out, with the app screen fading in and growing in size with the fading icon. The animation establishes the spatial logic and tells the user where the app lives in this digital space — it’s embedded within its icon. Closing app animation mirrors this behavior, which is expected, as the app goes back to where it came from.

Opening and closing an app on iOS
Opening and closing an app on iOS
Opening and closing an app on iOS slowed down (manually)
Opening and closing an app on iOS slowed down

In comparison, the opening vs closing app interaction on Android is somewhat fragmented. But I’ll leave it to you to observe and find out in the video below.

Opening and closing an app on Android
Opening and closing an app on Android

To summarize, when you think about elevating the intuitiveness and craft of your product, look into the spatial logic implied by the design.

  1. Does it map to real-world metaphors?
  2. Does it follow an interaction pattern that most people are familiar with?
  3. Does the spatial logic simply make sense?
  4. Are you using animation to demonstrate the spatial logic?

In design, subtleties like these always matter.

post authorVida Zhang

Vida Zhang
Vida Zhang is a product designer at Meta, working on Messenger. She’s passionate about designing great products and writes about no-frill design tips.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • It is important to use spacial logic in digital products as it helps people understand where they are, how they got here and how they can get out – like in the real life.
  • 4 reasons why having clear spatial logic between components in design is necessary:
    • Good spatial logic often maps to physical world metaphors
    • People have also gotten used to digital-native patterns that don’t exist in the physical world
    • Clear spatial logic your design more intuitive
    • Seamless animation also plays a huge role in establishing spatial logic and elevating product quality
  • Vida Zhang, a Product Designer at Meta, suggests looking into the spatial logic implied by the design when you think about elevating the intuitiveness and craft of your product.

Related Articles

Forget linear workflows — today’s creative process is dynamic, AI-assisted, and deeply personal. Learn how to build a system that flows with you, not against you.

Article by Jim Gulsen
The Creative Stack: How to Thrive in a Nonlinear, AI-Assisted World
  • The article explores the shift from linear to nonlinear, AI-assisted creative workflows.
  • It shares practical ways to reduce friction and improve flow by optimizing tools, habits, and environments.
  • It argues that success comes from designing your own system, not just using more tools.
Share:The Creative Stack: How to Thrive in a Nonlinear, AI-Assisted World
7 min read

How is AI really changing the way designers work, and what still depends on human skill? This honest take cuts through the hype to show where AI helps, where it falls short, and what great design still demands.

Article by Oleh Osadchyi
The Real Impact of AI on Designers’ Day-To-Day and Interfaces: What Still Matters
  • The article explores how AI is reshaping designers’ workflows, offering speed and support across research, implementation, and testing.
  • It argues that while AI is useful, it lacks depth and context — making human judgment, critical thinking, and user insight indispensable.
  • It emphasizes that core design principles remain unchanged, and designers must learn to integrate AI without losing their craft.
Share:The Real Impact of AI on Designers’ Day-To-Day and Interfaces: What Still Matters
9 min read

What if you could build software just by talking to your computer? Welcome to vibe coding, where code takes a back seat and the vibe leads.

Article by Jacquelyn Halpern
Vibe Coding: Is This How We’ll Build Software in the Future?
  • The article introduces vibe coding, using AI to turn natural language into working code, and shows how this approach lets non-coders build software quickly and independently.
  • The piece lists key tools enabling vibe coding, like Cursor, Claude, and Perplexity, and notes risks like security, overreliance on AI, and the need for human oversight.
Share:Vibe Coding: Is This How We’ll Build Software in the Future?
7 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and