Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Google ›› Google’s Dilemma (GPT3)

Google’s Dilemma (GPT3)

by Aydin Ozcekic
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

What to expect from Google after a GPT3 solution release?

Google search is the search engine in the world. The latest earnings report from Alphabet, Google’s parent company, shows that search ads continue to drive Google’s revenue. In Q3 2022, Google’s revenue totaled $69.1 billion, of which $39.5 billion (or 57.2%) was from search ads.

Everybody is expecting a response from Google against the GPT3 solution. Everybody knows that Google has everything to create the best AI solutions.

Google Dilemma

Google monetizes search business and creates massive revenue. Hence, they have a fear of disrupting their business line. Monetization is a crucial thing for R&D projects. A lot of successful high-tech start-up struggle with the monetization of their business. Google solved this problem and transformed itself from a start-up to a tech giant.

Now they are unsure how to position a GPT3 type of solution in their revenue stream.

There is a borderline between GPT3 and Google Search. GPT3 is a language model that can reach data and create answers. Google search is a “to-do point” search tool to show you the possible best resources. Google search allows users to do their own research and not be responsible for the content. However, GPT3 is responsible for the answer. Because this answer is not referenced to another source. If you were Google, would you want to take this responsibility and threaten your easy search income? I don’t think so.

Another difference between Google Search and GPT3 is that Google knows what people are looking for. GPT3 focuses on the best answer it can generate. Google predicts what you can ask. This is far more important than the answer. I always believe that the right questions make a difference.

What should Google do?

Google is not an agile start-up anymore. They are a tech giant, so they can’t answer all hypes with a move. GPT3 shows a new product line that can disrupt search. But Google has more than an algorithm. They know the behaviors of people. They have data about what you search for when you search and the actions you take. So, this is a different business model.

Google search already answers some questions, and people use these answers in daily life. The critical point is that Google doesn’t want to break links with the websites. Because websites are the backbone of income, it is essential to support the future of the web.

Centralization of Knowledge

GPT3 is the side of centralization of knowledge (Single Source of Truth). But Google is the side of the diversity of knowledge. You can search and reach ten different opinions. But GPT3 gives you the most likable answer. Because the GPT3 tries to make the end user happy, which creates bias. The answer you want to hear can be the worst answer to that question.

So, GPT3 can be a data dictator. And unexpectedly, Google can be a democratic alternative. This is not about the ethic of Google; democracy and competition on the web is the primary source of income for Google.

In other words, creating a single source of truth with centralized AI is the enemy of Google. Google’s business model focuses on the competition of different knowledge nodes on the web.

I am on the side of Google. I want to search and reach my answers instead of the quick answers from an AI model. When I use GPT3, I go to google search to verify the answer. So, the competition of websites is a better case against the competition of AI dictator bots.

Lastly, I am waiting for a solution from Google to answer questions with different references and comparisons from the web. We will see 🙂

post authorAydin Ozcekic

Aydin Ozcekic

Aydin Ozcekic is the CEO of Botmore Technology, based in London. With over 15 years of experience in AI implementation across various industries, Aydin brings a wealth of knowledge to the table. He holds both an engineering degree and an MBA, making him well-equipped to lead and manage R&D projects in the UK and Turkey.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • Everyone is waiting for Google to respond to the GPT3 solution as Google possesses the necessary tools to develop the greatest AI solutions.
  • There is a significant distinction between the ways GPT3 and Google search operate:
    • GPT3 can access data and produce solutions while Google displays the best resources that might be available.
    • GPT3 is responsible for the answer it produces while Google is not.
    • GPT3 concentrates on producing the best possible response while Google anticipates your questions.
    • GPT3 represents the side of knowledge centralization while Google represents the diversity of knowledge.
  • According to the author, it’s crucial for Google to support websites that are the foundation of revenue and not change the way it works.

Related Articles

AI can create wireframes, synthesize research, and draft copy fast. What it can’t do: understand your users, carry context, or be accountable when something goes wrong. That’s still you.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
AI Is Your New Intern, Not Your Replacement
  • AI is not replacing UX pros; it’s automating repetitive tasks and augmenting human capabilities.
  • Think of AI as an intern: quick, smart, but dependent on human direction, context, and judgment.
  • Human skills like empathy, research, systems thinking, and ethical decision-making are more important than ever.
  • The future belongs to designers who incorporate AI to accelerate execution and devote more time to strategic, human-centered work.
Share:AI Is Your New Intern, Not Your Replacement
20 min read

Hiring is automated. The tools built to help you keep up are making it worse. There’s another way — one that puts your data, your drafts, and your decisions back in your hands.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
Job Search Terminal: A Local-First Tool for an AI-Shaped Job Market
  • The piece argues that most AI job search utilities deal with the wrong problem: they only lower barriers for candidates and perpetuate existing power imbalances.
  • It contends that the choice of local-first, people-centered tools is a political position on professional data ownership, not simply a technical decision.
Share:Job Search Terminal: A Local-First Tool for an AI-Shaped Job Market
5 min read

For researchers, AI tools are making the move from advising to building easier than ever. But the real obstacle was never technical. Meet the researchers who allowed themselves to create — and what the cost was.

Article by James Lang
The New Makers
  • The article says that becoming a maker as a researcher is less about learning new tools or skills and more about giving yourself a new identity, and that without fixing the internal permission structures that define your swim lane, even the most democratized AI tools won’t turn a researcher into a maker — you don’t have a founder; you have a frustrated advisor with a prototype.
Share:The New Makers
20 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and