Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Customer Experience ›› Why We Need to Design Dialogue… Now

Why We Need to Design Dialogue… Now

by Fred Dust
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Why We Need to Design Dialogue... Now

Thinking of designing dialogue? Here are some more reasons for you to start doing it.

It’s been a little over a year since I published my book, Making Conversation. I made a lot of conversations this year — I’ve written a lot, I’ve gone on a bunch of great podcasts, and I’ve lectured on the idea of using design to get creative about our hardest conversations.

Over the last 18 months, we’ve designed dialogue that has launched multi-billion dollar endeavors. We’ve hosted many intimate conversations that have explored issues of race and class in board contexts. Some days we’ve designed high-level policy conversations that included politicians and children affected by previous policies made; other days, we’ve worked on community conversations around religion and death. Whether it’s been helping corporate cultures get simpler and more succinct or helping organizations figure out how to have conversations with their consumers, members or constituents. It’s been a lot, it’s never been dull and it’s almost always… been fun.

Oh right — and I announced the launch of my new business.

So I thought I’d kick off the New Year (in more ways than one) the right way: by sharing what I’ve learned about designing dialogue in the last year.

First, it works — like, always

Nothing works all the time. I know that. But designing dialogue formats and structures for the organization or community we’re engaging with to address the realities they’re grappling with goes a long way to solving problems and breaking through barriers. The combination of collective ownership of the problem, rules, and structures that make a conversation safe combined with the joy of a creative approach leads to people engaging deeper and taking on the practice and solutions more actively.

After all, it’s their conversation, their community, and ultimately, their solutions.

Difference matters

In my book, I wrote about how we are innately afraid of difference in the room. As I’ve been building my team, I’ve actively sought out differences — my practice is made up of mostly wild card hires.

These super hybrids make the work more robust, the tools we have at our disposal more unique –and the day just far more fun.

  • A strategist who is also a conflict negotiator
  • A neuroscientist who can talk to dogs
  • A designer who deals in death (Actually she’s a death doula)
  • And an interaction designer who is a speech pathologist

These are just some of the skills we have on the team. Often when we do team introductions, I wonder, “What surprising skill is going to show up today?” and I’m never bored with the results of our coming together.

So rather than avoid and shirk differences, I suggest going deep and really inviting differences into your life and the work you do.

The facts of fun

There’s a line from Johnathan Irving: “Life is work, art is fun.”

That always seems to be simmering in the back of my mind as we work. Creatively approaching our hardest conversations means that they are more than just interesting–they’re enjoyable. We “Zoom” in from all over the world. And they’re doing this because these conversations feel like creative acts — even if they are doing hard work.

Adding creativity maximizes joy.

Some of the dialogue formats we use can feel outrageous, others subtle. The red thread throughout them though, is they’re always sneaky, interesting, and surprisingly addictive.

That’s why (amongst other methods) we’ve also spent the last year building out a suite of what we’re calling “dangerous games.” They’ll join the world over the next year. I think you’ll like them. They’re scary fun. And surprisingly powerful. I’ve watched the game break people–in a good way–again and again.

So, onwards

We’re excited about expanding the people and organizations we’re working with and spreading the things we learn and all new creative endeavors.

As we go forward, we won’t be silent. Our intention is not just to absorb but also to transmit. We want to pass on what we are learning and seeing to you.

Most importantly, we want to bring you into that conversation as we go

So, what are you seeing? Hearing? And learning? What would you like to see from this space in the future?

Quarterly group calls?

A monthly intimate global huddle?

The occasional class to share what we’re learning to make better conversations?

Let us know.

We’ll be delving deep into the idea of listening into the coming months — so it’s literally our job to keep our ears open. We’ll be talking to everyone, from renowned pet psychics about how to talk to animals, to artists that collaborate with the wind.

So as we work through the very real, very hard conversations of today, we’ll be pushing the limits of dialogue into the more extreme spaces — rich with inspiration for the next creative conversations to come.

post authorFred Dust

Fred Dust

Fred Dust is the founder of Dust&Co. and author of Making Conversation: The Seven Essential Elements of Meaningful Conversation. Fred works at the intersection of business, society and creativity. As a designer, author, educator, consultant, trustee, and advisor to social and business leaders, he is one of the world’s most original thinkers, applying the craft and optimism of human-centered design to the intractable challenges we face today. Using the methodology in his book Making Conversation, he has been working as the Senior Dialogue Designer with The Rockefeller Foundation to explore the future of pressing global needs; and with The Einhorn Collaborative and other foundations to host constructive dialogue with leaders ranging from David Brooks, Reverend Jenn Bailey, and Vivek Murthy to rebuild human connection in a climate of widespread polarization, cynicism and disruption. He is also proud to be faculty at the Esalen Institute. As a former Global Managing Partner at the acclaimed international design firm IDEO, Fred worked with leaders and change agents to unlock the creative potential of business, government, education, and philanthropic organizations.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The author talks about his book “Making Conversation”, his design projects for the last 18 months, and shares what he’s learned about designing dialogue in the last year:
    • Dialogue always works
    • Difference matters
    • Adding creativity maximizes joy

Related Articles

What makes players keep coming back? This piece explores the psychology of hot streaks — how momentum, perception, and smart design can turn short wins into lasting engagement.

Article by Montgomery Singman
The Psychology of Hot Streak Game Design: How to Keep Players Coming Back Every Day Without Shame
  • The article shows how hot streaks tap into players’ psychology, turning momentum into motivation.
  • It highlights the hot-hand fallacy, where players overestimate their chances of continued success.
  • The piece argues that ethical streak design should enhance engagement without exploiting addictive behavior.
Share:The Psychology of Hot Streak Game Design: How to Keep Players Coming Back Every Day Without Shame
26 min read

Trusting AI isn’t the goal — relying on it is. This article explores why human trust and AI reliance are worlds apart, and what UX designers should focus on to make AI feel dependable, not human.

Article by Verena Seibert-Giller
The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
  • The article argues that “reliance,” not “trust,” is the right way to think about users’ relationship with AI.
  • It explains that human trust and AI reliance are driven by different psychological mechanisms.
  • The piece highlights that predictability, transparency, and control make users more willing to rely on AI.
  • It concludes that users don’t need to trust AI as a partner — only rely on it as a dependable tool.
Share:The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
4 min read

What if your productivity app could keep you as focused as your favorite game? This article explores how game design psychology can transform everyday tools into experiences that spark flow, focus, and real engagement.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Flow State Design: Applying Game Psychology to Productivity Apps
  • The article shows how principles from game design can help productivity tools create and sustain a flow state.
  • It explains that games succeed by balancing challenge and skill, providing clear goals, and offering immediate feedback — elements most productivity apps lack.
  • The piece argues that applying these psychological insights could make work tools more engaging, adaptive, and motivating.
Share:Flow State Design: Applying Game Psychology to Productivity Apps
12 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and