Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Behavioral Science ›› The secrets of collaboration

The secrets of collaboration

by Vicky Gao
7 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

collaboration_Slider

A few methods that work well in the world of collaboration.

Set up a RAPID Decision Making Model

RAPID decision making

The RAPID Decision Making Model is a framework that can help organizations make better decisions. It clarifies who should do what for each complex decision that needs to be made.

The model defines who makes a recommendation, who agrees to a recommendation, who performs the decision, who provides input to a recommendation, and who makes the final decision. It is extremely beneficial when conflicts appear, as this model specifies which person takes what responsibility for the team to land on the final decision.

Treat conflicts as opportunities

RAPID decision making

It forces the team to prioritize within constraints, and deeply understand what is most significant for the company.

Take one of my recent projects as an example: the product we planned to build has the opportunity to be componentized so that other teams can easily leverage it in the future. However, for componentization, the development timeline takes longer, which can push off the launch date. There is a tradeoff between the short-term timeline and long-term efficiency. Thinking through what benefits the company most, we’ve chosen the latter. Easy as it may sound, it took us a long time to come to this decision. Tons of discussions happened to think through all the pros & cons, to balance between risks and opportunities.

Conflicts can slow down decision making, but the right decision eventually speeds up the process.

Involve the right people at the right time

RAPID decision making

It is essential to keep everyone on the same page, but we also need to be mindful of whom to involve in different phases.

As a designer, when a new project is initiated, the product manager is my person to understand the landscape and vision. At the early stage of the design process, I spend most of my time with the user researcher to understand user pain points. If there is any data available to provide insights, the data scientist is someone I would reach out to. When it comes to design explorations, I always make sure the product manager and engineers are included in main design reviews, since their input will impact the final direction. While handing off the design to engineers, it is crucial to sit with them going through details, as they would need to understand different use cases, flows, visuals, as well as interactions.

Involving the right people at the right time increases team efficiency and keeps the conversation focused.

Communicate differently based on your audience

RAPID decision making

To avoid it, communicate wisely based on who your audience is.

When you are pitching your design to the leadership team, be clear on the core message you want to deliver and prioritize what to show to get their buy-in. Don’t waste time on tiny details, which can distract their attention. However, when explaining your final design to engineers, details become the key. Make sure you’ve thought through every piece so that they understand what exactly to build.

Besides proactive communication, it is also useful to share what you are working on “passively”.

One of the methods is having a centralized place to host your files and present them in a way that is easy to scan through, which reduces the unnecessary communication regarding “where to find your latest design”.

Build a strong team with design superpower

RAPID decision making

Design is a visual language that everybody understands and can resonate with, which makes it a bridge connecting different functions. What we’ve learned through the design process can be totally leveraged to build a strong team.

 

Illustrations in this article are created by Vicky Gao.

 
post authorVicky Gao

Vicky Gao

Vicky Gao is a Senior User Experience Designer at LinkedIn, where she designed and shipped the hiring product for users from small business. She deeply believes in people first, and her strengths include user-centric product strategy, problem-solving, and delivering design solution at scale. Previously, she graduated from Georgia Tech with a Master degree in Human Computer Interaction.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI that always agrees? Over-alignment might be the hidden danger, reinforcing your misconceptions and draining your mind. Learn why this subtle failure mode is more harmful than you think — and how we can fix it.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Introducing Over-Alignment
  • The article explores over-alignment — a failure mode where AI overly validates users’ assumptions, reinforcing false beliefs.
  • It shows how this feedback loop can cause cognitive fatigue, emotional strain, and professional harm.
  • The piece calls for AI systems to balance empathy with critical feedback to prevent these risks.
Share:Introducing Over-Alignment
4 min read

Why does AI call you brilliant — then refuse to tell you why? This article unpacks the paradox of empty praise and the silence that follows when validation really matters.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The AI Praise Paradox
  • The article explores how AI often gives empty compliments instead of real support, and how design choices like that can make people trust it less.
  • It looks at the strange way AI praises fancy-sounding language but ignores real logic, which can be harmful, especially in sensitive areas like mental health.
  • The piece argues that AI needs to be more genuinely helpful and aligned with users to truly empower them.
Share:The AI Praise Paradox
4 min read

Mashed potatoes as a lifestyle brand? When AI starts generating user personas for absurd products — and we start taking them seriously — it’s time to ask if we’ve all lost the plot. This sharp, irreverent critique exposes the real risks of using LLMs as synthetic users in UX research.

Article by Saul Wyner
Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
  • The article explores the growing use of AI-generated personas in UX research and why it’s often a shortcut with serious flaws.
  • It introduces critiques that LLMs are trained to mimic structure, not judgment. When researchers use AI as a stand-in for real users, they risk mistaking coherence for credibility and fantasy for data.
  • The piece argues that AI tools in UX should be assistants, not oracles. Trusting “synthetic users” or AI-conjured feedback risks replacing real insights with confident nonsense.
Share:Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
22 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and