Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› Oversoaped in Los Angeles #wtfUX

Oversoaped in Los Angeles #wtfUX

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A confusing real-life interface at Los Angeles International Airport leaves an interaction designer with too much soap on his hands.

Bad design decisions don’t just effect our experiences with digital products. There are plenty of poorly conceived products in the world of flesh and blood and brick and mortar waiting to derail your flow.

A sink in the men’s restroom at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) recently reminded Kane Albarron of this. The Interaction Design Lead at Fjord in New York City got more soap than he anticipated thanks to a confusing real-life interface.

“At first glance, it appears as if you have two options for dispensing water: by sensor or by push button, as indicated on the labels,” Albarron says. “What is actually happening here is that the push dispenses soap, and the sensor dispenses water. To further complicate things, soap pumps are also available above the sink.

LAX bathroom wtfUX

“I thought this was interesting, seeing as how someone actually spent time and money making little plaques that indicate the action instead of the contents. It was a real WTF moment for me when I went to rinse off my soap with more soap.”

 

Keep these coming. Send them to us via Twitter or Facebook using the hastag #wtfUX or email them to: [email protected] with “#wtfUX” in the subject line. Include as much context as you can, so we get a full understanding of what the f%*k went wrong.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Find out how UX culture mistakes burnout for brilliance and what it’s really costing designers, researchers, and the products they build.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Acquired Savant Syndrome in Design: Skill, Obsession, or Exploitation?
  • The piece explores the metaphorical parallels between acquired savant syndrome and modern UX culture, arguing that the industry dangerously romanticizes obsession and burnout-driven brilliance over sustainable skill and calling on designers, researchers, and leaders to redefine excellence through ethical, well-paced, and mentally healthy creative practice.
Share:Acquired Savant Syndrome in Design: Skill, Obsession, or Exploitation?
6 min read

Examine the boundaries of engagement and envision the ideal ethical design.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Gamification or Manipulation? Understanding the Ethics of Engagement Loops
  • The article examines the fine line between ethical gamification and psychological manipulation in UX design, contrasting harmful engagement loops, such as Snapchat streaks and casino-style mobile games, with genuinely empowering examples like Duolingo and Khan Academy, while offering designers a framework of ethical questions to ensure their work elevates users rather than exploits them.
Share:Gamification or Manipulation? Understanding the Ethics of Engagement Loops
5 min read

Find out how pre-selected options silently shape decisions, and what ethical designers must do about it.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
The Psychology of Defaults: How Pre-Selected Options Influence Behavior
  • The article argues that defaults quietly guide user decisions through inaction, making them far more powerful than most designers realize.
  • It highlights that they work by exploiting natural human tendencies like status quo bias and the assumption that pre-selected options are “recommended.”
  • The piece emphasizes that ethical design doesn’t eliminate defaults but uses them transparently, with user intent and easy reversibility at the core.
Share:The Psychology of Defaults: How Pre-Selected Options Influence Behavior
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and