Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› Oversoaped in Los Angeles #wtfUX

Oversoaped in Los Angeles #wtfUX

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A confusing real-life interface at Los Angeles International Airport leaves an interaction designer with too much soap on his hands.

Bad design decisions don’t just effect our experiences with digital products. There are plenty of poorly conceived products in the world of flesh and blood and brick and mortar waiting to derail your flow.

A sink in the men’s restroom at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) recently reminded Kane Albarron of this. The Interaction Design Lead at Fjord in New York City got more soap than he anticipated thanks to a confusing real-life interface.

“At first glance, it appears as if you have two options for dispensing water: by sensor or by push button, as indicated on the labels,” Albarron says. “What is actually happening here is that the push dispenses soap, and the sensor dispenses water. To further complicate things, soap pumps are also available above the sink.

LAX bathroom wtfUX

“I thought this was interesting, seeing as how someone actually spent time and money making little plaques that indicate the action instead of the contents. It was a real WTF moment for me when I went to rinse off my soap with more soap.”

 

Keep these coming. Send them to us via Twitter or Facebook using the hastag #wtfUX or email them to: [email protected] with “#wtfUX” in the subject line. Include as much context as you can, so we get a full understanding of what the f%*k went wrong.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Find out how clicking “Accept All” is not really consent and how ethical UX design can return user choice to users.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Consent Fatigue: Are We Designing People into Compliance?
  • The article shows that consent fatigue is not a user problem but a design problem in which endless permission popups, visual manipulation, and legal-shield thinking have quietly replaced real user autonomy with engineered compliance.
Share:Consent Fatigue: Are We Designing People into Compliance?
10 min read

Learn how the smallest design decisions, a default checkbox, a colored button, and a progress bar, have the biggest ethical weight.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
The Psychology of Nudges: Why the Smallest Design Element Can Shift the Biggest Outcomes
  • The piece draws a sharp line between nudges and dark patterns by asking one question: who benefits, the user or the platform? Same tools, opposite ethics.
Share:The Psychology of Nudges: Why the Smallest Design Element Can Shift the Biggest Outcomes
6 min read

Find out why your most important design elements keep getting ignored and what you can do about it.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Attention Engineering: Why Users Ignore Even the Most Important Elements
  • The piece explains why users keep missing important buttons and instructions, not because they’re careless, but because the brain automatically blocks out most of what it sees and shows designers how to work with this instead of fighting it.
Share:Attention Engineering: Why Users Ignore Even the Most Important Elements
6 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and