Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Venture Capital ›› How Venture Capital Firms Are Shaping the Future of Product Design, & Why Design Leaders Need to Be Part of the Solution

How Venture Capital Firms Are Shaping the Future of Product Design, & Why Design Leaders Need to Be Part of the Solution

by Darren Smith
8 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Venture capital firms increasingly shape the trajectory of product design, impacting not just which products succeed, but how teams are built and how design is perceived. When VCs prioritize speed and output, the design’s strategic potential can be sidelined, leading to teams that execute rather than innovate. This article examines the unintended consequences of VC-driven hiring practices and highlights a path forward where design leaders partner with VCs to redefine design’s role as a strategic force. By doing so, they can help create standout products that truly connect with users and fuel long-term success.

In recent months, now navigating a period of unemployment, I’ve poured my energy into connecting with people across diverse crafts and backgrounds. It’s been an eye-opening journey to listen, observe, and piece together the dynamics shaping our industry. One insight that recently struck me is how venture capital (VC) firms exert a profound influence not just on which products make it to market, but on how they’re resourced, designed, and developed.

These resources, ranging from financial support, strategic guidance, and vast networks, can make or break a company’s journey from concept to success. However as VCs increasingly take on roles in talent acquisition, particularly in sourcing key hires for product and design roles, there are some unintended consequences for Product Design as a discipline. This article explores the resources VCs provide to startups, how their influence affects Product Design and Design Leadership, and how we, as an industry, can course-correct to build more sustainable, creative, and strategically empowered design teams.

The VC value proposition: fueling growth through supercharging resources

Venture capital firms have long played a crucial role in the startup ecosystem. Their purpose is clear: identify promising startups, invest in them, and help them grow quickly so that both the startup and the VC see returns. Traditionally, this value proposition includes:

  • Financial investment: Capital infusion that fuels a startup’s growth.
  • Strategic guidance: High-level advice on business development, scaling, and market positioning.
  • Network access: Connections to other companies, partners, and talent that would otherwise take years to establish.

VCs provide these resources with the intention of maximizing the startup’s chances of success. However, the manner in which they provide resources, particularly in areas like Talent Acquisition and Team Building, is increasingly shaping the future of Product Design as a craft and, by extension, the overall user experience.

The rise of VC influence in talent acquisition

As startups scale, finding the right talent becomes a critical success factor. This is where VCs often step in, either by helping to source talent directly or by recommending third-party hiring firms. However, a significant challenge arises when non-design professionals, often from investment or operational backgrounds, take the lead in hiring design and product teams. They may lack the nuanced understanding required to identify not only technical skills but also the leadership qualities, strategic vision, and creative acumen that distinguish impactful design leaders.

It’s been an eye-opening journey to listen, observe, and piece together the dynamics shaping our industry.

Non-design talent in the driver’s seat: the risks

It’s common for VCs to step in during hiring, especially for leadership roles, but when VCs are driving the design hiring process, the results can be problematic. Here are some of the key issues that can arise:

  • Misaligned job descriptions: When hiring decisions are led by people with limited Product Design experience, job descriptions tend to focus on operational and execution tasks rather than strategic and creative competencies. Roles are crafted with an emphasis on deliverables, rather than outcomes, and often overlook the strategic value that design leaders bring to the table.
  • Under-appreciation for Product Design as a partner function: Many VCs view design as a functional discipline rather than a partner in product innovation. This perception influences the kinds of leaders they seek, often, they prioritize those with a track record of shipping products quickly rather than those who bring a strong vision for user experience, branding, or customer insights.
  • Reliance on standardized hiring metrics: Without a deep understanding of what makes design teams effective, VCs and hiring firms may prioritize easy-to-measure factors like years of experience, size of an org, familiarity with specific tools (cough, insert Figma reference!), or the number of successful launches, rather than more intangible qualities such as building cultures of innovation, understanding customer needs, storytelling & vision setting, and collaborative ability.

These hiring practices create teams that are optimized for output rather than innovation, reinforcing a view of design as a delivery mechanism rather than a strategic driver.

The impact on Design Leadership: closed doors, reduced influence, limited innovation

When design leaders are chosen based on criteria set by those outside the craft, the result is often a team that focuses on execution rather than strategy. Here’s how this manifests across teams and organizations:

Experienced leaders’ expertise dismissed

The expertise of seasoned design leaders is often overlooked, assessed through the narrow lens of “hands-on” comfort by non-craft reviewers. The problem is that “hands-on” is a broad term, spanning everything from delivering screens to unifying workflows, establishing design systems, and guiding work through rituals like critiques. Depending on how you measure it, design leaders can either be an additive presence or a multiplier, amplifying value far beyond surface-level contributions.

Design as a delivery function, not a strategic partner

In many VC-backed companies, design is seen as a means to an end, a team that makes products look good and function smoothly, but not as a partner in defining what products should be. This approach limits Product Design’s impact on the product vision, as well as on company-wide initiatives. When designers are brought in too late in the product development process or are excluded from strategic discussions, it reinforces the perception that design is simply a “make it look pretty” function rather than a core element of user-centered innovation.

Design leaders as task managers

When design leaders are selected based on their ability to execute rather than their strategic vision, they’re often tasked with managing outputs, checking off deliverables, and meeting deadlines. This expectation severely limits their ability to shape the product from a higher level. Instead of serving as influential partners to product and engineering leaders, design leads are often constrained to ensuring things “look right” or “fit the brand.” This dynamic leads to burnout, turnover, and a sense of stagnation among designers, as they find themselves unable to contribute meaningfully to the company’s mission or innovation.

The broader impact: boilerplate design and failure to meet product-market fit

When VCs drive talent acquisition without a nuanced understanding of design, the result is often homogenised products. Without strong, strategically-minded design leadership, companies risk creating products that look and feel generic, that fail to differentiate themselves, or that simply mimic what’s already out there. In a competitive market, this is a dangerous pitfall. Without unique, thoughtfully designed experiences, products struggle to resonate with users on a deeper level, leading to reduced brand loyalty and limited growth potential.

Even more critically, Product-Market Fit (PMF) often slips through the cracks when design isn’t empowered to drive discovery and innovation. The divergent thinking phase of the Double Diamond process is crucial here, as it reduces risk and enhances the likelihood of hitting the mark.

Design as a delivery function to a defined Product Requirements Document (PRD). In this model, the assumption is that the “thing” just has to be pretty or usable to meet customer expectations. Risky assumption indeed…

Product Market Fit and innovation are implicitly linked

Course correction: how design leaders & VCs can shape the future

While the issues we’ve outlined are challenging, they’re not without solutions. Product Design leaders have a vital role to play in shaping the future of the industry, particularly in VC-backed environments. Here’s how we can move forward.

Redefine product design’s role in the organization

Design leaders need to proactively redefine what design brings to the table. This means advocating for design as a partner function early in the startup’s lifecycle and educating other leaders, particularly VCs, on the strategic value of design. By demonstrating how design contributes to “Designing the right thing”, design leaders can shift the conversation from outputs to outcomes. Tangibly these measures might be how the craft contributes to user retention, product differentiation, and long-term brand equity.

VC’s, understand that while speed to market is a critical factor, being wrong is more expensive. Shipping fast, and spending valuable engineering resources on a PMF that’s off-target is wasteful. Consider the cost efficiency of building a level of confidence (rigor), and creating a culture of innovation (multiplier). I would argue that’s cheaper than building fast, praying the decisions and market assumptions were correct.

Engage in advisory roles for Talent Acquisition

Design leaders should have a direct role in the hiring process, especially for IC and leadership positions within design. This doesn’t mean they should handle hiring alone, but rather work collaboratively with VCs and other executive teams to define job descriptions, assess candidates, and set expectations. By positioning themselves as advisors, they can ensure that new hires bring not only the necessary skills but also a strategic mindset and a commitment to the company’s mission and values.

For this to happen, and to attract the experience required to effect change, rates need to reflect intent. A daily rate matching that of a Senior Product Designer will not incentivise Design leaders at the calibre required.

Establish metrics for strategic value, not just delivery

In VC-backed environments, metrics matter. Design leaders can influence how success is measured by establishing KPIs that reflect design’s strategic contributions. Instead of measuring team success solely by the number of screens delivered or deadlines met, include metrics such as user engagement, time on task, task completion rate, and customer satisfaction. By establishing meaningful metrics, design can reinforce its role as a driver of product innovation.

Cultivate a culture of continuous learning and growth

VC-backed startups often are required to move at breakneck speed, but it’s essential to build a culture that values continuous learning and growth. Design leaders can encourage a mindset of curiosity and resilience, supporting professional development initiatives and advocating for ongoing education. This creates a healthier, more engaged team and sends a message to the wider organization that design is a long-term asset, not just a project-based function.

It’s on VCs to wake up to the value of design leadership, in ways broader than the output of Figma. Design leadership contributing to shaping the PMF, providing the conditions for great work, up-skilling entire teams, and managing creative futures of teams, is the gig.

Conclusion: a call to action for design leaders and VCs alike

Venture capital firms undeniably play a powerful role in shaping the trajectory of today’s startups, but their influence in areas like talent acquisition and team building must be balanced with the nuanced expertise of design leaders. By working together, VCs and design leaders can foster teams that are not only highly capable in execution but also deeply strategic, and capable of driving meaningful innovation that resonates with users.

For design leaders, the time is now to advocate for a stronger, more strategic role in their organizations, to actively participate in talent acquisition, and to redefine success in ways that go beyond deliverables. And for VCs, embracing Product Design as a partner in innovation rather than a delivery function can transform the impact of their investments, leading to products that don’t just work but delight and inspire.

Together, we can shape a future where design is not merely an afterthought but a driver of growth, a partner in strategy, and a catalyst for meaningful, user-centered innovation.

Any scaling businesses curious about growing their design leadership presence, feel free to reach out. Happy to chat about the opinions of this post and how I might be able to help.

I’m available in an Advisory capability for Venture Capital firms building teams with Product Design requirements. I’ll advise on the right skillset, sourcing candidates from my broad network, and embedding innovation at the core.

I have affordable rates for Advisory, Fractional Leadership support, or bespoke packages in the traditional Venn diagram of Design Leadership: People, Practice, and Strategy.

The article originally appeared on Medium.

Featured image courtesy: Getty Images.

post authorDarren Smith

Darren Smith
Digital Product Leader and Manager, with over 20 years of experience in eCommerce and SaaS, working for some of the largest brands in Europe, North America, and APAC. Darren has helped companies manage the risk of product development with an iterative and value innovation ("build-measure-learn”) approach to product development. He collaborates with his partners and stakeholders to set and then operationalize strategy and vision. As a leader, Darren has built and led multi-disciplined creative and product teams, set practices and rituals to grow and maintain a high-quality bar, and developed the careers of those in my charge.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The article explores how venture capital (VC) firms shape product design by providing startups with critical resources like funding, strategic advice, and network access, but often lack an understanding of design’s strategic value.
  • It discusses the impact of VC-led hiring practices in design, which can lead to misaligned job roles, undervalued design leadership, and teams focused more on output than innovation.
  • The piece calls for a collaborative approach where design leaders work alongside VCs in talent acquisition and strategic planning, establishing design as a key partner to drive product innovation and long-term brand success.

Related Articles

Discover how digital twins are transforming industries by enabling innovation and reducing waste. This article delves into the power of digital twins to create virtual replicas, allowing companies to improve products, processes, and sustainability efforts before physical resources are used. Read on to see how this cutting-edge technology helps streamline operations and drive smarter, eco-friendly decisions

Article by Alla Slesarenko
How Digital Twins Drive Innovation and Minimize Waste
  • The article explores how digital twins—virtual models of physical objects—enable organizations to drive innovation by allowing testing and improvements before physical implementation.
  • It discusses how digital twins can minimize waste and increase efficiency by identifying potential issues early, ultimately optimizing resource use.
  • The piece emphasizes the role of digital twins in various sectors, showcasing their capacity to improve processes, product development, and sustainability initiatives.
Share:How Digital Twins Drive Innovation and Minimize Waste
5 min read

AI is reshaping the role of designers, shifting them from creators to curators. This article explores how AI tools are changing design workflows, allowing designers to focus more on strategy and user experience. Discover how this shift is revolutionizing the design process and the future of creative work.

Article by Andy Budd
The Future of Design: How AI Is Shifting Designers from Makers to Curators
  • This article examines how AI is transforming the role of designers, shifting them from creators to curators.
  • It explores how AI tools are enhancing design processes by automating routine tasks, allowing designers to focus on strategic decision-making and curating user experiences.
  • The piece highlights the growing importance of creativity in managing AI-driven systems and fostering collaboration across teams, ultimately reshaping the future of design work.
Share:The Future of Design: How AI Is Shifting Designers from Makers to Curators
5 min read

Are you overthinking your research process? This article explores how to determine when research is essential and when it might be holding you back. Learn a practical framework to prioritize studies, align with stakeholders, and maximize impact without wasting time or resources. Unlock strategies to focus your efforts on what truly matters.

Article by Carol Rossi
Are You Doing Too Much Research?
  • The article questions the common practice of conducting extensive research, suggesting that not all projects require it. Instead, it highlights the importance of discerning when research is truly necessary.
  • It introduces a framework to prioritize research efforts based on clarity, risk, and cost, ensuring impactful results without unnecessary delays.
  • The author emphasizes the role of stakeholder involvement in the research process, fostering better collaboration and alignment with organizational goals.
  • Practical strategies are provided for tracking and communicating the post-research impact, making the value of research more transparent and measurable.
Share:Are You Doing Too Much Research?
7 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and