Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› How Snapchat and Netflix Break UX Design Principles

How Snapchat and Netflix Break UX Design Principles

by Kumar Shubham
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

How Snapchat and Netflix Break UX Design Principles

Breaking UX principles on purpose? No way! However, Snapchat and Netflix didn’t hesitate in doing so. And after all, who says we can’t occasionally break UX guidelines if it’s for the good cause? 

User Experience (UX) principles and practices play a crucial role in keeping the design process on track while building great UX designs that users will fall in love with. The principles of user experience are like the directions for a recipe but for great design. However, occasionally breaking these UX principles is a good idea.

All of the websites and apps that came along in the early days of the internet had terrible experiences. They had cluttered home pages and distracting color palettes.

But over time, certain UX principles were used to enhance the user experience.

Breaking Design Principles on Purpose

I think it’s important to state that I have never found a case where creating a site against all the principles of good design has turned out to be a remotely good idea. Some of the most successful companies have dared to defy common UX principles!

Let’s have a look at how Snapchat and Netflix purposefully break UX guidelines to achieve specific goals.

Snapchat breaks all the rules

With more than 500+ million downloads on the Google Play Store alone and over 160 million active users each day, Snapchat has caught the attention of its users with its complicated user experience. Snapchat’s iconography is confusing, its labels are non-existent, the app’s functionalities are hidden or obscured, and navigation without Snapchat’s guidance is extremely complicated.

How Snapchat and Netflix Break UX Design Principles. Snapchat’s UI Receives Backlash From Users for being too complicated. Screenshots of snapchat applications.
Snapchat’s UI Receives Backlash From Users for being too complicated

However, Snapchat’s user experience is not bad. It’s actually an incredibly smart design. Their challenging user experience is what keeps them relevant to their primary target audience: teenagers and millennials.

How Snapchat and Netflix Break UX Design Principles. Snapchat User Demographics
Source: Snapchat User Demographics

While Snapchat’s user interface isn’t the most intuitive (at least for adults), it does serve a few critical functions:

It keeps the adults out

Snapchat is a safe place for teens. They intentionally made the user interface challenging to grasp in order to make it difficult for adults to use. Most adults would not bother putting up the effort to learn how to use the app, leading to its abandonment. All content is ephemeral with strict limitations on editing. Most content is sent privately, and no content can be publicly rated or compared. Adults would not bother putting up the effort to learn how to use the app, leading to its abandonment. This limits Snapchat’s user base to teenagers.

It makes people talk about Snapchat

Even teenagers find Snapchat’s user interface challenging, but it becomes a game for them as a means of being cool and fitting in with their peers. Every time a new feature is added to Snapchat, thousands of people ask each other how it works. Each time, that chit-chat raises awareness of Snapchat.

There is a Gamification Component to It

Snapchat understood its users’ psychology and made certain features challenging to access intuitively. Users will only find these features if they spend more time on the platform exploring, which will make them feel rewarded. For example, When a user visits their Snapchat profile, the score appears under their name. It essentially displays how active they are within the app (sending and receiving snaps) as well as how much time they spend on it. This wonderful gamification strategy has been working successfully for Snapchat.

Netflix Does Not Care if You Hate the Auto-Play Trailer Feature

When it comes to user experience, Netflix does most things right, but not too long ago, Netflix decided to auto-play the previews when a user hovers over the thumbnail. This feature annoyed many users, and countless articles, tweets, and blog posts were written about it, where users complained about how annoying the auto-play feature was. To be fair, I can imagine the hypothesis. People who are stopped on a show thumbnail and read the description are interested in the show. So why wouldn’t you help them out by just playing the trailer automatically?

via GIPHY

Netflix Auto Preview Feature

There was another aspect that caught my attention. With the preview sound, there was also additional music playing while the trailers were playing. The music was in tune with the same essence as what the preview trailers displayed. For a scary movie, there were scary screeching sounds, for a comedy, there was upbeat music; and for dramas, slow violins were playing. Now, this might sound trivial, but it is an extremely important feature from a UX perspective and makes a huge difference!

So, what these trailers were ultimately doing was conveying an experience to the user. You were able to know what experience you were about to get just within a few seconds of viewing the preview and without even reading the description! By combining both visual and audio cues, a feeling was successfully communicated to the user.

But after listening to its users, Netflix finally lets users disable auto-play for trailers.

So that’s a wrap-up for now.

And that’s the wrap-up for now!

These companies challenged UX rules for a reason: they researched their target audience’s preferences. That is what user experience is all about! Understanding your customer’s needs and implementing solutions that meet their expectations.

post authorKumar Shubham

Kumar Shubham

I am a user experience designer and an optimistic art impressionist, utterly screaming my thoughts through illustrated drawings. I work meticulously and always seek to improve myself. I love solving problems and have a good sense of teamwork and camaraderie.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The author takes a look at how Snapchat and Netflix purposefully break UX guidelines to achieve specific goals.
  • Real user experience is all about understanding your customers’ needs and implementing solutions that meet their expectations.

Related Articles

Design isn’t just about looks; it’s about human nature. Discover how simple psychological principles can make your product stand out.

Article by Canvs.in
Designing with Psychology to Make Products Stick
  • The article shows how psychology, not just features, makes products memorable.
  • It highlights principles like delight, internal triggers, and false consensus as keys to stickiness.
  • It argues that strong design balances trade-offs and roots choices in real user behavior.
Share:Designing with Psychology to Make Products Stick
7 min read

What makes players keep coming back? This piece explores the psychology of hot streaks — how momentum, perception, and smart design can turn short wins into lasting engagement.

Article by Montgomery Singman
The Psychology of Hot Streak Game Design: How to Keep Players Coming Back Every Day Without Shame
  • The article shows how hot streaks tap into players’ psychology, turning momentum into motivation.
  • It highlights the hot-hand fallacy, where players overestimate their chances of continued success.
  • The piece argues that ethical streak design should enhance engagement without exploiting addictive behavior.
Share:The Psychology of Hot Streak Game Design: How to Keep Players Coming Back Every Day Without Shame
26 min read

Trusting AI isn’t the goal — relying on it is. This article explores why human trust and AI reliance are worlds apart, and what UX designers should focus on to make AI feel dependable, not human.

Article by Verena Seibert-Giller
The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
  • The article argues that “reliance,” not “trust,” is the right way to think about users’ relationship with AI.
  • It explains that human trust and AI reliance are driven by different psychological mechanisms.
  • The piece highlights that predictability, transparency, and control make users more willing to rely on AI.
  • It concludes that users don’t need to trust AI as a partner — only rely on it as a dependable tool.
Share:The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and