Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› How Snapchat and Netflix Break UX Design Principles

How Snapchat and Netflix Break UX Design Principles

by Kumar Shubham
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

How Snapchat and Netflix Break UX Design Principles

Breaking UX principles on purpose? No way! However, Snapchat and Netflix didn’t hesitate in doing so. And after all, who says we can’t occasionally break UX guidelines if it’s for the good cause? 

User Experience (UX) principles and practices play a crucial role in keeping the design process on track while building great UX designs that users will fall in love with. The principles of user experience are like the directions for a recipe but for great design. However, occasionally breaking these UX principles is a good idea.

All of the websites and apps that came along in the early days of the internet had terrible experiences. They had cluttered home pages and distracting color palettes.

But over time, certain UX principles were used to enhance the user experience.

Breaking Design Principles on Purpose

I think it’s important to state that I have never found a case where creating a site against all the principles of good design has turned out to be a remotely good idea. Some of the most successful companies have dared to defy common UX principles!

Let’s have a look at how Snapchat and Netflix purposefully break UX guidelines to achieve specific goals.

Snapchat breaks all the rules

With more than 500+ million downloads on the Google Play Store alone and over 160 million active users each day, Snapchat has caught the attention of its users with its complicated user experience. Snapchat’s iconography is confusing, its labels are non-existent, the app’s functionalities are hidden or obscured, and navigation without Snapchat’s guidance is extremely complicated.

How Snapchat and Netflix Break UX Design Principles. Snapchat’s UI Receives Backlash From Users for being too complicated. Screenshots of snapchat applications.
Snapchat’s UI Receives Backlash From Users for being too complicated

However, Snapchat’s user experience is not bad. It’s actually an incredibly smart design. Their challenging user experience is what keeps them relevant to their primary target audience: teenagers and millennials.

How Snapchat and Netflix Break UX Design Principles. Snapchat User Demographics
Source: Snapchat User Demographics

While Snapchat’s user interface isn’t the most intuitive (at least for adults), it does serve a few critical functions:

It keeps the adults out

Snapchat is a safe place for teens. They intentionally made the user interface challenging to grasp in order to make it difficult for adults to use. Most adults would not bother putting up the effort to learn how to use the app, leading to its abandonment. All content is ephemeral with strict limitations on editing. Most content is sent privately, and no content can be publicly rated or compared. Adults would not bother putting up the effort to learn how to use the app, leading to its abandonment. This limits Snapchat’s user base to teenagers.

It makes people talk about Snapchat

Even teenagers find Snapchat’s user interface challenging, but it becomes a game for them as a means of being cool and fitting in with their peers. Every time a new feature is added to Snapchat, thousands of people ask each other how it works. Each time, that chit-chat raises awareness of Snapchat.

There is a Gamification Component to It

Snapchat understood its users’ psychology and made certain features challenging to access intuitively. Users will only find these features if they spend more time on the platform exploring, which will make them feel rewarded. For example, When a user visits their Snapchat profile, the score appears under their name. It essentially displays how active they are within the app (sending and receiving snaps) as well as how much time they spend on it. This wonderful gamification strategy has been working successfully for Snapchat.

Netflix Does Not Care if You Hate the Auto-Play Trailer Feature

When it comes to user experience, Netflix does most things right, but not too long ago, Netflix decided to auto-play the previews when a user hovers over the thumbnail. This feature annoyed many users, and countless articles, tweets, and blog posts were written about it, where users complained about how annoying the auto-play feature was. To be fair, I can imagine the hypothesis. People who are stopped on a show thumbnail and read the description are interested in the show. So why wouldn’t you help them out by just playing the trailer automatically?

via GIPHY

Netflix Auto Preview Feature

There was another aspect that caught my attention. With the preview sound, there was also additional music playing while the trailers were playing. The music was in tune with the same essence as what the preview trailers displayed. For a scary movie, there were scary screeching sounds, for a comedy, there was upbeat music; and for dramas, slow violins were playing. Now, this might sound trivial, but it is an extremely important feature from a UX perspective and makes a huge difference!

So, what these trailers were ultimately doing was conveying an experience to the user. You were able to know what experience you were about to get just within a few seconds of viewing the preview and without even reading the description! By combining both visual and audio cues, a feeling was successfully communicated to the user.

But after listening to its users, Netflix finally lets users disable auto-play for trailers.

So that’s a wrap-up for now.

And that’s the wrap-up for now!

These companies challenged UX rules for a reason: they researched their target audience’s preferences. That is what user experience is all about! Understanding your customer’s needs and implementing solutions that meet their expectations.

post authorKumar Shubham

Kumar Shubham

I am a user experience designer and an optimistic art impressionist, utterly screaming my thoughts through illustrated drawings. I work meticulously and always seek to improve myself. I love solving problems and have a good sense of teamwork and camaraderie.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The author takes a look at how Snapchat and Netflix purposefully break UX guidelines to achieve specific goals.
  • Real user experience is all about understanding your customers’ needs and implementing solutions that meet their expectations.

Related Articles

Another lesson from studying UX with Laura Klein.

Article by Paivi Salminen
The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
  • Agile teams are fast, but designers get stuck in an infinite loop of visual work: redesigning the same components over and over instead of solving real UX problems.
  • Design systems break that cycle, defining the building blocks once, freeing designers to focus on how the product works, not how it looks.
  • When the basics are in place, teams can start working together sooner, prototype faster, and release incremental features without the interface falling apart.
Share:The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
4 min read

Real engagement is about designing experiences that people want to have. Here are some things that games do well that most apps don’t.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
  • Most apps use gamification as a manipulation layer to drive metrics, but people engage with things that are truly worthy of their time, not points or streak guilt.
  • Apps that people stick with do this by designing for intrinsic motivation, making the experience itself rewarding.
  • The true measure of success is whether users feel more capable, accomplished, and enriched for having used your app.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
8 min read

For researchers, AI tools are making the move from advising to building easier than ever. But the real obstacle was never technical. Meet the researchers who allowed themselves to create — and what the cost was.

Article by James Lang
The New Makers
  • The article says that becoming a maker as a researcher is less about learning new tools or skills and more about giving yourself a new identity, and that without fixing the internal permission structures that define your swim lane, even the most democratized AI tools won’t turn a researcher into a maker — you don’t have a founder; you have a frustrated advisor with a prototype.
Share:The New Makers
20 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and