Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Things UX People Like ›› From Design Thinking to AI Thinking

From Design Thinking to AI Thinking

by Alipta Ballav
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Traditional Design thinking has laid the foundation for how problems are approached and addressed. It is still considered a valuable tool to address a problem. With the evolution of Generative AI, the focus has shifted towards integrating LLMs into workflows.

Across various sectors, from Agri-tech to Retail, there is a growing interest in developing conversational interfaces to promptly address inquiries. Whether the query is about attire for an event or determining the appropriate fertiliser for specific crops, LLMs are becoming increasingly relevant.

However, amidst this transition, the question arises, where should we begin? Herein lies the importance of an AI thinking process, which can serve as a guiding light.

4 stages of AI thinking

Here are the 4 stages of an AI thinking process explained in detail.

Identify

The first step is to identify use cases. Use cases typically originate from customers, and we need to make a careful consideration if the incorporation of AI can solve the core problem and further enhance the experience. In this step, we also need to figure out how we can leverage LLMs. LLMs can solve multiple problems ranging from language translation, text generation, and question answering to personalised recommendations, and many more. We must determine what specific tasks LLMs can solve and how they can be incorporated into the use case.

Validate

In this step, we need to figure out what is feasible to build. Can we deliver what the client expects? Do we have the required data to build an experience? Is the data good enough to consume? Is LLM capable of delivering what is expected? These questions can be best answered by conducting a POC (Proof of Concept), which is helpful as the experience can be shared with the client to obtain early feedback.

Build

In this step, we build the actual experience, and we fine tune the models to get relevant results. On the other hand, we adhere strictly to RAI (Responsible AI) guidelines. These guidelines ensure that the development process aligns with ethical principles and mitigates potential risks. By following RAI guidelines, we can create an experience that prioritizes transparency, fairness, accountability, and privacy while harnessing the power of AI technology.

Measure

Measuring AI experiences can be based on parameters such as relevance, completeness, accuracy, and recall [1]. This step is considered the most important in the AI thinking process, where the objective is to verify whether the experience can deliver the expected results. There are several popular benchmarks such as GLUE (General Language Understanding Evaluation), BLEU, and ROUGE. We can use these popular metrics or derive one relevant to your use cases.

Reference: [1 ]Debarag Banerjee, Pooja Singh, Arjun Avadhanam, Saksham Srivastava Benchmarking LLM powered Chatbots: Methods and Metrics (2023).

post authorAlipta Ballav

Alipta Ballav
A seasoned Design leader with over 2 decades of industry experience spanning across B2C and B2B working at the intersection of people, process, product.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The article outlines a paradigm shift from Design Thinking to AI Thinking, emphasizing the integration of LLMs into various sectors to enhance problem-solving through conversational interfaces.

Related Articles

Discover how personalization crosses the line from serving users to silently shaping them.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
The Ethics of Personalization: When UX Crosses the Line from Helpful to Harmful
  • The article argues that personalization walks a fine ethical line between empowering users and quietly manipulating them.
  • It exposes how over-filtering doesn’t just limit content; it limits identity, replacing user curiosity with algorithmic compliance.
  • The piece calls on UX practitioners to treat ethical personalization as a foundational responsibility: one that demands transparency, fairness, and respect for human dignity.
Share:The Ethics of Personalization: When UX Crosses the Line from Helpful to Harmful
4 min read

Learn why your users decide whether to stay or leave before they even understand your product.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
The Psychology of Onboarding: First Impressions Rule the Brain
  • The article argues that onboarding is not where users begin; it is where they decide whether to stay or leave.
  • It shows that most onboarding failures are not design problems; they are psychological ones.
  • The piece challenges designers to recognize that first impressions are cognitive anchors and that the brain rarely revises its judgments.
Share:The Psychology of Onboarding: First Impressions Rule the Brain
5 min read

Discover how “consent theater” manipulates the psychology of choice, and what ethical design should look like instead.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Consent Theater: Are Users Really in Control?
  • The article argues that digital consent mechanisms are designed to look ethical while engineering the opposite outcome.
  • It exposes how legal compliance and ethical design have become dangerously decoupled.
  • The piece challenges designers to recognize that user psychology can serve as a tool for empowerment or a means of manipulation — the choice is theirs.
Share:Consent Theater: Are Users Really in Control?
8 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and