Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Things UX People Like ›› From Design Thinking to AI Thinking

From Design Thinking to AI Thinking

by Alipta Ballav
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Traditional Design thinking has laid the foundation for how problems are approached and addressed. It is still considered a valuable tool to address a problem. With the evolution of Generative AI, the focus has shifted towards integrating LLMs into workflows.

Across various sectors, from Agri-tech to Retail, there is a growing interest in developing conversational interfaces to promptly address inquiries. Whether the query is about attire for an event or determining the appropriate fertiliser for specific crops, LLMs are becoming increasingly relevant.

However, amidst this transition, the question arises, where should we begin? Herein lies the importance of an AI thinking process, which can serve as a guiding light.

4 stages of AI thinking

Here are the 4 stages of an AI thinking process explained in detail.

Identify

The first step is to identify use cases. Use cases typically originate from customers, and we need to make a careful consideration if the incorporation of AI can solve the core problem and further enhance the experience. In this step, we also need to figure out how we can leverage LLMs. LLMs can solve multiple problems ranging from language translation, text generation, and question answering to personalised recommendations, and many more. We must determine what specific tasks LLMs can solve and how they can be incorporated into the use case.

Validate

In this step, we need to figure out what is feasible to build. Can we deliver what the client expects? Do we have the required data to build an experience? Is the data good enough to consume? Is LLM capable of delivering what is expected? These questions can be best answered by conducting a POC (Proof of Concept), which is helpful as the experience can be shared with the client to obtain early feedback.

Build

In this step, we build the actual experience, and we fine tune the models to get relevant results. On the other hand, we adhere strictly to RAI (Responsible AI) guidelines. These guidelines ensure that the development process aligns with ethical principles and mitigates potential risks. By following RAI guidelines, we can create an experience that prioritizes transparency, fairness, accountability, and privacy while harnessing the power of AI technology.

Measure

Measuring AI experiences can be based on parameters such as relevance, completeness, accuracy, and recall [1]. This step is considered the most important in the AI thinking process, where the objective is to verify whether the experience can deliver the expected results. There are several popular benchmarks such as GLUE (General Language Understanding Evaluation), BLEU, and ROUGE. We can use these popular metrics or derive one relevant to your use cases.

Reference: [1 ]Debarag Banerjee, Pooja Singh, Arjun Avadhanam, Saksham Srivastava Benchmarking LLM powered Chatbots: Methods and Metrics (2023).

post authorAlipta Ballav

Alipta Ballav
A seasoned Design leader with over 2 decades of industry experience spanning across B2C and B2B working at the intersection of people, process, product.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The article outlines a paradigm shift from Design Thinking to AI Thinking, emphasizing the integration of LLMs into various sectors to enhance problem-solving through conversational interfaces.

Related Articles

Discover how the future of AI runs on purpose-built infrastructure.

Article by UX Magazine Staff
AI Agent Runtimes in Dedicated Lanes: Lessons from China’s EV Roads
  • The article states that AI’s progress depends less on creating larger models and more on developing specialized “lanes” (agent runtimes) where AI can run safely and efficiently.
  • It argues that, like China’s EV-only highways, these runtimes are designed for smooth flow, constant energy (through memory and context), and safe, reliable operation, much like EV-only highways in China.
  • The piece concludes that building this kind of infrastructure takes effort and oversight, but it enables AI systems to work together, grow, and improve sustainably.
Share:AI Agent Runtimes in Dedicated Lanes: Lessons from China’s EV Roads
4 min read

Learn when to talk to users, and when to watch them in order to uncover real insights and design experiences that truly work.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
  • The article distinguishes between usability tests and focus groups, highlighting their different roles in UX research.
  • It explains that focus groups gather opinions and attitudes, while usability tests observe real user behavior to find design issues.
  • The piece stresses using each method at the right stage to build the right product and ensure a better user experience.
Share:Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
2 min read

Explore how interaction data uncovers hidden user-behavior patterns that drive smarter product decisions, better UX, and continuous improvement.

Article by Srikanth R
The Power of Interaction Data: Tracking User Behavior in Modern Web Apps
  • The article explains how interaction data like clicks, scrolls, and session patterns reveals real user behavior beyond basic analytics.
  • It shows how tools such as heatmaps and session replays turn this data into actionable insights that improve UX and product decisions.
  • The piece emphasizes using behavioral insights responsibly, balancing optimization with user privacy and ethical data practices.
Share:The Power of Interaction Data: Tracking User Behavior in Modern Web Apps
14 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and