The Community Of Over 578,000

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› Ethnography in Industry: Objectives?

Ethnography in Industry: Objectives?

by Victoria Bellotti, PARC
Share this post on
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook
Share on reddit
Share on email
Share on print


An examination of the business value of ethnography in user-center technology.

This article was contributed by PARC (Palo Alto Research Center, Inc.) as part of an ongoing series in UX Magazine. Visit the PARC website to learn more about PARC’s current work and how to work with them, and to read other posts and publications by PARC scientists.

I—and I imagine you—have encountered a lot of confusion, and misconceptions, about ethnography. Especially relative to the many methods that can be used to inform technology design. This article is the first of a series intended to clarify a few things about this methodology.

What is ethnography?

First: there are some helpful definitions that can be found through a simple search.

In case you’re in a hurry, I’ll also summarize it (albeit inadequately, no doubt) for you: a holistic, in-person, and qualitative approach to the study of human behavior and interaction in natural settings.

But rather than expound on the semantic aspects of ethnography in my very first article here, I’d really rather respond to the obvious and eminently reasonable question I often hear in my work as a researcher in the field of user-centered technology innovation:

“What’s it good for, in my business?”

Ethnography adapted for industry

In today’s hard-nosed and often economically trying times, ethnography can be seen as a tactical weapon enabling companies to gather new insights and thus gain advantage over their competition.

Traditional ethnographic studies were conducted at a relatively leisurely pace. They had, at least as far as I can tell, no particular useful or focused objectives other than to uncover as much as possible about a culture or practice of interest in an unfettered manner. (Indeed, having an explicit agenda was considered to be rather bad form and was liable to get you kicked out of polite ethnographic circles…wherever those might have been.)

Out of the academic Garden of Eden, modern ethnographers have been driven to move and produce compelling results faster, while operating within a number of budgetary constraints and oft-conflicting business demands.

Ethnographers’ data collection and analysis methods have therefore been condensed, recombined, adapted—both systematically and as-needed—to meet these business demands. We’ll describe the methods to this madness in our next article, but in this article I categorized some of the commercial objectives for which these methods are applied.

Objectives for ethnography in industry

There are many practical applications of ethnographic methods in commercial contexts, particularly those that involve technology and workscape innovation (which is what my colleagues and I are most approached about).

Because there is considerable confusion about these applications, I want to propose a simplified classification of purposes to which ethnography can be applied.

Engage in opportunity discovery.

  • For innovating products and solutions, the objective might involve understanding the culture, practices, and needs for support within a particular workscape—for example, employees of a bank or a manufacturing plant.
  • For innovating or improving processes, the objective might involve identifying problems or undesirable phenomena in some setting that could be fixed by some organizational or procedural change—such as misunderstandings that lead to mistakes in satisfying customer requests in contact centers.

Sometimes, the goal is to understand the “big picture” (e.g., leisure outings with clients as part of the sales process). While these goals may seem open-ended on the surface, in industry settings one or more stakeholders always have an objective in mind (e.g., to understand the subtle returns on investing in leisure activities, since they can’t be captured in other ways).

  • For settings, the open-ended objective could be to understand the rich culture and variety of tacit and explicit practices within a particular workplace—those of bank or manufacturing plant employees, for example.
  • For activities, the open-ended objective might be to understand all tacit and explicit practices related to a particular role, practice, or function (such as contact center operations).
Gather information for a targeted purpose.
  • Diagnosing the cause and/or nature of one or more specific problems (such as employee dissatisfaction and high turnover in a company) or product failures (for example, why a certain hardware device is proving to be unpopular in its target market).
  • Identifying requirements that will inform the design of a specific product or enterprise solution—for example, what’s the best form factor for an e-reader targeted at executives and knowledge workers reading work-related content?
Test assumptions and/or evaluate performance.
  • Oriented towards practices, the test objective usually involves understanding the real vs. ideal execution of some role or process of interest—for example, if and why contact center operators aren’t following their script? An evaluation objective might be to assess performance in terms of some explicit values—for example, how satisfied is the customer, or, how often does a store assistant get the customer’s order wrong?
  • Oriented towards usage, the test objective may be to understand the real uses of some artifact or product “in the wild,” as opposed to how it was designed to be used—how are people really using photocopiers, for example? (This was famously studied by Lucy Suchman at PARC in the 1970’s, which is when the notion of corporate ethnography started to take off). An example of an assessment-oriented objective here might be: how quickly or smoothly can someone perform a task with a specific device?
Transfer or create ethnographic methods/ competencies.

This is an area PARC uniquely specializes in, and gets numerous requests for (particularly from foreign corporations who seek to differentiate themselves from their upstart competitors).

  • The didactic objective might involve some sort of learning-by-doing (where we scaffold analysts or employees in practicing the methods themselves), or some demonstration (where we illustrate methods and their value to those who want to learn their value).
  • Finally, there is also reflexive methods development, where one develops and tries out new ethnographic methods in practice by trying them out and refining them based on ongoing experiences and findings. This is something we constantly customize to meet specific study objectives and continually evolve the field.

Mapping objectives—often in the plural

I would caution that there are definitely some nuances in how you customize, combine, and apply ethnographic and other related methods to suit specific needs that I didn’t have time to go into here—this list is not complete and represents a simplified classification. My intention was to explicate and delineate the diverse objectives behind ethnographic studies that I’ve experienced at PARC.

But don’t assume that there can’t be multiple objectives for any given ethnographic study. The opportunity to glean field insights is rare, so it might as well serve multiple objectives at once—as long as one doesn’t dilute focus in attempting to answer every possible question.

And of course, there are always high-level objectives such as “give Apple a run for their money” or “make our company look more intelligent”. The art of an experienced ethnographer is knowing how to map the general classification above on to business leaders’ particular desires.

This article is Copyright © 2010 Palo Alto Research Center Incorported, All Rights Reserved.

post authorVictoria Bellotti

Victoria Bellotti, Victoria Bellotti manages Palo Alto Research Center's (PARC's) Socio-Technical and Interaction Research team at PARC where she also developed PARC's Opportunity Discovery research targeting methods and program. Victoria studies people to understand their practices, problems, and requirements for future technology, and also designs and analyzes human-centered systems—focusing on user experience. Best known for her research on personal information management and task management, Victoria has more recently been focusing on user-centered design of context- and activity-aware computing systems. Her previous work at London University UK, The British Government's Department of Trade and Industry, EuroPARC, and Apple encompasses domains such as transportation, process control, computer-mediated communication, collaboration, and ubiquitous computing. Dr. Bellotti received her Ph.D. in Human Computer Interaction from Queen Mary and Westfield College, an M.S. in Ergonomics and a B.S. in Psychology from University College, both in London . She is a co-inventor on 7 patents and 13 patent applications and an author or co-author on ~50 papers and book chapters, many of which are regularly cited by other experts.

post authorPARC

PARC, A premier center for commercial innovation, PARC, a Xerox company, is in the business of breakthroughs. We work closely with global enterprises, entrepreneurs, government agencies and partners, and other clients to invent, co-develop, and bring to market game-changing innovations by combining imagination, investigation, and return on investment for our clients. For 40 years, we have lived at the leading edge of innovation, merging inquiry and strategy to pioneer technological change. PARC was incorporated in 2002 as a wholly owned independent subsidiary of Xerox Corporation—enabling us to continue pioneering technological change but across a broader set of industries and clients today.

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook
Share on reddit
Share on email
Share on print

Related Articles

The road to a good customer experience can be full of potholes. How do you navigate such a treacherous path? One key way is through product thinking.

What is product thinking and why does it matter?
  • Product thinking is key to shaping the best customer experience possible as it helps to identify problems and solve them.
  • By providing a holistic perspective on a product it differs from design thinking and reveals the real product value for customers.
  • Because of its strategic importance, every team member should hone product thinking skills. It’s more than a working framework, it’s a mindset, a culture of customer experience.
Share:What is product thinking and why does it matter?

“Holistic design” sounds like a new flashy trend that’s used without a real meaning behind it. However, the term was present long before UX design was born. Nowadays, when we use “product design” for digital products and “industrial design” for things, “holistic design” makes a comeback to UX design.

What Is Holistic Design? The Future of UX or a Buzzword?
  • To apply holistic design principles is to consider different facets of a product, stakeholders’ interests and the environment within which it functions.
  • Best practices of holistic design consist of involving stakeholders, being sustainable, creating an ecosystem, and, last but not least, going beyond digital.
  • When it comes to holistic design in UX, it’s essential to apply design thinking and reflect on the design system, make sure that solutions are inclusive and consistently invest in UX research.
Share:What Is Holistic Design? The Future of UX or a Buzzword?
Frame 1 Holistic Design

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and