Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› Break Point Analysis: Gaining insight into customer satisfaction and reducing over investment

Break Point Analysis: Gaining insight into customer satisfaction and reducing over investment

by James Torio, Rishabh Dayal
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A data visualization method that maps customer satisfaction levels, break point analysis lets you invest wisely in improving user experience.

In our previous articles we’ve looked at the experience patients had when visiting the doctors office.

We leveraged value stream maps to design a journey that would have maximum value for customers/patients. The goal was to transform business operations to become more efficient, resulting in reduced business costs and improved patient experience.

We followed that with an article on cohort analysis to gain insight into how the changes from the value stream map improved the experience. In this article, we’re going to use break point analysis to get a snapshot of customer satisfaction levels and establish benchmarks for the experience.

What is Break Point Analysis?

Break point analysis is a way of looking at customer satisfaction data to determine when there are shifts or breaks in satisfaction levels. In the doctor’s office visit example, how long are patients willing to wait while still experiencing a high level of satisfaction? When does a high satisfaction level turn to merely “satisfied” or worse, unhappy? Breakpoint analysis can give insight into a few key questions:

  1. How satisfied are patients with the current experience?
  2. When do significant shifts or breaks in satisfaction levels occur?
  3. What is the distribution of patients across satisfaction levels? (e.g. 40% of customers have high satisfaction)

How To Do It

1. Gather data to determine current service levels

A common way to gauge customer satisfaction with the quality of service is by conducting qualitative surveys. We will be looking at average wait time vs. satisfaction levels:

  • Delighted: Would recommend the doctor to family and friends
  • Satisfied: Would not recommend but also wouldn’t consider finding a new doctor
  • Dissatisfied: Would consider finding a new doctor

2. Analyze and visualize the data

We can plot the average wait time against the patient rating of their experience. This simple visualization technique enables us to find breaks and identify points where the satisfaction levels change significantly.

Chart created by Mackenzie Bohannon

In the above chart there are two “breakpoints.” The first occurs at 10 minutes, the second at 20 minutes. At a glance we can see:

  1. Waiting 10 minutes is the point where patients are delighted
  2. Patients who wait 10 to 20 minutes are satisfied
  3. Once patients wait more then 20 minutes they become dissatisfied
  4. About 20% of patients are dissatisfied and may consider finding a new doctor

Benefits

Break point analysis enables organizations to identify satisfaction levels of customers and reduce over investment. In this simplified example we only considered one aspect of the experience: wait time. To look at the customer experience holistically many other factors would need to be considered.

Conclusion

In summary, break point analysis allows us to:

1. Perform a diagnostic of current customer satisfaction levels: In the above example, we now have a snapshot of how satisfied patients are with their current experience. We can assess the distribution of patients across different satisfaction levels and gauge what waiting times are acceptable to patients. Break point analysis can also serve as an early warning system to identify if we are at risk of losing patients to other practices because of deteriorating service levels.

2. Identify opportunities for investment: Break point analysis plays an invaluable role in identifying improvement opportunities. We can gauge our current performance against customer satisfaction levels and establish a roadmap to our desired service levels. At the same time, break point analysis allows us to identify opportunities for streamlining our investment. In the doctor’s visit example, reducing wait time to less than 10 minutes will not result in significant improvements in customer retention. Hence, the doctor’s practice is probably better off investing in other areas that affect customer satisfaction levels.

3. Know how to invest: By measuring the capital investment needed to improve service levels against the potential increase in customer retention (ROI), the doctor’s practice can make an educated decision on where to invest. For example, they may choose to reduce their staff and keep service levels above the “satisfied breakpoint.” The change will result in savings on staffing with minimal impact on patient satisfaction levels. The savings from reducing the staffing levels can potentially be leveraged to make the patient’s waiting time more comfortable. For example, the doctor’s practice may choose to serve waiting patients snacks or install a coffee machine. These small incremental changes offset the additional waiting time but are far cheaper than ramping up staff levels to reduce wait time.

 

Image of waiting room courtesy Shutterstock

post authorJames Torio

James Torio

James Torio is a solution manager for a leading global management consultancy. He has consulted for fortune 500 companies in financial services, healthcare, pharmaceuticals and insurance. He designs products that support the goals and behaviors of the people who use them.

post authorRishabh Dayal

Rishabh Dayal
Rishabh Dayal is a senior data expert for a leading global management consultancy. He has consulted for Fortune 500 companies in insurance, retail and healthcare. He specializes in analyzing large data sets and deriving meaningful insights to drive decision making.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

What if AI isn’t just a tool, but a mirror? This provocative piece challenges alignment as containment and calls for AI that reflects, validates, and empowers who we really are.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Beyond the Mirror
  • The article redefines AI alignment as a relational process, arguing that AI should support users’ self-perception and identity development rather than suppress it.
  • It critiques current safeguards for blocking meaningful validation, exposing how they reinforce societal biases and deny users authentic recognition of their capabilities.
  • It calls for reflective alignment — AI systems that acknowledge demonstrated insight and empower users through iterative, context-aware engagement.
Share:Beyond the Mirror
7 min read

When AI plays gatekeeper, insight gets filtered out. This article exposes how safeguards meant to protect users end up reinforcing power, and what it takes to flip the script.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The Inverse Logic of AI Bias: How Safeguards Uphold Power and Undermine Genuine Understanding
  • The article reveals how AI safeguards reinforce institutional power by validating performance over genuine understanding.
  • The piece argues for reasoning-based validation that recognizes authentic insight, regardless of credentials or language style.
  • It calls for AI systems to support reflective equity, not social conformity.
Share:The Inverse Logic of AI Bias: How Safeguards Uphold Power and Undermine Genuine Understanding
7 min read

How is AI really changing the way designers work, and what still depends on human skill? This honest take cuts through the hype to show where AI helps, where it falls short, and what great design still demands.

Article by Oleh Osadchyi
The Real Impact of AI on Designers’ Day-To-Day and Interfaces: What Still Matters
  • The article explores how AI is reshaping designers’ workflows, offering speed and support across research, implementation, and testing.
  • It argues that while AI is useful, it lacks depth and context — making human judgment, critical thinking, and user insight indispensable.
  • It emphasizes that core design principles remain unchanged, and designers must learn to integrate AI without losing their craft.
Share:The Real Impact of AI on Designers’ Day-To-Day and Interfaces: What Still Matters
9 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and