Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› Change Blindness

Change Blindness

by Michael Grossman
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

What are you paying attention to, and what are you missing?

Change Blindness

Depending on what we focus on, our brains can be completely blind to obvious changes going on around us. This is called “change blindness,” and it is unnerving when you observe it. Below are a few examples of this in action.

This first video is an experiment conducted at Harvard where 75% of the people in the test don’t notice that the man in front of them has turned into a different person. This was conducted in a formal test setting. The people involved were interviewed after the experiment to better understand their perception of events.

This next video shows change blindness being used as more of a parlor trick. Magician Derren Brown exploits this blind spot in a much more dramatic way. Changing clothes, race, and gender doesn’t seem to matter to these people on the street. This demonstration isn’t as controlled, but is a lot of fun to watch.

The last video is an “Awareness Test” that has been around for a while. You can run this test on yourself and on others.

The concept of change blindness highlights a potential problem for UX professionals. Most of the time, user researchers and UX architects begin their research with specific goals in mind, and are focused on a specific aspect of the product. But with this focus comes the risk that they will be blind to other aspects of the user’s experience. What are we failing to capture when observing people using the products we design? We need to reserve space in our work for uncovering those things that we don’t know we don’t know, and make it an official part of the process. We will observe more of the moonwalking bears that teach us valuable lessons about our users and our products.

post authorMichael Grossman

Michael Grossman

Michael merged his skills in graphic design and multimedia into a career in User Experience Design after graduating with a B.S. in Jazz in 1989. He has delivered projects for clients including Kenneth Cole, Merrill Lynch, Apple, Time Warner, NFL Properties, AOL, Toshiba and W&R Grace. He has spent the last 20 years designing great experiences. Visit his UX Blog, his website, or follow him on Twitter.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Discover why the points, badges, and streaks in your favorite apps aren’t really gamification.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
  • The piece claims that most apps misuse gamification, copying superficial mechanics like points and badges that trick rather than motivate people, and that the experience itself is what truly drives engagement, just like good games do.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
4 min read

Learn why the real design challenge of agile is not speed but learning to design smaller, one valuable slice at a time.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Designing Small Is Harder than Designing Big
  • The article suggests that agile design is not about quick development but rather the more difficult discipline of designing smaller, resisting the temptation to map out complete systems, avoiding the snare of horizontal slicing, and inquiring into what the smallest iteration of an idea is that still provides real value to users.
Share:Designing Small Is Harder than Designing Big
5 min read

Find out how clicking “Accept All” is not really consent and how ethical UX design can return user choice to users.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Consent Fatigue: Are We Designing People into Compliance?
  • The article shows that consent fatigue is not a user problem but a design problem in which endless permission popups, visual manipulation, and legal-shield thinking have quietly replaced real user autonomy with engineered compliance.
Share:Consent Fatigue: Are We Designing People into Compliance?
10 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and