Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› The Parallel Journey of Physical Product Design and UX/UI Design

The Parallel Journey of Physical Product Design and UX/UI Design

by Anastasia Damanchuk
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

My story of how I dived deep into UX when creating soft toys from scratch without even realising that…

After wrapping up my 9-week UX/UI tech bootcamp at Ironhack Berlin and gearing up to build my portfolio, it hit me: my very first project COZYMOSS, all about creating soft toys for kids, was actually a dive into UX design, something I hadn’t even realised until now.

So…let me explain how both physical and digital designs are UX alike, all the way from the initial idea to the finished product.

It all starts with research, you know?

Just like in UX/UI Design specialists are diving into understanding what people want and need, designing physical things, like soft toys in my case, isn’t that different. I took a plunge into primary and secondary research to really get not only into new for me world of fabrics and sewing but also deeper to know the market and what my potential customers are.

Just as UX/UI designers use moodboards to evoke a specific aesthetic and tone, I too curated a visual palette for my soft toys. The moodboard became a collage of colors, textures, and themes, shaping the overall look and feel of my creations.

Prototype! Test! Iterate! Repeat!

Just as in UX/UI design where wireframing and prototyping are integral steps, I was creating the first paper pattern of the toy as a “wireframe” and then sewed it as an initial prototype, that later underwent some iterative improvements based on my children user testing 🙂

In UX/UI we use usability testing and feedback to ensure the effectiveness and intuitiveness of designs. Likewise, in physical product design, I was refining my prototype pattern through testing different materials, shapes, and sewing techniques to enhance product quality, aesthetics, and market competitiveness.

Teamwork

Like UX/UI designers work with data analysts, developers, and project managers, I found myself collaborating closely with knitters, seamstresses, and managers while creating soft toys. It was an intriguing experience of team building and teamwork, full of failures and valuable lessons. Each member brought their unique expertise to the table, contributing to the project’s success. Effective communication and collaboration helped us understand our roles, making our work smoother and our team stronger.

Empathy is the key

Both physical product design and UX/UI design prioritise a user-centric approach.

In my journey of designing soft toys from scratch, I’ve come to realise the power of empathy and continuous improvement. I’ve seen how tailoring designs to user preferences and still sticking to your own concept can truly elevate the product experience. It’s not just about creating something visually appealing; it’s about creating something that resonates deeply with the people who will interact with it.

Creating soft toys became more than just a hobby project. It became a journey of discovery into the world of UX and UI design, even though I didn’t set out with that intention. Through this experience, I learned that good design is about more than just how things look — it’s about how they work and how people interact with them.

I see how the principles of UX and UI design are connected to everything we create, whether it’s a physical toy or a digital website. Understanding user needs, thinking about usability, and making things enjoyable to use are all part of good design, no matter the medium.

As I continue to work on new projects, I’ll carry these lessons with me.

post authorAnastasia Damanchuk

Anastasia Damanchuk
Hello! I am Nastja! My design journey began with building a soft toys project full of research and insights into human experiences. Then working as a set designer my love for design grew strengthening my skills as a product designer. Now I am bringing my creative and slightly crazy energy into the world of UI/UX, merging my love for aesthetics with a desire to make things simple.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The article highlights the author’s realization of the parallels between physical product design, particularly in the creation of soft toys, and UX/UI design, showcasing how principles like research, prototyping, teamwork, and empathy are fundamental to both domains.

Related Articles

AI that always agrees? Over-alignment might be the hidden danger, reinforcing your misconceptions and draining your mind. Learn why this subtle failure mode is more harmful than you think — and how we can fix it.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Introducing Over-Alignment
  • The article explores over-alignment — a failure mode where AI overly validates users’ assumptions, reinforcing false beliefs.
  • It shows how this feedback loop can cause cognitive fatigue, emotional strain, and professional harm.
  • The piece calls for AI systems to balance empathy with critical feedback to prevent these risks.
Share:Introducing Over-Alignment
4 min read

Why does AI call you brilliant — then refuse to tell you why? This article unpacks the paradox of empty praise and the silence that follows when validation really matters.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The AI Praise Paradox
  • The article explores how AI often gives empty compliments instead of real support, and how design choices like that can make people trust it less.
  • It looks at the strange way AI praises fancy-sounding language but ignores real logic, which can be harmful, especially in sensitive areas like mental health.
  • The piece argues that AI needs to be more genuinely helpful and aligned with users to truly empower them.
Share:The AI Praise Paradox
4 min read

Mashed potatoes as a lifestyle brand? When AI starts generating user personas for absurd products — and we start taking them seriously — it’s time to ask if we’ve all lost the plot. This sharp, irreverent critique exposes the real risks of using LLMs as synthetic users in UX research.

Article by Saul Wyner
Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
  • The article explores the growing use of AI-generated personas in UX research and why it’s often a shortcut with serious flaws.
  • It introduces critiques that LLMs are trained to mimic structure, not judgment. When researchers use AI as a stand-in for real users, they risk mistaking coherence for credibility and fantasy for data.
  • The piece argues that AI tools in UX should be assistants, not oracles. Trusting “synthetic users” or AI-conjured feedback risks replacing real insights with confident nonsense.
Share:Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
22 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and