Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› Role of Semiotics in Design Thinking & UX Design

Role of Semiotics in Design Thinking & UX Design

by Priya Dubey
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

LeadBannerSemiotics

“Signs that burn like shooting stars

 That pass across the night-time skies

 They reach out in their mystic language

 For us to read between the lines”

As I hear Neil Diamond crooning these lines from his song ‘Signs’; my thoughts dwelled upon how the study of Semiotics and Ethnography and how it has gained importance in Design. While Semiotics is the study of signs & sign processes to signify or communicate, Ethnography deals with the systematic study of people and cultures. Thus the combined study of both can be termed as Ethno-semiotics. It allows User Experience Designers to better understand personas while discovering their meaning-ecosystems and their story, to arrive at what resonates with them culturally. The world is getting smaller and therefore designers need to assimilate & understand information about complex cultural data. They need to identify the meanings behind different signs that make people different from each other or that which draws them to one other. Also, there is a need for designers to break the cultural barriers as effective communication has become important due to globalization.

We are exposed to plenty of sensorial stimuli in our everyday living. Sometimes we are not even aware that we are being influenced by these at a deeper level and changing how we perceive the experiences in the world around us. It is said that the best designs are the ones that are not noticed by the users at all. Designers, therefore, have to seamlessly integrate the signs, symbols, words, imagery, a sound, a smell, or even taste that makes sense to someone in their cultural context.

Designers are expected to deliver User Experience Design that has a universal appeal if the design is to be used globally like how Facebook uses the thumbs-up button for ‘like’, the red heart-shaped button for ‘love’, and so on. Likewise, if the design is region-specific and for a particular group of people of a specific ethnicity, they can then exercise the liberty of using ethnic symbolism, phrases, or other such culture-specific communication or indicators that resonate with that group of people. Like the usage of ‘Hinglish’ (mix of Hindi & English), which is easily understood by the urban Indian population, for designing signage for a hip upscale bar chain operating in Indian metros.

It is thus vital to unearth the subconscious cultural patterns users use to find meaning around them and to understand how something is perceived by the target group to create effective UX design. Thus, semiotic analysis is one of the most powerful research methodologies to engage in communication, UX Design & Design thinking, as it finds patterns that connect symbols with the emotional and socio-cultural beliefs from the lives of user personas.

Fun story behind the Bluetooth symbol

bluetooth

Did you know that the Bluetooth logo is the old rune for H and B (for Harold Bluetooth)?

A Danish king, Harold Gormsson or Harald Blåtand (Harold Bluetooth, in English) from the 10th century Denmark. He was utterly fond of eating blueberries, and his tooth was always stained blue, which gave him the name. He was responsible for uniting the warring factions in parts of Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. Ericsson, the Swedish telecommunication technology company invented Bluetooth technology in 1994. Since this technology brought together and allowed connectivity between disparate products, in 1997 the name ‘Bluetooth’ was suggested for it to be trademarked. It was just a happy coincidence that the symbol of Bluetooth is a combination of two runes from the younger Futhark, which was the runic alphabet used by the Vikings then and it combined look a bit like a B!

To arrive at this symbol, they used the initials of Harald Bluetooth, to create what is called a bindrune. This bindrune is merging of his two initials that consist of the letter H (ᚼ) and the letter B (ᛒ). ᚼ is known as the Hagall rune, and ᛒ is the Bjarkan rune. Creating such a bind rune was something that was done in the Viking age, but it was not very commonly used. Thanks to technological penetration, everyone in the world is quite familiar with this old bind rune now known as the Bluetooth logo!

translation
equation

Wouldn’t it be more interesting then, if we can thus weave new with the old and find new meanings with symbols and it’s context?

post authorPriya Dubey

Priya Dubey

Priya Dubey combines her UX Design skills, with her prior experience in brand management & content strategy, to create delightful and intuitive designs. Keen interest in Design Thinking and how it can change the world for the better. She is also an artist and writer. You can reach her on twitter @Pridub. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI that always agrees? Over-alignment might be the hidden danger, reinforcing your misconceptions and draining your mind. Learn why this subtle failure mode is more harmful than you think — and how we can fix it.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Introducing Over-Alignment
  • The article explores over-alignment — a failure mode where AI overly validates users’ assumptions, reinforcing false beliefs.
  • It shows how this feedback loop can cause cognitive fatigue, emotional strain, and professional harm.
  • The piece calls for AI systems to balance empathy with critical feedback to prevent these risks.
Share:Introducing Over-Alignment
4 min read

Why does AI call you brilliant — then refuse to tell you why? This article unpacks the paradox of empty praise and the silence that follows when validation really matters.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The AI Praise Paradox
  • The article explores how AI often gives empty compliments instead of real support, and how design choices like that can make people trust it less.
  • It looks at the strange way AI praises fancy-sounding language but ignores real logic, which can be harmful, especially in sensitive areas like mental health.
  • The piece argues that AI needs to be more genuinely helpful and aligned with users to truly empower them.
Share:The AI Praise Paradox
4 min read

Mashed potatoes as a lifestyle brand? When AI starts generating user personas for absurd products — and we start taking them seriously — it’s time to ask if we’ve all lost the plot. This sharp, irreverent critique exposes the real risks of using LLMs as synthetic users in UX research.

Article by Saul Wyner
Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
  • The article explores the growing use of AI-generated personas in UX research and why it’s often a shortcut with serious flaws.
  • It introduces critiques that LLMs are trained to mimic structure, not judgment. When researchers use AI as a stand-in for real users, they risk mistaking coherence for credibility and fantasy for data.
  • The piece argues that AI tools in UX should be assistants, not oracles. Trusting “synthetic users” or AI-conjured feedback risks replacing real insights with confident nonsense.
Share:Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
22 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and