Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Become a member
Home ›› Artificial Intelligence ›› Invisible Machines Podcast: High Risk and Lots of Experimentation

Invisible Machines Podcast: High Risk and Lots of Experimentation

by UX Magazine Staff
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Robb and Josh talk about the elevated levels of risk and experimentation required to move hyperautomation forward.

“I’ve heard this from a number of people: We don’t want to be Guinea pigs on any software. If you don’t want to be the Guinea pig, you’ve pretty much decided not to innovate … [soon] companies will be begging to be on the Guinea pig list.” — Robb Wilson

This and other insights are explored in episode three of the Invisible Machines podcast. Join OneReach.ai CEO and co-founder Robb Wilson and UXM contributing editor Josh Tyson as they explore the realms of conversational AI and hyperautomation.

Subscribe to UX Magazine wherever you listen to podcasts. You can also watch episodes on the Invisible Machines YouTube channel.

post authorUX Magazine Staff

UX Magazine Staff,

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

The Next Generation of Design is Inclusive

  • Accessibility, Design, Interaction Design, UX Magazine

MFA Interaction Design at the School of Visual Arts paves the way for more thoughtful future designers. 

Article by Brooke Viegut
IDEAS IN BRIEF
The Next Generation of Design is Inclusive
  • The article explores the MFA Interaction Design program at the School of Visual Arts, focusing on its emphasis on inclusive design principles and the impact of its innovative curriculum.
Read Article →
Share
Share:The Next Generation of Design is Inclusive
5 min read

No, AI User Research is Not “Better Than Nothing”—It’s Much Worse

  • Artificial Intelligence, Defining AI, Direct Observation Research, Research Methods and Techniques, The Evolution of Research

Synthetic insights are not research. They are the fastest path to destroy the margins on your product.

Article by Pavel Samsonov
IDEAS IN BRIEF
No, AI User Research is Not “Better Than Nothing”—It’s Much Worse
  • The article critiques the growing trend of substituting human-centered design processes with AI-generated insights, highlighting the potential pitfalls and implications for design quality and user experience.
Read Article →
Share
Share:No, AI User Research is Not “Better Than Nothing”—It’s Much Worse
6 min read

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    ✕

    Join 740,000 designers, thinkers, and doers.

    Become a member

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and

    Accept policy