Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Customer Experience ›› How To Empower An Organization Through Design?

How To Empower An Organization Through Design?

by Viktor Dopke
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

How to empower an organization through design?

There is a way to work with design to achieve real results and generate genuine power for an organization.

Design can generate positive changes and develop a business beyond expectations, but for that to happen, we need to understand some aspects that make it a useful tool for companies – and not a product in crisis.

There is a lot of beautiful content on the internet, but design as a decoration tool is not capable of promoting what an organization expects. Here are some reasons why design/branding/marketing agencies end up damaging the image of design as a results tool:

Best part is if it goes wrong, no one from outside can understand why. (ironic)

Lots of jargon and little to no action at a fundamental level.

You know that meeting where more than half of the guests are not part of the design team, but are forced to hear terms they don’t reckon, like heuristics, benchmark, etc? That’s because we often forget about the audience to which we are presenting our collective ideas, thus failing to explain how valuable they are to the stakeholders on call.

When this happens, the result is almost always another meeting or the total lack of interest by the organization’s to take part in the solution.

I have to admit i fell for some of them when I first started designing.

Large companies with “foolproof” processes.

These are large organizations (you might know some of them) that sell foolproof processes for working with design on the Internet. The problem with this method is that, each project is a new challenge, and the the processes we know can only be applied as a tool for the designer to make a project clearer and more objective, and not as a foolproof solution.

This one hurts me the most personally 🙂

Fake cases and invented touchpoints

Nowadays, it is easy to find projects in design portfolios that perform very well under a made up challenge that hasn’t seen any kind of validation or exposition to the market.

This creates a fake sense that that interface was the solution to the case. It also happens when organizations insist on using design as a stage for designers to gain recognition and reach, while their real customers don’t see results.

Romanticized view of consumers

A person’s behaviors and motivations are much more complex than we realize. The issue is that many organizations underestimate the consumer’s needs and romanticize the end user. The result of this stereotyping is blind solutions for users that do not exist, which do not generate any kind of value in the real market.

To escape this storm of bad examples, we need to go beyond the “decorative” vision that design offers and focus on what can generate power for a company.

How to empower an organization through design?

A successful design project is one capable of changing the reality of a company. According to Jaako Tammela, director of CX and design at DASA, design comes with the mission of putting people at the center of decisions, redesigning products and channels in a strategic and operational way. And many times the paths to the success of this redesign come understanding other sectors of a company.

Therefore, in order to centralize an organization, we need to map its interdependence relationships and understand how a project can strengthen all sectors in an equal way, making all operators able to give power to the design of that project.

But beware: when we influence an organization, it can have both good and bad consequences.

A design solution, for example, can be a blessing if it empowers all stakeholders, but a curse if it destroys the power of others, causing resistance, sabotage and boycotting the solution.

Interdependent relationships are more complex and human than just hierarchical levels. Sometimes the person responsible for making the project happen may not even be in the meeting. This is a classic case of resistance within an organization (Image credits: Mario Battaglini).

The curse happens when we reduce the role of a certain sector. In this case, we are negatively affecting an organization, generating resistance to that change. It may even cross your mind that you are not doing your job right or that the solution presented does not make sense, but often we are talking about a change that disregarded an important area within the company.

For this reason, when designing solutions for a system, it is important to empower all parts of the process, so that the project scales to all sectors, nurturing a culture of collaboration.

TLDR: to develop successful systems through design, you must have the opportunity to cause change from the inside out. The power of design comes from understanding the interpersonal dynamics of an organization and causing transformations that empower all stakeholders from the most technical level of an operation to the end consumer.

Credits:

Ricardo Martins (Future of design lecture)

Slava Shestopalov 🇺🇦(Inspired images)

Design Has the power of shaping reality (Estadão)

post authorViktor Dopke

Viktor Dopke

UX/UI Designer, Writer & Brand enthusiast. I design stuff that people love, meaning my grandma.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The author believes that the following reasons are why design/branding/marketing agencies end up damaging the image of design as a tool for getting results:
    • Lots of jargon and little to no action at a fundamental level.
    • Large companies with “foolproof” processes.
    • Fake cases and invented touch points
    • Romanticized view of consumers
  • In order to centralize an organization, designers need to map its interdependence relationships and understand how a project can strengthen all sectors in an equal way.

Related Articles

As AI takes on more of the solution work, the real craft of design shifts to how we frame the problem. This piece explores why staying with uncertainty and resisting the urge to rush to answers may be a designer’s most powerful skill.

Article by Morteza Pourmohamadi
The Frame, the Illusion, and the Brief
  • The article highlights that as AI takes over more of the solution work, the designer’s true craft lies in framing the problem rather than rushing to solve it.
  • It shows how cognitive biases like the need for closure or action bias can distort our perception, making careful problem framing essential for clarity and creativity.
  • The piece argues that framing is itself a design act — a practice of staying with uncertainty long enough to cultivate shared understanding and more meaningful outcomes.
Share:The Frame, the Illusion, and the Brief
3 min read

UX isn’t just about screens — it’s about feelings. This article explores why the future of UX depends on blending artificial and emotional intelligence to create truly human experiences.

Article by Krystian M. Frahn
UX is More Than Screens: The Art of Designing Emotions
  • The article shows how Steve Jobs’ shift from “form follows function” to “form follows emotion” transformed design into a deeply human practice centered on empathy.
  • It explains that emotions drive perception, usability, and loyalty — making emotional intelligence essential to meaningful user experiences.
  • The piece argues that the future of UX lies in uniting artificial and emotional intelligence to create technology that feels truly human.
Share:UX is More Than Screens: The Art of Designing Emotions
6 min read

Lean UX and User-Centered Design share the same heart — empathy for users — but differ in pace and practice. This piece shows how Lean UX turns UCD principles into a faster, data-driven approach for modern teams.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Lean UX vs. User-Centered Design
  • The article explains that while both Lean UX and User-Centered Design focus on users, Lean UX adapts UCD principles for speed, collaboration, and rapid learning.
  • It argues that Lean UX evolves user-centered thinking into an agile, data-driven process that helps teams design the right thing faster.
Share:Lean UX vs. User-Centered Design
3 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and