Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Good Design Vs. Good UX Design

Good Design Vs. Good UX Design

by Esther Pomerantz
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

GoodDesign_Slider

The idea of a product that is aesthetically pleasing being one that has a good user experience is a common misconception.

When you hear the term “UX Design”, you might conjure up mental images of well designed websites, apps or interfaces. You might picture their beautiful color palettes, engaging animations, or fresh layouts. While these aspects certainly can contribute to a great user experience, the idea of a product that is aesthetically pleasing being one that has a good user experience is a common misconception.

An interface that is well designed from a visual point of view will not necessarily be one that will provide a good user experience. In fact, often times a product will be designed a certain way in order for it to be visually appealing, yet this design will actively hinder the user’s experience.

Take the Apple Magic Mouse.

Just-complex-enough concept

While it certainly is designed well from a visual point of view, with its sleek, minimalistic design, it is not designed well from a user experience point of view. This is due to the fact that the re-chargeable mouse features a lighting port on its underside, making it a real challenge for the user to charge the mouse while using it. The lightening port was likely placed where it was in effort to compliment the design, yet this placement makes the experience of charging it frustrating.

Another example of this phenomenon is this air fryer.

Just-complex-enough concept
 

Although its modern look does look nice from an aesthetic point of view, if we take the user experience into account, it becomes evident that it is not designed well. Since the icons on the screen are not labeled, it can be difficult for the user to determine the actual functions of each option. While the icons were likely unlabeled to improve the look of the product, this lack of labeling can interfere with the experience of using it.

Yet another product that is not designed well from a user experience point of view is this cat mug.

Just-complex-enough concept
 

While the mug is certainly cute and creatively designed, its ears are positioned in a way that can poke the person drinking from it in the eyes, making it a user experience failure. Although the ears were added to the mug in order to make it look better, their positioning actually hinders the experience of drinking from it.

These examples illustrate that while a product may be designed well in that it is aesthetically pleasing, it can, in fact, be designed quite badly from a user experience perspective. Additionally, while a design decision may have been made in effort to make a product more visually appealing, this decision can ultimately render the product a user experience bust.

In essence, the purpose of UX design is to design products in a way that helps users be more successful at carrying out the things they are trying to accomplish. A product’s beautiful design will not be valued by its users if there is something getting in the way of them using it the way they want to. When designing products, we therefore want to ensure that the users are able to accomplish their goals in the optimal way, even if that way might not be the most aesthetically pleasing option.

post authorEsther Pomerantz

Esther Pomerantz

Esther Pomerantz is a UX/UI Designer who is passionate about employing design to help both people and businesses succeed. She believes that business problems are solved by addressing user problems and strives to continuously tackle those problems.  Follow her on Medium for more thought and ideas or reach out to her via LinkedIn.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Learn how one product designer built a faster, sharper workflow where AI does the scaffolding, judgment owns the outcome, and nothing ships without a traceable why.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
The Spiral Climbs: Ideas Are Expensive, Systems Are Cheap
  • The piece explores that design is no longer about designing screens but owning systems, bets, and outcomes. But the core judgment, empathy, and research are irreplaceable. I chain Miro, Figma, VS Code, GitHub, and Jira into one traceable loop from idea to learning. AI takes on the exploration and scaffolding. People own architecture, security, and accountability. A 48-hour operating cadence of small, measurable bets, linked artifacts, and documented decisions keeps speed honest.
Share:The Spiral Climbs: Ideas Are Expensive, Systems Are Cheap
6 min read

Discover why the points, badges, and streaks in your favorite apps aren’t really gamification.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
  • The piece claims that most apps misuse gamification, copying superficial mechanics like points and badges that trick rather than motivate people, and that the experience itself is what truly drives engagement, just like good games do.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
4 min read

Learn how your AI system can be failing silently while all dashboards are green and what it takes to actually see it.

Article by Kwansah Madani
AI Fails Silently: A Systems Perspective on AI Reliability
  • The article argues that AI systems don’t fail catastrophically, but rather degrade quietly, meaning that normal tools for detecting failure will miss the problem, and engineers need to rethink how they monitor system health from the ground up.
Share:AI Fails Silently: A Systems Perspective on AI Reliability
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and