Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› UX Design ›› From Guidance to Manipulation: the New Reality of UX

From Guidance to Manipulation: the New Reality of UX

by Disha Shenoy
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Today, digital products often push us in unintended directions. This article shows how modern UX is moving away from guidance to manipulation and challenges designers to confront an uncomfortable truth: are we designing for users or shaping their behavior for profit?

I miss the old UX. The kind that actually cared about making things easier, clearer, and more humane. The kind of design that felt on our side.

Today, it feels like something is changing. Scratch that. Something has changed.

More and more, UX in big tech is drifting away from helping users and moving toward something that feels a lot more uncomfortable. Instead of supporting what we want to do, many apps are quietly shaping what they want us to do.

And the shift is no longer subtle. It is right there in front of us, especially in apps like Instagram.

The Instagram update that tells the whole story

If you use Instagram often, you probably noticed their recent layout change. At first, it seems small. A tiny icon moved here or there. No big deal, right? But the placement is everything.

Instagram put Reels right between Home and Messages. That is exactly where your thumb naturally lands when you want to check your DMs.

Reels placed between Home and Messaging. Illustration by Disha Shenoy

So what happens?

  • You open the app.
  • Your thumb follows old muscle memory.
  • You think you are tapping Messages.
  • You suddenly fall into a Reels feed.
  • You spend way more time than you planned.

This is not a bug. It is not bad UX. It is a trap dressed as a redesign.

It is a design that nudges you into a behaviour that benefits the platform, not you.

When well-known UX principles get thrown out

Most UX designers were taught to:

  • Respect the user’s intent.
  • Avoid accidental actions.
  • Keep navigation consistent.
  • Reduce friction, not increase it.
  • Protect attention, not steal it.

But these principles only work when the business and the user want the same thing. And right now, they often do not.

So instead, we get UX that focuses on:

  • Pulling you back into the app.
  • Hijacking habits.
  • Using familiar gestures against you.
  • Creating loops you never meant to enter.

The dark part is that it is extremely effective. This is why so many apps keep doing it.

The attention economy changed UX forever

This is the uncomfortable truth. Your attention is not just attention anymore. It is revenue.

Your time equals profit. Your habits equal retention stats. Your scroll equals ad impressions.

So design starts to shift. Not toward what helps you, but toward what keeps you hooked.

And because these changes happen slowly and subtly, we adapt without noticing, which is exactly why they work so well.

Is it smart business or manipulation?

Here is the big question that many designers do not want to say out loud.

Is this clever product strategy, or is it manipulation wrapped in a clean UI?

On paper, it is brilliant. In reality, it feels wrong.

When a design intentionally leads us somewhere we did not choose to go, it stops being guidance and starts being control. It stops being design that supports us and becomes design that takes advantage of us.

Designers need to decide what side they are on

UX was built on empathy. On understanding people. On solving real problems.

But today, designers are stuck between two forces.

On one side is the user, trying to navigate life without being endlessly pulled into apps. On the other side is a business model that only grows if people stay glued to the screen.

So we have to ask ourselves:

  • Are we helping users, or are we hooking them?
  • Are we empowering them, or shaping them?
  • Are we solving problems, or adding new ones just to create engagement?

This is not a small choice. It defines the future of our entire field.

We can still bring UX back to what it should be

Here is the hopeful part. UX is not doomed.

At least, not yet.

Designers can still choose to stand for something better. We can choose clarity over trickery. We can choose real value over artificial engagement spikes. We can choose humans over metrics.

UX should feel like a handshake, not a trap. A guide, not a hook. A service, not a strategy.

It is time to start designing, as we remember that.

TLDR in points

  • UX in big tech is drifting from helping users to quietly manipulating them.
  • Instagram’s new layout puts Reels where Messages used to be, creating intentional “accidental” engagement.
  • This design is not an error; it is a behaviour trap.
  • Old UX principles like clarity and user intention are being replaced with retention-focused tactics.
  • The attention economy rewards apps for stealing time, not respecting it.
  • Designers now face a real ethical question about whether they are empowering users or exploiting them.
  • The future of UX depends on choosing humans over growth metrics.

The article originally appeared on LinkedIn.

Featured image courtesy: Krisztian Tabori.

post authorDisha Shenoy

Disha Shenoy
Disha Shenoy is a UX designer and researcher focused on ethical design, user behavior, and the evolving role of UX in shaping digital experiences. Her work explores the intersection of psychology, technology, and responsibility in product design, with a strong emphasis on user trust and the long-term impact of products.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The article shows how modern UX is moving from supporting users to subtly changing their behavior.
  • It uses Instagram’s layout change as an example of how habits are used to get people to interact with content more.
  • The piece suggests that designers now have to choose between helping users and following growth targets.

Related Articles

Explore the future of design: AI-powered interfaces that adapt, stay human-focused, and build trust.

Article by Aroon Kumar
Beyond UI/UX: Designing Adaptive Experiences in the Age of AI
  • The article discusses the shift from fixed interfaces to real-time experiences, switching the role of designers from creating screens to guiding how systems operate.
  • The piece also stresses that, as experiences become personalized, they must maintain user trust, privacy, and authentic human connection.
Share:Beyond UI/UX: Designing Adaptive Experiences in the Age of AI
5 min read

Discover why the best designers don’t try to be “unicorns,” but learn which lens they lead with and how to team up for real impact.

Article by Oliver West
The Three Lenses of UX: Because Not All UX Is the Same
  • The article suggests that UX isn’t one skill but three lenses: creativity, science, and business, and different roles naturally lead with different ones.
  • The piece illustrates that impact comes from identifying your skills and developing balanced teams, without trying to be excellent at everything.
Share:The Three Lenses of UX: Because Not All UX Is the Same
4 min read

Discover how ableism influences our interfaces and why real design begins with humanity, not assumptions.

Article by Tamara Sredojevic
Ableist Design: Challenging Systemic Norms
  • The article claims that design often defaults to an able-bodied “norm,” making exclusion a structural rather than an unwanted consequence.
  • It illustrates that accessibility mistakes come from assumptions: designers believe who the user is instead of investigating, researching, or involving Disabled people.
  • The piece highlights that accessibility must be built in from the start and seen as an ethical, collective responsibility rather than a specialized add-on or professional task.
Share:Ableist Design: Challenging Systemic Norms
24 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and