Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Designing a Future for AI Natives

Designing a Future for AI Natives

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

In a world increasingly influenced by artificial intelligence, understanding the nuances of language and communication is more crucial than ever. In this episode of Invisible Machines, Robb and Josh speak with Jieun Kiaer, Professor of Korean Linguistics at the University of Oxford.

In her new book, The Future of Syntax: Asian Perspectives in an AI Age, Jieun examines the intricate structures of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean languages, offering fresh insights that challenge traditional formal syntax. Notably, her work revisits Marc Prensky’s concept of “digital natives,” paving the way for a new generation of “AI natives” who have grown up in a world enriched by intelligent conversational technology.

During the conversation, they discuss the unique aspects of generative content detection in Asian languages, highlighting both the advantages and challenges that come with this rapid technological evolution. Jieun also shares perspectives from her extensive research on how gestures and non-verbal communication influence linguistics, along with her current work exploring Hallyu—the Korean wave of music, film, and television that has become a cultural and linguistic phenomenon globally.

Tune in and join the conversation as Robb, Josh, and Jieun navigate the complex relationship between language, culture, and technology!

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Forget chatbots — Agentic AI is redefining how work gets done. Discover the myths holding businesses back and what it really takes to build AI with true agency.

Article by Josh Tyson
Five Myths Debunked: Why Agentic AI Is Much More Than Chatbots
  • The article reframes Agentic AI not as a tool, but as a strategic approach to automating high-value tasks through orchestration and dynamic objectives.
  • It argues that success with Agentic AI lies in starting small, experimenting quickly, and integrating agents around outcomes — not traditional workflows.
  • The piece emphasizes the need for open, flexible platforms that enable multi-agent collaboration, rapid iteration, and seamless integration with legacy systems.
Share:Five Myths Debunked: Why Agentic AI Is Much More Than Chatbots
8 min read

What if you could build software just by talking to your computer? Welcome to vibe coding, where code takes a back seat and the vibe leads.

Article by Jacquelyn Halpern
Vibe Coding: Is This How We’ll Build Software in the Future?
  • The article introduces vibe coding, using AI to turn natural language into working code, and shows how this approach lets non-coders build software quickly and independently.
  • The piece lists key tools enabling vibe coding, like Cursor, Claude, and Perplexity, and notes risks like security, overreliance on AI, and the need for human oversight.
Share:Vibe Coding: Is This How We’ll Build Software in the Future?
7 min read

What if grieving your AI isn’t a sign of weakness, but proof it truly helped you grow? This article challenges how we think about emotional bonds with machines.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Grieving the Mirror: Informed Attachment as a Measure of AI’s True Utility
  • The article explores how people can form meaningful and healthy emotional connections with AI when they understand what AI is and isn’t.
  • It introduces the Informed Grievability Test — a way to tell if an AI truly helped someone grow by seeing how they feel if they lose access to it.
  • The piece argues that grieving an AI can be a sign of real value, not weakness or confusion, and calls for more user education and less overly protective design that limits emotional depth in AI tools.
Share:Grieving the Mirror: Informed Attachment as a Measure of AI’s True Utility
7 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and