Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Designing a Future for AI Natives

Designing a Future for AI Natives

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

In a world increasingly influenced by artificial intelligence, understanding the nuances of language and communication is more crucial than ever. In this episode of Invisible Machines, Robb and Josh speak with Jieun Kiaer, Professor of Korean Linguistics at the University of Oxford.

In her new book, The Future of Syntax: Asian Perspectives in an AI Age, Jieun examines the intricate structures of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean languages, offering fresh insights that challenge traditional formal syntax. Notably, her work revisits Marc Prensky’s concept of “digital natives,” paving the way for a new generation of “AI natives” who have grown up in a world enriched by intelligent conversational technology.

During the conversation, they discuss the unique aspects of generative content detection in Asian languages, highlighting both the advantages and challenges that come with this rapid technological evolution. Jieun also shares perspectives from her extensive research on how gestures and non-verbal communication influence linguistics, along with her current work exploring Hallyu—the Korean wave of music, film, and television that has become a cultural and linguistic phenomenon globally.

Tune in and join the conversation as Robb, Josh, and Jieun navigate the complex relationship between language, culture, and technology!

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Hiring is automated. The tools built to help you keep up are making it worse. There’s another way — one that puts your data, your drafts, and your decisions back in your hands.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
Job Search Terminal: A Local-First Tool for an AI-Shaped Job Market
  • The piece argues that most AI job search utilities deal with the wrong problem: they only lower barriers for candidates and perpetuate existing power imbalances.
  • It contends that the choice of local-first, people-centered tools is a political position on professional data ownership, not simply a technical decision.
Share:Job Search Terminal: A Local-First Tool for an AI-Shaped Job Market
5 min read

For researchers, AI tools are making the move from advising to building easier than ever. But the real obstacle was never technical. Meet the researchers who allowed themselves to create — and what the cost was.

Article by James Lang
The New Makers
  • The article says that becoming a maker as a researcher is less about learning new tools or skills and more about giving yourself a new identity, and that without fixing the internal permission structures that define your swim lane, even the most democratized AI tools won’t turn a researcher into a maker — you don’t have a founder; you have a frustrated advisor with a prototype.
Share:The New Makers
20 min read

Learn why authentic gamification is rooted in game genres rather than just collecting badges.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 5: Implementation
  • The article says that successful gamification is picking a game genre that fits your app’s core activities and user psychology, building satisfying intrinsic loops before adding extrinsic rewards, and iterating nonstop, and that without these foundations, you don’t have gamification; you have a progress bar that has a terminal point.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 5: Implementation
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and