Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Become a member

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Short News ›› The Google favicon

The Google favicon

by Constantinos Demetriadis
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

So Google decided to lay their cards down on the new favicon. Find out why they changed it and how you can help evolve the new favicon…

So Google decided to lay their cards down on the new favicon. Find out why they changed it and how you can help evolve the new favicon…

post authorConstantinos Demetriadis

Constantinos Demetriadis

Constantinos Demetriadis is a full time freelancer working from his personal digital design studio "Lovely Productions", basd in Athens, Greece.

In 1998 he earned his Bachelor of Arts in Industrial Design, but at the same time he got acquainted to the internet, which ultimately won his heart.

His professional career started when, in 1999, he started working for HellasNet as a Web Designer, and in a very short period he obtained the position of Art Director for FUTURENEED, a business unit of the same company. Since then he has been actively involved in numerous award winning projects, with the highlight in 2002 when he won the Ermis Gold and Grand Ermis for the site of Naftemporiki. Other awarded projects include the personal site of Demis Nikolaides (2003), FORTHnet’s portal site (2004) and the Ermis Awards site (2005).

His client roster includes BP, Coca-Cola, Lenovo, DHL, Interamerican, Naftemporiki and OTENET among others.

On a personal level, he has been involved in the creation and development of ProjectNeo, a Greek design community which launched in November 2000. In 2003 it was awarded an Ermis Gold in the Amateur / Non Commercial Sites category. ProjectNeo ended its journey in November 2005, when it reached a full 5 years in operation.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Has Digital Strategy Become A Synonym for Dark Pattern?

  • Design, Human factors, Privacy and Data Security, Short News, Strategy, UX Education

What started out as a joke became a personal observation of how creators and companies use dark patterns and explain it as a successful digital strategy. It seems that we are all alright with that and even applaud it. I think that needs to change.

Article by Robin Fransz
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Has Digital Strategy Become A Synonym for Dark Pattern?
  • The article sheds light on the pervasive use of dark patterns in digital design and challenges the acceptance and applause they receive.
  • With personal anecdotes and insights, the author underscores the need for change, ethical considerations, and data-driven decision-making to prioritize user advocacy.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Has Digital Strategy Become A Synonym for Dark Pattern?
4 min read

Merging Search and GPT3

  • Artificial Intelligence, Defining AI, Google

Breaking down the strengths and limitations of search engines and GPT-3 language models.

Article by Aydin Ozcekic
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Merging Search and GPT3
  • The author analyzes advancements in technology that have integrated search capabilities into chatbots for a more efficient user experience.
  • Comparing search and GPT3, it’s crucial to choose the technology that best fits the specific needs and goals of the user:
    • GPT-3 language model is content-centered, ideal for text-based information manipulation;
    • Search engines are best for point-to-point information retrieval.
  • The combination of chatbots and search engines can potentially cannibalize each other, leading to a double-edged sword scenario.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Merging Search and GPT3
5 min read

Google’s Dilemma (GPT3)

  • Artificial Intelligence, Google, Search, SEO, and SEM

What to expect from Google after a GPT3 solution release?

Article by Aydin Ozcekic
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Google’s Dilemma (GPT3)
  • Everyone is waiting for Google to respond to the GPT3 solution as Google possesses the necessary tools to develop the greatest AI solutions.
  • There is a significant distinction between the ways GPT3 and Google search operate:
    • GPT3 can access data and produce solutions while Google displays the best resources that might be available.
    • GPT3 is responsible for the answer it produces while Google is not.
    • GPT3 concentrates on producing the best possible response while Google anticipates your questions.
    • GPT3 represents the side of knowledge centralization while Google represents the diversity of knowledge.
  • According to the author, it’s crucial for Google to support websites that are the foundation of revenue and not change the way it works.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Google’s Dilemma (GPT3)
3 min read
✕

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

✕

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      ✕

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and

      Accept policy