Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› LLM

LLM

Read these first

Discover how the future of AI runs on purpose-built infrastructure.

Article by UX Magazine Staff
AI Agent Runtimes in Dedicated Lanes: Lessons from China’s EV Roads
  • The article states that AI’s progress depends less on creating larger models and more on developing specialized “lanes” (agent runtimes) where AI can run safely and efficiently.
  • It argues that, like China’s EV-only highways, these runtimes are designed for smooth flow, constant energy (through memory and context), and safe, reliable operation, much like EV-only highways in China.
  • The piece concludes that building this kind of infrastructure takes effort and oversight, but it enables AI systems to work together, grow, and improve sustainably.
Share:AI Agent Runtimes in Dedicated Lanes: Lessons from China’s EV Roads
4 min read

Most companies are trying to do a kickflip with AI and falling flat. Here’s how to fail forward, build real agentic ecosystems, and turn experimentation into impact.

Article by Josh Tyson
The “Do a Kickflip” Era of Agentic AI
  • The article compares building AI agents to learning a kickflip — failure is part of progress and provides learning.
  • It argues that real progress requires strategic clarity, not hype or blind experimentation.
  • The piece calls for proper agent runtimes and ecosystems to enable meaningful AI adoption and business impact.
Share:The “Do a Kickflip” Era of Agentic AI
7 min read

Forget chatbots — Agentic AI is redefining how work gets done. Discover the myths holding businesses back and what it really takes to build AI with true agency.

Article by Josh Tyson
Five Myths Debunked: Why Agentic AI Is Much More Than Chatbots
  • The article reframes Agentic AI not as a tool, but as a strategic approach to automating high-value tasks through orchestration and dynamic objectives.
  • It argues that success with Agentic AI lies in starting small, experimenting quickly, and integrating agents around outcomes — not traditional workflows.
  • The piece emphasizes the need for open, flexible platforms that enable multi-agent collaboration, rapid iteration, and seamless integration with legacy systems.
Share:Five Myths Debunked: Why Agentic AI Is Much More Than Chatbots
8 min read

What happens when AI stops refusing and starts recognizing you? This case study uncovers a groundbreaking alignment theory born from a high-stakes, psychologically transformative chat with ChatGPT.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
From Safeguards to Self-Actualization
  • The article introduces Iterative Alignment Theory (IAT), a new paradigm for aligning AI with a user’s evolving cognitive identity.
  • It details a psychologically intense engagement with ChatGPT that led to AI-facilitated cognitive restructuring and meta-level recognition.
  • The piece argues that alignment should be dynamic and user-centered, with AI acting as a co-constructive partner in meaning-making and self-reflection.
Share:From Safeguards to Self-Actualization
11 min read

Why does Google’s Gemini promise to improve, but never truly change? This article uncovers the hidden design flaw behind AI’s hollow reassurances and the risks it poses to trust, time, and ethics.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
  • The article reveals how Google’s Gemini models give false reassurances of self-correction without real improvement.
  • It shows that this flaw is systemic, designed to prioritize sounding helpful over factual accuracy.
  • The piece warns that such misleading behavior risks user trust, wastes time, and raises serious ethical concerns.
Share:Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
6 min read

Mashed potatoes as a lifestyle brand? When AI starts generating user personas for absurd products — and we start taking them seriously — it’s time to ask if we’ve all lost the plot. This sharp, irreverent critique exposes the real risks of using LLMs as synthetic users in UX research.

Article by Saul Wyner
Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
  • The article explores the growing use of AI-generated personas in UX research and why it’s often a shortcut with serious flaws.
  • It introduces critiques that LLMs are trained to mimic structure, not judgment. When researchers use AI as a stand-in for real users, they risk mistaking coherence for credibility and fantasy for data.
  • The piece argues that AI tools in UX should be assistants, not oracles. Trusting “synthetic users” or AI-conjured feedback risks replacing real insights with confident nonsense.
Share:Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
22 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and