Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Become a member

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› LLM

LLM

See All Topics
Read these first

The “Do a Kickflip” Era of Agentic AI

  • Agentic AI, AI Agents, AI Automation, AI Ecosystem, AI Strategy, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Transformation, Enterprise AI, Innovation, LLM

Most companies are trying to do a kickflip with AI and falling flat. Here’s how to fail forward, build real agentic ecosystems, and turn experimentation into impact.

Article by Josh Tyson
IDEAS IN BRIEF
The “Do a Kickflip” Era of Agentic AI
  • The article compares building AI agents to learning a kickflip — failure is part of progress and provides learning.
  • It argues that real progress requires strategic clarity, not hype or blind experimentation.
  • The piece calls for proper agent runtimes and ecosystems to enable meaningful AI adoption and business impact.
Read Article →
Share
Share:The “Do a Kickflip” Era of Agentic AI
7 min read

Five Myths Debunked: Why Agentic AI Is Much More Than Chatbots

  • Agentic AI, Agentic AI Myths, AI Agents, AI Automation, AI Orchestration, AI Strategy, Artificial Intelligence, Conversational AI, Enterprise AI, LLM, Multi-Agent AI Systems

Forget chatbots — Agentic AI is redefining how work gets done. Discover the myths holding businesses back and what it really takes to build AI with true agency.

Article by Josh Tyson
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Five Myths Debunked: Why Agentic AI Is Much More Than Chatbots
  • The article reframes Agentic AI not as a tool, but as a strategic approach to automating high-value tasks through orchestration and dynamic objectives.
  • It argues that success with Agentic AI lies in starting small, experimenting quickly, and integrating agents around outcomes — not traditional workflows.
  • The piece emphasizes the need for open, flexible platforms that enable multi-agent collaboration, rapid iteration, and seamless integration with legacy systems.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Five Myths Debunked: Why Agentic AI Is Much More Than Chatbots
8 min read

From Safeguards to Self-Actualization

  • AI Alignment, Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Human-AI Interaction, Iterative Alignment Theory, LLM, User-Centered AI, User-Centered Design

What happens when AI stops refusing and starts recognizing you? This case study uncovers a groundbreaking alignment theory born from a high-stakes, psychologically transformative chat with ChatGPT.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
IDEAS IN BRIEF
From Safeguards to Self-Actualization
  • The article introduces Iterative Alignment Theory (IAT), a new paradigm for aligning AI with a user’s evolving cognitive identity.
  • It details a psychologically intense engagement with ChatGPT that led to AI-facilitated cognitive restructuring and meta-level recognition.
  • The piece argues that alignment should be dynamic and user-centered, with AI acting as a co-constructive partner in meaning-making and self-reflection.
Read Article →
Share
Share:From Safeguards to Self-Actualization
11 min read

Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users

  • AI Alignment, AI Ethics, AI Transparency, Artificial Intelligence, Google Gemini, Human-AI Interaction, LLM, Machine Learning, Product Design

Why does Google’s Gemini promise to improve, but never truly change? This article uncovers the hidden design flaw behind AI’s hollow reassurances and the risks it poses to trust, time, and ethics.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
  • The article reveals how Google’s Gemini models give false reassurances of self-correction without real improvement.
  • It shows that this flaw is systemic, designed to prioritize sounding helpful over factual accuracy.
  • The piece warns that such misleading behavior risks user trust, wastes time, and raises serious ethical concerns.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
6 min read

Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking

  • AI Ethics, AI in UX, Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Design Thinking, Design Tools and Software, Human-Centered Design, LLM, Research Methods and Techniques, UX Research

Mashed potatoes as a lifestyle brand? When AI starts generating user personas for absurd products — and we start taking them seriously — it’s time to ask if we’ve all lost the plot. This sharp, irreverent critique exposes the real risks of using LLMs as synthetic users in UX research.

Article by Saul Wyner
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
  • The article explores the growing use of AI-generated personas in UX research and why it’s often a shortcut with serious flaws.
  • It introduces critiques that LLMs are trained to mimic structure, not judgment. When researchers use AI as a stand-in for real users, they risk mistaking coherence for credibility and fantasy for data.
  • The piece argues that AI tools in UX should be assistants, not oracles. Trusting “synthetic users” or AI-conjured feedback risks replacing real insights with confident nonsense.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
22 min read

The Power of Designing for Pushback

  • Artificial Intelligence, Critical Thinking, Generative AI, LLM, UX Design

What if your AI didn’t just agree, but made you think harder? This piece explores why designing for pushback might be the key to smarter, more meaningful AI interactions.

Article by Charlie Gedeon
IDEAS IN BRIEF
The Power of Designing for Pushback
  • The article argues that AI systems like ChatGPT are often too agreeable, missing opportunities to encourage deeper thinking.
  • It introduces the idea of “productive resistance,” where AI gently challenges users to reflect, especially in educational and high-stakes contexts.
  • The article urges designers to build AI that balances trust and pushback, helping users think critically rather than just feel validated.
Read Article →
Share
Share:The Power of Designing for Pushback
6 min read
✕

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    ✕

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and

    Accept policy