Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Personas ›› UX Personas are Useless. Unless Created Properly

UX Personas are Useless. Unless Created Properly

by Adam Fard
5 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Here’s the deal. Documentation is only useful if it’s used. Additionally, the contents of documentation need to be useful as well. Seems pretty obvious, right? We wish it were that simple. Any sort of persona documentation, in our experience, is more often than not utterly useless. That’s not to say that the activity itself is useless. Absolutely not. However, the majority of UX personas we’ve seen are of no help whatsoever. Why is that? Mostly because people tend to write down stuff that is irrelevant to product management or UX design. What makes a good persona then? – Great question. Let us explain.

What are UX Personas?

On the off chance, that you need your memory jogged on what UX personas are, here’s a quick reminder.

User personas are a fictional representation of real data that represents the commonalities among certain groups of users. Generally, the tangible version of a UX persona is a 1 to 3-page document that outlines patterns, skills, goals, and other traits of a certain user group.

Did you notice how we formatted “real” as bold in the previous paragraph? That was certainly intentional. One of the fundamental mistakes we see time and again is creating a persona-based purely on assumptions. Personas should reflect actual data. More on that later.

Image4

Start with what: UX Persona cargo cult

Here’s why you would bother with creating a user persona:

  • Empathetic design. With the help of UX personas, you can document user research findings and enable the people involved in product development to practice empathy through product decisions. 
  • Decision making. Guiding your product decisions depending on your users’ traits.
  • Documenting research findings. A user persona document should be the hub that’s frequently consulted and updated. That’s one of the places you go to when in doubt.

As the famous quote goes, people ignore products that ignore people. The UX personas, as an essential tool to empathize and study users, is exactly what helps you to do the opposite of ignoring people.

Let’s circle back to the mistakes we see people do. What we see happen often, is a bit of a product management cargo cult. Everybody does personas and most, if not all, product people agree they are useful. Then let’s create a UX persona as well! Such a thought process might lead to positive outcomes, of course. However, this line of thinking jumps to “what” without considering “the why”. Informing your user research with goals, such as those that we outlined above, will help you create a valuable product artifact, rather than merely checking a box in your to-do list. Not seeing the goal at the end of the road results in generic unactionable personas that gather dust on your Google Drive.

Image4

Assumptions-based approaches

Well, let’s say you’re building an app for social media management. You would probably then think that marketers and influencers would be good places to start with creating personas. That sounds alright. 

What doesn’t sound alright, however, is then assuming the motivations, goals, and other traits. Educated guesses are fine, of course, but you are not your user. Shallow research, or lack of thereof, leads to shallow understanding, and lukewarm, mediocre products as a result. 

That said, you should make sure that the personas reflect actual people. How do you do that? – Research. Generally, you would do the bulk of research in the earlier stages of the product design process. The findings will be used for a number of things: feature prioritization, customer journey maps, studying competitors, creating UX personas, etc. The latter is useful since it crystalizes your knowledge of who you’re creating the product for.

In more concrete terms, your research activities may include:

  • Qualitative methods (great for products pending launch);
  • User interviews;
  • Usability testing;
  • Card sorting;
  • Quantitative research (generally used for launched products);
  • Surveys;
  • A/b testings;
  • Usage data such as conversions, user retention, adoption rates, etc.

This list is by no means exhaustive, but we find ourselves using these methods most often.

Getting it perfect on the first attempt

As mentioned earlier, UX personas should be updated regularly. The first draft will be messy. That’s the point of iterative approaches. You build new findings on top of the old ones. However, more often than not, we see people create superfluous personas just once and think they’re done. We’ve seen people include hobbies, siblings, education details, and other information that’s quite frankly useless. 

Image4

Don’t get us wrong, for some products information like background and education might inform decisions on, say, UX copywriting. Nonetheless, in our experience, you need to dig deeper into the real motivations, goals, and habits. These are the things that deliver real value.

Creating a useful persona

Now that we’ve gone through some common mistakes people do, let’s explore the path to a useful UX persona. Personally, we use a similar approach regardless of whether the product is launched or not. Here’s a brief outline of what we do.

  1. First, we conduct a workshop with stakeholders (sales, marketing, product management, etc.) to talk about different user types. It’s important to get up to speed with the current user intelligence. You don’t always need to start from scratch;
  2. It’s important to invite a wide range of experts and team members to gather better insights;
  3. It’s also crucial to share all the data and prior research (if available) regarding the personas, so it can support the ideation with helpful data;
  4. During the said workshop, we would write down information on different user types and seek patterns and commonalities.
  5. We try to share the ownership of different user types so everyone can contribute their thoughts;
  6. If there are only a few patterns emerging, or your personas feel generic, you’re likely not going deep enough. Think of what information will be useful and where to get it;
  7. This step is crucial: try to dissect the main differences in terms of behavior, needs, pain points, and the information users are looking for. In doing so, you’ll avoid talking about persona’s food preferences when working on a banking app;
  8. Create baselines for your personas – this should summarize all the work done until now and furthermore achieve alignment across the team and with stakeholders.
  9. Validate and enhance those baselines with doing research and interviews;
  10. Document the results. You can either go with a fancy design or a simple spreadsheet. Both options serve their purpose just fine.
  11. Don’t forget to present the findings and final personas to the whole team, to avoid any misunderstandings (in case of changes) but also to highlight the value of research to skeptical stakeholders (that’s why we don’t use the baselines as the final personas).

Outro

The last thing this article should do is discourage you from creating a UX persona. Trust us, it’s totally worth the effort. Keeping in mind some of the mistakes you’ve mentioned, should lead you a long way to creating useful product management & UX Design artifact.

post authorAdam Fard

Adam Fard
Adam is a senior lead UX/UI designer with more than 8 years of experience. Adam's passion for design steadily grew into his own agency, that he's currently leading.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • UX personas are meaningful for product management and UX design only if they are based on real data and not on assumptions.
  • Leveraging UX personas is key to empathizing with users, making informed decisions, and designing valuable products.
  • A common mistake is overlooking the research stage or not putting enough effort and time into refining UX personas.
  • It is vital to get as deep as possible and collect relevant information by communicating with stakeholders, conducting prior research and interviews, identifying differences between users, and creating baselines.

Related Articles

Consistency in UI/UX builds trust and efficiency — without it, users feel lost. Learn how top brands maintain it and how AI can help.

Article by Rodolpho Henrique
Consistency in UI/UX Design: The Key to User Satisfaction
  • The article examines the role of consistency in UI/UX design for user trust and efficiency.
  • It showcases visual, functional, and interaction consistency in creating seamless experiences.
  • The piece warns about the negative effects of inconsistency, including confusion and frustration.
  • It promotes the use of AI and design systems to ensure consistency across digital platforms.
Share:Consistency in UI/UX Design: The Key to User Satisfaction
4 min read

If Mobile-First thinking has revolutionized the UX Design industry, AI-First is promising to be an even more spectacular kick in the pants.

Article by Greg Nudelman
The Rise of AI-First Products
  • The article explores how AI-powered operating systems are changing user interactions.
  • It covers AI-driven personalization, automation, and adaptive interfaces.
  • The piece discusses challenges like privacy, over-reliance on AI, and user control.
  • It highlights opportunities to design more intuitive and human-centered AI experiences.
Share:The Rise of AI-First Products
11 min read

AI is reshaping UX, and Figma may be sinking. As AI-driven systems minimize UI, traditional design roles must evolve — or risk becoming obsolete. Are you ready to adapt?

Article by Greg Nudelman
AI Is Flipping UX Upside Down: How to Keep Your UX Job, and Why Figma is a Titanic (It’s not for the Reasons You Think)
  • The article explores the fundamental shift in UX as AI-first systems minimize the role of UI, rendering traditional design tools like Figma increasingly obsolete.
  • It introduces the “Iceberg UX Model,” illustrating how modern AI-driven interfaces prioritize functionality and automation over visual design.
  • The piece argues that UX professionals must shift their focus from UI aesthetics to AI-driven user experience, emphasizing use case validation, AI model integration, and data-informed decision-making.
  • It warns that designers who remain fixated on pixel-perfect layouts risk becoming obsolete, urging them to adapt by engaging in AI-driven UX strategies.
Share:AI Is Flipping UX Upside Down: How to Keep Your UX Job, and Why Figma is a Titanic (It’s not for the Reasons You Think)
7 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and