Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Scaled AI Requires Canonical Truth

Scaled AI Requires Canonical Truth

by Josh Tyson
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Before enterprises can deploy AI agents that actually work, they need something most organizations don’t have: a single, authoritative source of truth. Joe DosSantos, VP of Enterprise Data and Analytics at Workday, joins Robb and Josh for a wide-ranging conversation about canonical knowledge, the semantic layer, and why data governance, a concept from the 1990s, has suddenly become essential for AI deployment.

The core challenge? Large language models are predictive engines that “anticipate what you probably would mean,” as DosSantos explains. They’re “pretty good at words, but they suck at math.” For B2C applications where multiple interpretations are acceptable, this works fine. But in enterprise contexts, where revenue was exactly $1.625651 billion last year, organizations need deterministic truth, not probabilistic guesses.

The solution requires three layers: establishing canonical knowledge (the laborious human work of defining what data means in your organization), building a semantic layer (the translation mechanism between human definitions and machine-readable formats like YAML), and using the LLM as an interface to deterministic back-end systems rather than treating AI as the system itself.

DosSantos offers a compelling metaphor: trying to deploy AI agents without this foundation is like wanting granite countertops without building the foundation of the house first. You can’t skip it, it’s non-negotiable infrastructure. 

The conversation also tackles AI anxiety, with DosSantos referencing Kate Darling’s framework of thinking about AI as animals rather than human replacements, and Robb Wilson proposing we view AI as simply “smarter machines” — skill saws that know the difference between wood and fingers, stoves that prevent fires, and washing machines that don’t shrink clothes.

For leaders evaluating AI investments, this episode clarifies what actually needs to be built before agents can deliver value: not flashy use cases, but the unglamorous, essential work of data governance and semantic translation.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Another lesson from studying UX with Laura Klein.

Article by Paivi Salminen
The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
  • Agile teams are fast, but designers get stuck in an infinite loop of visual work: redesigning the same components over and over instead of solving real UX problems.
  • Design systems break that cycle, defining the building blocks once, freeing designers to focus on how the product works, not how it looks.
  • When the basics are in place, teams can start working together sooner, prototype faster, and release incremental features without the interface falling apart.
Share:The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
4 min read

AI can create wireframes, synthesize research, and draft copy fast. What it can’t do: understand your users, carry context, or be accountable when something goes wrong. That’s still you.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
AI Is Your New Intern, Not Your Replacement
  • AI is not replacing UX pros; it’s automating repetitive tasks and augmenting human capabilities.
  • Think of AI as an intern: quick, smart, but dependent on human direction, context, and judgment.
  • Human skills like empathy, research, systems thinking, and ethical decision-making are more important than ever.
  • The future belongs to designers who incorporate AI to accelerate execution and devote more time to strategic, human-centered work.
Share:AI Is Your New Intern, Not Your Replacement
20 min read

How the most intentional designers are working with AI — and why “vibe coding” really needs a better name.

Article by Jim Gulsen
Beyond Vibe Coding: A Designer’s Case for Directed Generation
  • The term “vibe coding” initially described an unstructured approach with minimal accountability, which doesn’t apply to professional design. It risks oversimplifying AI-assisted processes, ignoring the intentionality and expertise involved in high-level design. 
  • In practice, designers engage in “directed generation,” setting clear constraints, selecting references, and refining details. The AI model follows the designer’s guidance rather than taking initiative.
Share:Beyond Vibe Coding: A Designer’s Case for Directed Generation
7 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and