Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Innovation ›› Rethink Space: Designing a Human-Centered Workspace that Supports Flexibility, Collaboration, Privacy, Innovation, Creativity, and Transparency

Rethink Space: Designing a Human-Centered Workspace that Supports Flexibility, Collaboration, Privacy, Innovation, Creativity, and Transparency

by Aalap Doshi
7 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Designing workspaces is not just about aesthetics; it’s about creating an environment that fosters collaboration, creativity, and privacy. Rethink Space challenges the traditional office layout by reimagining MICHR‘s 21,940 square feet into a flexible, human-centered space. Through immersive research and co-creation, the project blends open collaboration areas with quiet zones, improving productivity and communication. The result? An award-winning design that meets both functional needs and organizational culture, proving that effective workspaces are shaped by people, not just trends.

Project overview

Space matters. We read space like we read people’s faces. Space is the foundation for the expression of our cultural values. Space is an instrument of collaboration and innovation. At MICHR, we realized that our workspace played a big role in how we functioned. As a result, the Rethink Space team was created as a grounds-up initiative to creatively and economically enhance our operating space into a flexible workspace that supports privacy, innovation, creativity, and most importantly a culture of collaboration.

My role

The team is made up of five extremely passionate and dedicated MICHR employees, including myself, who are all interested in enhancing the space around us in a human-centered way. I was the team lead.

Impact

The Rethink Space team has received positive anecdotal feedback from MICHR staff and guests suggesting that the new space is “more functional,” “matches their style of work,” “is more collaborative,” “is less intrusive,” “has more natural light,” and “is friendlier.” The team has won an Ergo Hero award from the University of Michigan for our creative efforts in building a multiple-purpose open space, thus improving communication and collaboration among staff.

  • 90 employees positively impacted
  • 21,940 square feet of space re-imagined
  • $34,000 project cost

Process

Rethinking our space was a complex problem with a fuzzy goal. While we as an organization had a vague, nebulous idea of what we wanted our space to embody and stand for, there were too many unknowns to have any specifics. Our project involved creating a human-centered, participatory platform to support exploration and experimentation.

1. Hear: assessment of staff and organizational needs

This phase was all about generating empathy. We wanted to understand people and their lives at MICHR. We wanted to see them at work, hear what they hear, feel what they feel, and know what they think. Below is how we went about it. We did this through the following:

  • Idea board
  • In-context immersions
  • Co-create workshops
  • Surveys & polls
To gain empathy and understand the people we were designing for on an intellectual, emotional, and experiential level, we immersed ourselves in their cubes, offices, meeting places, hallways, storage places, etc.
A network map being built at a Co-create workshop. The network map helped us understand how our space was being traversed
To understand the aspirations of the MICHR staff in relation to their workspace, we asked them to imagine that the space was already built and was so successful that Time Magazine was doing a cover story on it. We then asked them to imagine for us what the header, sections, images, and callouts of the cover story would be
As a way of achieving convergence on various ideas, in each of the workshops we broke into smaller working groups to think through and prototype corresponding solutions

2. Understand: analyze findings

This phase involved surfacing themes from all the user research we had been through. It also involved spotting opportunities and converting them into stories to be shared. Here is how we did it and what we found.

Our project room

In order to externalize our knowledge and use it in our discussions, we turned one of the empty offices into a team room. We used the room to uncover and share insights gained from the “Hear” phase, identify opportunities, synthesize themes, and hold meetings. The team room contained affinity notes created from our interviews, grouped by categories, and marked with insights. It also contained the various artifacts that were generated from the “Hear” phase constantly reminding us of all that we had learned and making sure that we were always thinking about it. We also opened the team room to all MICHR staff, promoting transparency and co-ownership in the process.

The affinity diagramming exercise and insights generated from the other artifacts led us to see the emergence of the following high-level themes for staff and organizational needs the following:

  • Lack of spatial colocation within teams
  • Need for flexible workspaces
  • Need for appropriate signage and wayfinding
  • Noise level
  • Space ownership
We used an affinity diagram and layered it on images of various spaces to capture and thematize insights from our user research
A model depicting the organizational structure of MICHR. We used this model to help the MICHR’s physical space reflect its organizational structure

3. Create: propose solutions and get feedback

This phase involved using the insights gathered from the previous two phases to dream of an alternative future, share that future, and gather feedback. Some highlights of the design are listed below:

3.1 Guiding principles

One of the first things the Rethink Space team did in this phase was to create a series of guiding principles based on our design research that could guide us in redesigning our space. Here are the principles:

  • Enhance, not replace
  • Make space for change
  • Leave room to evolve
  • Design for social collisions
  • People, not technology
  • Bold is better than bland
  • Small changes can have a profound impact

3.2 Zones

Zoning is a device of land-use planning used by urban planners around the world to designate permitted uses of land based on mapped zones. MICHR’s zones were created to use as a guide for space planning. They include an open zone, a collaboration zone, a quiet zone, and a zone for central services.

3.3 Colocation

As discussed in the “Understand” phase above, MICHR’s staff was spread out in an unsystematic manner. As can be seen from the maps in the figure above where each color represents a different MICHR program, the proposal aimed at getting teams spatially together to boost productivity, communication, and morale.

3.4 Cube configuration

Through our Hear phase, we realized that a pod-like cube configuration worked best for programs at MICHR. It allowed people to turn around and communicate with their team members, made impromptu conversations possible, and helped to uncover and solve problems faster. In our old space, only about half of our cubes were set up as pods.

3.5 Dedicated team spaces

Our design research helped us see that there are teams across MICHR that need dedicated spaces to come together to perform specific tasks such as assembling packets, brainstorming, and project management. The proposed design included assigning offices to teams that needed them to be used as team rooms.

3.6 Open area and quiet space

The proposed open area was a flexible space in the open zone where staff could have lunch with their friends, grab their peers and collaborate, stand and work, organize and participate in events, or simply enjoy beautiful views of the courtyard. The open area would be created by consolidating the open, unused cubes, and making the area by the courtyard available to all. Technology and prototyping materials would be introduced in the space to provide for random collaborations and a bias toward action.

To balance the open active spaces around MICHR, the proposed design also contained a shared quiet space in the quiet zone. The quiet space would be available for anyone to walk into when they need quiet focused time to work or reflect.

3.7 Wayfinding

The proposed design allowed us to come up with multiple wayfinding mechanisms to help MICHR employees and visitors find people and resources at MICHR. These included branding signs identifying programs in their space, directional signs directing people to various programs and services, and utility-related signs like “Kitchen” and “Supplies.”

Impact

Area by the courtyard after the Rethink Space project. The space is used by MICHR’s staff for ad-hoc meetings, team get-togethers, all-staff meetings, celebrations, and relaxation. Along with moveable tables, whiteboards, and displays, there is also a lunch area complete with a microwave and cutlery. The open area has become a hub for collaboration and innovation at MICHR
Some teams at MICHR now have dedicated spaces that they can use for specific tasks such as assembling packets, brainstorming, and project management. A separate open workspace was carved out for the software development team to suit their agile work process needs
Signs are placed on all the pillars to make it easier for people to find the specific programs they are looking for within MICHR. We made the signs in-house using vinyl especially since our program names change often and it would be expensive to have to custom print the signs every time

In the short time following the opening of the new space, the Rethink Space team has received positive anecdotal feedback from MICHR staff and guests suggesting that the new space is “more functional,” “matches their style of work,” “is more collaborative,” “is less intrusive,” “has more natural light,” and “is friendlier.” The project was nominated for a Medical School Administration team award by the staff. The team also won an Ergo Hero award from the University of Michigan for our creative efforts in building a multiple-purpose open space, thus improving communication and collaboration among staff. In terms of usage, we have observed that the open space is almost always occupied, either by a single large group or by multiple smaller teams. Attendance seems to have increased at MICHR events like the monthly all-staff meetings, lunchtime enrichment presentations, and celebrations, which are now all held in the open space. The quiet area is also occupied often and the dedicated team rooms are in use.

This creates a more inviting and welcoming atmosphere where people can come together to visit, collaborate and create synergy. — MICHR employee

It has really helped with team dynamics. — MICHR employee

Lessons learned

  • Momentum is key
  • Build with them, not for them
  • You have to get creative to understand what people really want
  • Over-communicate
  • Be nice (and genuine)
  • Be flexible
  • Stay at it
  • Baby steps
  • Have fun

The article originally appeared on aalapdoshi.com.

Featured image courtesy: Curated Lifestyle.

post authorAalap Doshi

Aalap Doshi
Aalap is a versatile UX leader, product strategist, and engineer with over 20 years of experience in transforming complex challenges into innovative solutions. As Head of Product & User Experience at ICPSR, he helps reimagine digital offerings for the world's leading social science data archive. His career includes impactful work at Michigan Medicine, where he built human-centered design programs, and co-founding Findcare acquired by NeedyMeds, a nonprofit that connects low-income communities with affordable healthcare. A recognized expert in design thinking, Aalap also teaches at the University of Michigan, sharing his expertise on navigating ambiguity in UX.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The article explores how human-centered workspace design can improve collaboration, flexibility, and creativity by addressing employee needs.
  • It highlights solutions like open zones, quiet spaces, and pod-like configurations, showing how these changes boosted teamwork and morale.
  • The piece emphasizes the value of co-creation, adaptability, and clear communication in rethinking office spaces.

Related Articles

In an industry where clarity is key, why can’t we agree on the language to define what we do? Dive into the evolution of UX, UI, and Product Design — from pioneering generalists of the early web to today’s specialized roles — and discover how our industry’s struggle with terminology may be holding us back.

Article by Andy Budd
The Historical Context of UX, UI, and Product Design
  • This article delves into the historical evolution of UX, UI, and Product Design, tracing their journey from the early days of web design to modern hybrid roles.
  • It examines how the industry’s struggle with clear terminology has impacted its growth, potentially ceding authority to other professions like project management.
Share:The Historical Context of UX, UI, and Product Design
5 min read

The article discusses how we use maturity models in design and argues that “immaturity” frequently reflects smart strategic choices. Instead of trying to reach ideal standards, we should focus on how design aligns with business objectives.

Article by Andy Budd
Just Grow Up: Why Design Maturity Models Might Be Harming Our Industry!
  • The article questions how mature a design is. It states It states that some strategic decisions are called immature.
  • The piece uses budget airlines and luxury carriers as examples. These examples demonstrate that design decisions are based on business strategies, rather than universal standards.
  • The article says we should judge design based on how well it matches business goals, not by strict rules.
Share:Just Grow Up: Why Design Maturity Models Might Be Harming Our Industry!
3 min read

Discover how AI is changing UX research. It’s not just making data analysis faster. It’s also encouraging people to think more deeply. Learn how to strike a balance between human insight and AI-driven efficiency to create more thoughtful designs.

Article by Charles Gedeon
How AI and Metacognition Are Shaping UX Research
  • The article talks about how AI can speed up data analysis and encourage people to think more deeply about biases and missed insights, which can improve the quality of user-centered design.
  • It shows that AI-powered UX research tools need to include reflection checkpoints. These checkpoints let researchers critically assess their assumptions and conclusions.
  • The piece highlights the collaboration between AI’s ability to recognize patterns and human judgment to make sure the research outcomes are meaningful and consider the context.
Share:How AI and Metacognition Are Shaping UX Research
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and