Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Become a member
Home ›› LLM? More Like “Limited” Language Model with Emily M. Bender, University of Washington

LLM? More Like “Limited” Language Model with Emily M. Bender, University of Washington

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

On this episode of the Invisible Machines podcast, Robb and Josh welcome Emily M. Bender, a Linguistics Professor at the University of Washington and co-author of the Stochastic Parrots paper from 2021 that prompted Sam Altman to tweet “i am a stochastic parrot, and so r u.” According to Bender, Altman totally missed the point.

Having worked in computational linguistics for more than 20 years, she’s a staunch critic of LLMs like OpenAI’s GPT models. Emily is also co-host of the Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000 podcast, and she joins Robb and Josh for a provocative conversation about the limitations and dangers associated with large language models.

Check out the episode here.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson, Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

How AI Can Help Us Solve the Climate Crisis

  • Artificial Intelligence, Defining AI, Generative AI, New and Emerging Technologies
Article by Savannah Kunovsky
IDEAS IN BRIEF
How AI Can Help Us Solve the Climate Crisis
  • The article delves into the transformative intersection of generative AI and the Climate Era, highlighting their potential to reshape economies, influence consumer behaviors, and address sustainability challenges.
Read Article →
Share
Share:How AI Can Help Us Solve the Climate Crisis
5 min read

​6 Ways to Improve Psychological AI Apps and Chatbots

  • Artificial Intelligence, Generative AI, Psychology and Human Behavior

Repetitiveness, complicated setups, and lack of personalization deter users.

Article by Marlynn Wei
IDEAS IN BRIEF
​6 Ways to Improve Psychological AI Apps and Chatbots
  • Personalized feedback, high-quality dynamic conversations, and a streamlined setup improve user engagement.
  • People dislike an overly scripted and repetitive AI chatbot that bottlenecks access to other features.
  • Tracking is a feature that engages users and develops an “observer mind,” enhancing awareness and change.
  • New research shows that users are less engaged in AI apps and chatbots that are repetitive, lack personalized advice, and have long or glitchy setup processes.
Read Article →
Share
Share:​6 Ways to Improve Psychological AI Apps and Chatbots
3 min read
✕

Did you know UX Magazine hosts the most popular podcast about conversational AI?

Listen to Invisible Machines

Join 740,000 designers, thinkers, and doers.

Become a member

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and

Accept policy