Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› An Argument Against User Personas in UX Design

An Argument Against User Personas in UX Design

by Phylicia Flynn
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

AnArgument1400x765

User Personas are detrimental to inclusivity. Understanding the your demographic of your product is important, it’s also important to not over generalize. Over generalization will result in designs not friendly to all users. Can we really be user advocates while only focusing on the generalized user?

Can we really be user advocates while only focusing on the generalized user?

Have you ever listened to a new perspective and it resonated with you for weeks after?

Three weeks ago I attended a webinar called “Designing Experiences for Underserved and Gentrified Communities” with Cora Cowles, Experience Design Director at Huge. Cora gave an amazing, well-researched lecture explaining how we as designers are leaving out so many users. And since then, I have not been able to stop thinking about it. I will not recap what she said because I will in no way do it justice (watch it here), but it made me think…

As UX Designers, aren’t we supposed to be user advocates? And how can we say we are user advocates if we aren’t actually being inclusive?

Cora starts her talk referencing the 80/20 rule, also known as the Pareto principle. If you aren’t familiar with this, it means that 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes.

As designers, this means with 20% of our effort, we can cover the needs of 80% of users. All sounds great but then Cora Cowles says:

“The problem is, by going with the 80/20 rule, it becomes a generalization and that means you are always leaving someone out”

I don’t know about you but the “always leaving someone out” part doesn’t sit right with me.

In order to properly design for the 20%, you have to first understand accessibility and inclusivity. There are endless resources for understanding different user needs but one I have been referencing is the Microsoft’s inclusive design toolkit. Microsoft defines inclusive design as:

A methodology, born out of digital environments, that enables and draws on the full range of human diversity. Most importantly, this means including and learning from people with a range of perspectives.

While Microsoft breaks down constraints into permanent, temporary and situational, Cora took it a step further and expanded it:

  • The impaired: Permanently, temporarily or situationally. Those with physical, mental and learning disorders.
  • The resource deficient: No home, transportation, internet or smartphone. Living at or below the poverty line.
  • The cast aside: Those with a race, religion, language group or social status different from that of the majority.

For those who are new to UX or just happen to find yourself reading this article, I should explain what a user persona is.

Personas are created early on in the design process to help designers and stakeholders empathize with their users. They are essentially fictional characters that represent synthesized data collected from user research. They summarize the common goals and pain points users expressed during the research phase. Since this acts as a summary of their users, if an issue is brought up by only one user, it typically gets discarded since it is not a common theme among the whole group of users.

AnArgumentAgainstUserPersonas

Sample of a persona created for a project with Flatiron School

But see how that can be an issue with inclusivity? If one user mentions they are color blind, you won’t include that in your persona since none of the other users you interviewed have any constraints. So your persona becomes this “ideal” version of your user.

While yes, understanding the your demographic of your product is important, it’s also important to not over generalize. Over generalization will result in designs not friendly to all users.

Educating yourself on the different constraints people can experience and designing with those constraints in mind first, it will be easier to incorporate the needs of the 80% after facing the needs of the 20%.

Don’t only be a user advocate — be an advocate for accessibility, diversity and inclusivity.

Keep creating user personas to represent your demographic but add a quality that will be a reminder to you, as the designer, to be more inclusive in your research, designs and testing.

“Removing the blinders uncovers a new level of empathy and understanding for users.” — Cora Cowles

AnArgumentAgainstUserPersonas
post authorPhylicia Flynn

Phylicia Flynn

I’m a hardworking yet light-hearted UX Designer trying to positively impact people’s lives through creative problem solving. I strongly believe in the power of design thinking to create not only functional solutions, but inspiring solutions as well.

Coming from the architecture world, human-centered design is my jam. I worked as an Interior Designer in world-renowned architecture firms for the first 5 years of my professional career. With my main focus on workplace transformation, I learned the importance of understanding your user group to properly design the physical space. Many ideologies can cross over from designing physical space to designing digital space.

When not googly eyed from a great interface or a beautiful old building, you can find me at a coffee shop with a good read trying to pet every dog I see.
 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI is reshaping UX, and Figma may be sinking. As AI-driven systems minimize UI, traditional design roles must evolve — or risk becoming obsolete. Are you ready to adapt?

Article by Greg Nudelman
AI Is Flipping UX Upside Down: How to Keep Your UX Job, and Why Figma is a Titanic (It’s not for the Reasons You Think)
  • The article explores the fundamental shift in UX as AI-first systems minimize the role of UI, rendering traditional design tools like Figma increasingly obsolete.
  • It introduces the “Iceberg UX Model,” illustrating how modern AI-driven interfaces prioritize functionality and automation over visual design.
  • The piece argues that UX professionals must shift their focus from UI aesthetics to AI-driven user experience, emphasizing use case validation, AI model integration, and data-informed decision-making.
  • It warns that designers who remain fixated on pixel-perfect layouts risk becoming obsolete, urging them to adapt by engaging in AI-driven UX strategies.
Share:AI Is Flipping UX Upside Down: How to Keep Your UX Job, and Why Figma is a Titanic (It’s not for the Reasons You Think)
7 min read

Data visualization isn’t just about charts — it’s about telling a clear and compelling story. This article unpacks a wide spectrum of essential principles for making data easy to understand, honest, and engaging. Ready to transform complex numbers into meaningful insights?

Article by Jim Gulsen
The Ultimate Data Visualization Handbook for Designers
  • The article serves as a comprehensive guide for elevating visualization work, combining technical expertise with design principles to help designers transform raw data into meaningful insights.
  • It provides a point of reference for strategies, methods, and best practices to create more effective and impactful data visualizations.
  • The piece recommends tools and resources that design professionals can immediately implement to enhance the clarity and persuasiveness of their data storytelling.
Share:The Ultimate Data Visualization Handbook for Designers
23 min read

Discover how breaking down silos and embracing cross-functional collaboration can lead to smarter, more user-centered design — and better products for everyone.

Article by Rodolpho Henrique
Beyond the Design Silo: How Collaboration Elevates UX
  • The article explores how siloed UX design practices can hinder product success and argues for cross-functional collaboration as essential to creating meaningful user experiences.
  • It outlines the benefits of working closely with product managers, engineers, and stakeholders to align user needs with technical feasibility and business goals.
  • The piece provides real-world collaboration examples across research, prototyping, design systems, and accessibility to show how teamwork leads to more innovative and effective UX outcomes.
Share:Beyond the Design Silo: How Collaboration Elevates UX
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and