Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Analytics and Tracking ›› A Simple Method to Analyze Task Flow

A Simple Method to Analyze Task Flow

by Khatia Gagnidze
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

This is a simple method to prove to ourselves and the stakeholders that the task flow we just created is worth being implemented.

As designers, we often have to prove to ourselves and the stakeholders that the task flow we just created is worthy of implementation. It’s difficult to find convincing arguments to make them believe that the upgraded flow will be successful (RIP Great ideas).

What is one of the best ways to show the efficiency of a product or functionality? Numbers! To be more specific — ideas validated with data. I found a simple method for such scenarios and share it with you in this article. 

Take a look at the example of the onboarding flow:

 Analyze Task Flow

Onboarding flow

As soon as we have a flow, all the actions that a user will have to take should be written down (Note that these actions can vary depending on the type of flow; there might be gestures, fingerprints, and screens that disappear within a few seconds). In this example, there are four actions provided:

  1. Tap
  2. Type
  3. Open external link
  4. Scroll

Next, we need to evaluate them according to their importance (mental workload), time, and effort spent. For example, Scroll seems to be the easiest task as a user doesn’t have to make a crucial decision — they merely look through the content fast while scrolling. Therefore I assigned it 1 point. It is a very subjective part of the process, so feel free to experiment while evaluating. In my case Tap is 3 points, Type is 5 points, and External link is 10 points (this is the highest because users have to leave the app, which can be dangerous).

Assess the screens

Place signs to identify each action near the corresponding screens:

 Analyze Task Flow

12 Taps / 4 Types / 1 External link / 1 Scroll

Simplify the flow

Now it is time to simplify the flow and count the actions again. I decided to turn the first four screens into one, placed all types of inputs together, and eliminated the number of password input fields. Here is the simplified version of the flow:

 Analyze Task Flow

6 Taps / 3 Types / 1 External link / 1 Scroll

Calculate

As soon as we evaluate initial and updated flows, it is time to open excel and create two pages: one for the initial version and the other for the updated version. Enter simple formulas in the third column (e.x. =B1*3 — in case of taps — the number of taps multiplied by its value).

 Analyze Task Flow

Tap counts =B1*3

As soon as there are formulas entered in the C column, fill in the B column with digits. The total score will appear in the 5th row & C column (enter =SUM(C1:C4 in it to view the result).

 Analyze Task Flow

Working in Excel is optional, you can calculate everything using just pen and paper

Now you can see the results: the updated flow is 37% ((67–42)/67×100=37) simpler than the original one!

When is the method useful?

This method is useful while redesigning a website or an app, and while simplifying the most frequently used flows. Most importantly, as I mentioned above, all the data gathered can enforce your arguments during the negotiations with stakeholders.

post authorKhatia Gagnidze

Khatia Gagnidze
Khatia is a designer with over 6 years of experience in product design, specializing in fintech, eCommerce, blockchain, banking, social network, and other industries. She has successfully designed, UX audited, and conducted research both remotely and on-site for companies worldwide, including in Australia, Singapore, UAE, France, and the USA.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI can create wireframes, synthesize research, and draft copy fast. What it can’t do: understand your users, carry context, or be accountable when something goes wrong. That’s still you.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
AI Is Your New Intern, Not Your Replacement
  • AI is not replacing UX pros; it’s automating repetitive tasks and augmenting human capabilities.
  • Think of AI as an intern: quick, smart, but dependent on human direction, context, and judgment.
  • Human skills like empathy, research, systems thinking, and ethical decision-making are more important than ever.
  • The future belongs to designers who incorporate AI to accelerate execution and devote more time to strategic, human-centered work.
Share:AI Is Your New Intern, Not Your Replacement
20 min read

Another lesson from studying UX with Laura Klein.

Article by Paivi Salminen
The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
  • Agile teams are fast, but designers get stuck in an infinite loop of visual work: redesigning the same components over and over instead of solving real UX problems.
  • Design systems break that cycle, defining the building blocks once, freeing designers to focus on how the product works, not how it looks.
  • When the basics are in place, teams can start working together sooner, prototype faster, and release incremental features without the interface falling apart.
Share:The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
4 min read

Real engagement is about designing experiences that people want to have. Here are some things that games do well that most apps don’t.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
  • Most apps use gamification as a manipulation layer to drive metrics, but people engage with things that are truly worthy of their time, not points or streak guilt.
  • Apps that people stick with do this by designing for intrinsic motivation, making the experience itself rewarding.
  • The true measure of success is whether users feel more capable, accomplished, and enriched for having used your app.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
8 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and