Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Analytics and Tracking ›› A Simple Method to Analyze Task Flow

A Simple Method to Analyze Task Flow

by Khatia Gagnidze
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

This is a simple method to prove to ourselves and the stakeholders that the task flow we just created is worth being implemented.

As designers, we often have to prove to ourselves and the stakeholders that the task flow we just created is worthy of implementation. It’s difficult to find convincing arguments to make them believe that the upgraded flow will be successful (RIP Great ideas).

What is one of the best ways to show the efficiency of a product or functionality? Numbers! To be more specific — ideas validated with data. I found a simple method for such scenarios and share it with you in this article. 

Take a look at the example of the onboarding flow:

 Analyze Task Flow

Onboarding flow

As soon as we have a flow, all the actions that a user will have to take should be written down (Note that these actions can vary depending on the type of flow; there might be gestures, fingerprints, and screens that disappear within a few seconds). In this example, there are four actions provided:

  1. Tap
  2. Type
  3. Open external link
  4. Scroll

Next, we need to evaluate them according to their importance (mental workload), time, and effort spent. For example, Scroll seems to be the easiest task as a user doesn’t have to make a crucial decision — they merely look through the content fast while scrolling. Therefore I assigned it 1 point. It is a very subjective part of the process, so feel free to experiment while evaluating. In my case Tap is 3 points, Type is 5 points, and External link is 10 points (this is the highest because users have to leave the app, which can be dangerous).

Assess the screens

Place signs to identify each action near the corresponding screens:

 Analyze Task Flow

12 Taps / 4 Types / 1 External link / 1 Scroll

Simplify the flow

Now it is time to simplify the flow and count the actions again. I decided to turn the first four screens into one, placed all types of inputs together, and eliminated the number of password input fields. Here is the simplified version of the flow:

 Analyze Task Flow

6 Taps / 3 Types / 1 External link / 1 Scroll

Calculate

As soon as we evaluate initial and updated flows, it is time to open excel and create two pages: one for the initial version and the other for the updated version. Enter simple formulas in the third column (e.x. =B1*3 — in case of taps — the number of taps multiplied by its value).

 Analyze Task Flow

Tap counts =B1*3

As soon as there are formulas entered in the C column, fill in the B column with digits. The total score will appear in the 5th row & C column (enter =SUM(C1:C4 in it to view the result).

 Analyze Task Flow

Working in Excel is optional, you can calculate everything using just pen and paper

Now you can see the results: the updated flow is 37% ((67–42)/67×100=37) simpler than the original one!

When is the method useful?

This method is useful while redesigning a website or an app, and while simplifying the most frequently used flows. Most importantly, as I mentioned above, all the data gathered can enforce your arguments during the negotiations with stakeholders.

post authorKhatia Gagnidze

Khatia Gagnidze
Khatia is a designer with over 6 years of experience in product design, specializing in fintech, eCommerce, blockchain, banking, social network, and other industries. She has successfully designed, UX audited, and conducted research both remotely and on-site for companies worldwide, including in Australia, Singapore, UAE, France, and the USA.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

What if your productivity app could keep you as focused as your favorite game? This article explores how game design psychology can transform everyday tools into experiences that spark flow, focus, and real engagement.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Flow State Design: Applying Game Psychology to Productivity Apps
  • The article shows how principles from game design can help productivity tools create and sustain a flow state.
  • It explains that games succeed by balancing challenge and skill, providing clear goals, and offering immediate feedback — elements most productivity apps lack.
  • The piece argues that applying these psychological insights could make work tools more engaging, adaptive, and motivating.
Share:Flow State Design: Applying Game Psychology to Productivity Apps
12 min read

Learn how understanding user emotions can create intuitive, supportive designs that build trust and loyalty.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
The Role of Emotion in UX: Embracing Emotionally Intelligent Design
  • The article emphasizes that emotionally intelligent design is key to creating meaningful UX that satisfies users and drives business success.
  • It shows how understanding users’ emotions — through research, empathy mapping, journey mapping, and service blueprinting — can reveal hidden needs and shape more intuitive, reassuring digital experiences.
  • The piece argues that embedding empathy and emotional insights into design strengthens user engagement, loyalty, and overall satisfaction.
Share:The Role of Emotion in UX: Embracing Emotionally Intelligent Design
5 min read

As AI takes on more of the solution work, the real craft of design shifts to how we frame the problem. This piece explores why staying with uncertainty and resisting the urge to rush to answers may be a designer’s most powerful skill.

Article by Morteza Pourmohamadi
The Frame, the Illusion, and the Brief
  • The article highlights that as AI takes over more of the solution work, the designer’s true craft lies in framing the problem rather than rushing to solve it.
  • It shows how cognitive biases like the need for closure or action bias can distort our perception, making careful problem framing essential for clarity and creativity.
  • The piece argues that framing is itself a design act — a practice of staying with uncertainty long enough to cultivate shared understanding and more meaningful outcomes.
Share:The Frame, the Illusion, and the Brief
3 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and