Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Analytics and Tracking ›› A Simple Method to Analyze Task Flow

A Simple Method to Analyze Task Flow

by Khatia Gagnidze
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

This is a simple method to prove to ourselves and the stakeholders that the task flow we just created is worth being implemented.

As designers, we often have to prove to ourselves and the stakeholders that the task flow we just created is worthy of implementation. It’s difficult to find convincing arguments to make them believe that the upgraded flow will be successful (RIP Great ideas).

What is one of the best ways to show the efficiency of a product or functionality? Numbers! To be more specific — ideas validated with data. I found a simple method for such scenarios and share it with you in this article. 

Take a look at the example of the onboarding flow:

 Analyze Task Flow

Onboarding flow

As soon as we have a flow, all the actions that a user will have to take should be written down (Note that these actions can vary depending on the type of flow; there might be gestures, fingerprints, and screens that disappear within a few seconds). In this example, there are four actions provided:

  1. Tap
  2. Type
  3. Open external link
  4. Scroll

Next, we need to evaluate them according to their importance (mental workload), time, and effort spent. For example, Scroll seems to be the easiest task as a user doesn’t have to make a crucial decision — they merely look through the content fast while scrolling. Therefore I assigned it 1 point. It is a very subjective part of the process, so feel free to experiment while evaluating. In my case Tap is 3 points, Type is 5 points, and External link is 10 points (this is the highest because users have to leave the app, which can be dangerous).

Assess the screens

Place signs to identify each action near the corresponding screens:

 Analyze Task Flow

12 Taps / 4 Types / 1 External link / 1 Scroll

Simplify the flow

Now it is time to simplify the flow and count the actions again. I decided to turn the first four screens into one, placed all types of inputs together, and eliminated the number of password input fields. Here is the simplified version of the flow:

 Analyze Task Flow

6 Taps / 3 Types / 1 External link / 1 Scroll

Calculate

As soon as we evaluate initial and updated flows, it is time to open excel and create two pages: one for the initial version and the other for the updated version. Enter simple formulas in the third column (e.x. =B1*3 — in case of taps — the number of taps multiplied by its value).

 Analyze Task Flow

Tap counts =B1*3

As soon as there are formulas entered in the C column, fill in the B column with digits. The total score will appear in the 5th row & C column (enter =SUM(C1:C4 in it to view the result).

 Analyze Task Flow

Working in Excel is optional, you can calculate everything using just pen and paper

Now you can see the results: the updated flow is 37% ((67–42)/67×100=37) simpler than the original one!

When is the method useful?

This method is useful while redesigning a website or an app, and while simplifying the most frequently used flows. Most importantly, as I mentioned above, all the data gathered can enforce your arguments during the negotiations with stakeholders.

post authorKhatia Gagnidze

Khatia Gagnidze
Khatia is a designer with over 6 years of experience in product design, specializing in fintech, eCommerce, blockchain, banking, social network, and other industries. She has successfully designed, UX audited, and conducted research both remotely and on-site for companies worldwide, including in Australia, Singapore, UAE, France, and the USA.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI didn’t just change work — it removed the starting point. This piece explores what happens when early-career jobs vanish, and why the most “future-proof” skills might be the oldest ones.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
AI, Early-Career Jobs, and the Return to Thinking
  • The article illustrates how AI is quickly taking over beginner-level jobs that involve routine work.
  • The piece argues that the skills that remain most valuable are human ones, like critical thinking, communication, big-picture understanding, and ethics.
  • It suggests that companies must decide whether to replace junior staff with AI or use AI to help train and support them.
Share:AI, Early-Career Jobs, and the Return to Thinking
5 min read

Learn when to talk to users, and when to watch them in order to uncover real insights and design experiences that truly work.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
  • The article distinguishes between usability tests and focus groups, highlighting their different roles in UX research.
  • It explains that focus groups gather opinions and attitudes, while usability tests observe real user behavior to find design issues.
  • The piece stresses using each method at the right stage to build the right product and ensure a better user experience.
Share:Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
2 min read

Explore how interaction data uncovers hidden user-behavior patterns that drive smarter product decisions, better UX, and continuous improvement.

Article by Srikanth R
The Power of Interaction Data: Tracking User Behavior in Modern Web Apps
  • The article explains how interaction data like clicks, scrolls, and session patterns reveals real user behavior beyond basic analytics.
  • It shows how tools such as heatmaps and session replays turn this data into actionable insights that improve UX and product decisions.
  • The piece emphasizes using behavioral insights responsibly, balancing optimization with user privacy and ethical data practices.
Share:The Power of Interaction Data: Tracking User Behavior in Modern Web Apps
14 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and