Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Why AI Scaffolding Matters More than Use Cases

Why AI Scaffolding Matters More than Use Cases

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Most organizations are getting AI adoption backwards. Instead of building the foundational scaffolding that makes AI agents work at scale, they chase flashy “big” use cases and set themselves up for failure. In this episode of Invisible Machines, Erika Flowers, who led NASA’s AI Readiness Initiative and has advised Meta, Google, Netflix, and Intuit, joins Robb and Josh for a frank and funny conversation about what’s broken in enterprise AI adoption. 

Organizations often overlook the agent runtime, the infrastructure that allows AI to function reliably across real-world operations. Without it, projects stall, budgets are wasted, and innovation is delayed. Erika shares why most AI initiatives fail before they even reach production and why organizational gaps, not the technology itself, are usually the culprit.

The discussion also looks ahead to a “post-software” era, where AI agents and runtime environments transform enterprise operations. Erika offers practical strategies for moving AI projects from pilot to production, emphasizing human-centered design, rapid iteration, and sustainable deployment.

This insightful conversation dismantles myths about the “big sexy AI use case” while giving leaders, designers, and product teams actionable guidance.

Listen now to discover why AI scaffolding matters and how to close organizational gaps to thrive in a post-software world.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Learn why authentic gamification is rooted in game genres rather than just collecting badges.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 5: Implementation
  • The article says that successful gamification is picking a game genre that fits your app’s core activities and user psychology, building satisfying intrinsic loops before adding extrinsic rewards, and iterating nonstop, and that without these foundations, you don’t have gamification; you have a progress bar that has a terminal point.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 5: Implementation
5 min read

Reveal the three-part kernel that separates real problem framing from simple description.

Article by Morteza Pourmohamadi
A Problem Framing Kernel
  • The piece argues that if you don’t have these three core elements: broadly collecting raw material, connecting elements to surface real tensions, and committing to a point of view, you don’t have a problem frame yet; you have a description.
Share:A Problem Framing Kernel
4 min read

Learn why your badges and streaks won’t wow kids raised on Minecraft.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 4: Special Considerations
  • The piece explains that young users, trained by thousands of hours of expert game design, can smell fake gamification at a hundred paces.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 4: Special Considerations
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and