Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Home ›› How Human Should AI Agents Really Be?

How Human Should AI Agents Really Be?

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

When it comes to design elements for AI agents, few considerations are as weighty and convoluted as anthropomorphization. As we head into the era of conversational machines, renowned science reporter Sophie Bushwick joins Robb and Josh for further explorations of the human-like properties we assign to AI. Sophie’s work reminded us that our introduction to pocket computers came with the heavily anthropomorphized Tamagotchi pets of the late ’90s. In this rousing conversation, she helps weigh the pros and cons of making them human-like across a whole range of scenarios, including those geared toward productivity and entertainment.

We’re already prone to assigning human-like qualities to the many tools and pets in our lives, and with conversational technologies primed to become frequent partners in our daily activities, it’s critical to consider just how human we should make them seem. The correlations and similarities between corporations and AI pose both ethical considerations as well as design challenges, and this conversation draws on Sophie’s extensive background in technology reporting to look for answers.

Currently the Senior News Editor at New Scientist, Sophie has more than a decade of experience covering technology online and in print, with work appearing in places like Discover Magazine, Scientific American, Popular Science, and Gizmodo. She’s also produced numerous podcasts and videos, has made regular TV appearances on “CBS This Morning” and MSNBC. You can listen to her regular appearances on NPR’s Science Friday with Ira Flatow.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Discover how Flux.1, with its groundbreaking 12 billion parameters, sets a new benchmark in AI image generation. This article explores its advancements over Midjourney and Dall-E 3, showcasing its unmatched detail and prompt accuracy. Don’t miss out on seeing how this latest model redefines what’s possible in digital artistry!

Article by Jim Clyde Monge
Flux.1 is a Mind-Blowing Open-Weights AI Image Generator with 12B Parameters
  • This article examines Flux.1’s 12 billion parameters and its advancements over Midjourney and Dall-E 3. Highlights its superior image detail and prompt adherence.
  • The piece explores the shift of developers from Stability AI to Black Forest Labs and how this led to Flux.1. Analyzes the innovation impact.
  • It compares Flux.1 with Midjourney V6, Dall-E 3, and SD3 Ultra, focusing on visual quality, prompt coherence, and diversity.
  • The guide explains how to access Flux.1 via Replicate, HuggingFace, and Fal. Covers the different models—Pro, Dev, Schnell—and their uses.
  • The article investigates Flux.1’s capabilities in generating photorealistic and artistic images with examples of its realism and detailed rendering.
Share:Flux.1 is a Mind-Blowing Open-Weights AI Image Generator with 12B Parameters
5 min read

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and