Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Four Critical Ways GPT-4 is Impacting Enterprise AI Adoption 

Member-only story

Four Critical Ways GPT-4 is Impacting Enterprise AI Adoption 

by Robb Wilson
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

OpenAI’s powerful large language model has accelerated the path toward AI integration and changed the parameters for getting there.

Late last year, when ChatGPT first showed up in everyone’s news feeds, conversations about the business applications for AI instantly intensified. At the very least, every organization had to rethink aspects of their operations that would be affected by this powerful large language model (and others). We’ve been using GPT for over two years in the enterprise solutions being built on the OneReach.ai platform. Seeing the way the public reacted to and began experimenting with ChatGPT was deeply gratifying as someone who has spent the last two decades working toward democratizing conversational AI. Enterprise has been slower to react. I read recently in the Wall Street Journal that of nearly 500 information-technology decision-makers surveyed by Enterprise Technology Research, only 12% said they had plans to use OpenAI technology. 

Business leaders have yet to see that GPT-4 isn’t just another product in their stack. It represents an opportunity to leverage all of their existing software investments behind a conversational user interface. There are already people inside every enterprise who are using GPT for help with daily work-related tasks. If an enterprise doesn’t have a plan for GPT (or at the very least API access to the LLM), their team members are probably using ChatGPT, putting the company at risk of the kinds of data leaks Samsung recently experienced

Here are four important realizations about GPT-4 that I hope will get people thinking differently about this technology.

Become a member to read the whole content.

Become a member
post authorRobb Wilson

Robb Wilson

Robb Wilson is the CEO and co-founder of OneReach.ai, a leading conversational AI platform powering over 1 billion conversations per year. He also co-authored The Wall Street Journal bestselling business book, Age of Invisible Machines. An experience design pioneer with over 20 years of experience working with artificial intelligence, Robb lives with his family in Berkeley, Calif.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • GPT-4 simplifies language model training by enabling conversational training, making traditional natural language understanding approaches obsolete and revolutionizing knowledge management.
  • GPT-4’s low-shot training capabilities pave the way for democratizing AI, eliminating the need for specialized training teams and linguists.
  • The combination of GPT-4 with no-code/low-code development tools empowers enterprises to leverage generative AI for automation and improved customer and employee interactions while accelerating the creation of intelligent digital workers.

Related Articles

What if grieving your AI isn’t a sign of weakness, but proof it truly helped you grow? This article challenges how we think about emotional bonds with machines.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Grieving the Mirror: Informed Attachment as a Measure of AI’s True Utility
  • The article explores how people can form meaningful and healthy emotional connections with AI when they understand what AI is and isn’t.
  • It introduces the Informed Grievability Test — a way to tell if an AI truly helped someone grow by seeing how they feel if they lose access to it.
  • The piece argues that grieving an AI can be a sign of real value, not weakness or confusion, and calls for more user education and less overly protective design that limits emotional depth in AI tools.
Share:Grieving the Mirror: Informed Attachment as a Measure of AI’s True Utility
7 min read

Who pays the real price for AI’s magic? Behind every smart response is a hidden human cost, and it’s time we saw the hands holding the mirror.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The Price of the Mirror: When Silicon Valley Colonizes the Human Soul
  • The article reveals how AI’s human-like responses rely on the invisible labor of low-paid workers who train and moderate these systems.
  • It describes this hidden labor as a form of “cognitive colonialism,” where human judgment is extracted from the Global South for profit.
  • The piece criticizes the tech industry’s ethical posturing, showing how convenience for some is built on the suffering of others.
Share:The Price of the Mirror: When Silicon Valley Colonizes the Human Soul
7 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and