We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine.

The Community Of Over 640,000

Home ›› Design ›› Excerpt From the New Book “Simple and Usable”

Excerpt From the New Book “Simple and Usable”

by Giles Colborne
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

An excerpt about the three types of user encountered in design.

cover of Simple and UsableThis is an excerpt from my new book, Simple and Usable, released this month by Peachpit Press. UX Magazine is also running a giveaway for five copies of the book. If you’d like to purchase the book, visit the book’s page on peachpit.com where it’s available with free shipping with registration.

 

Three types of user

When it comes to simplicity, you can divide users into three types.

Experts are happy to explore your product or service and to push the limits of what it can do. They want never-before-seen technology that is customized for them. Even if they’re new to a product, they have an expert attitude. In other word, they’ll spend time finding out how it works and exploring new features. If you’re making a mobile phone, these are the people who want to be able to browse through the mobile phone’s file system and tweak everything. It turns out there are relatively few of these people.

I call the next group willing adopters. They probably use some similar products or services. They’re tempted to use something more sophisticated, but they’re not comfortable playing with something entirely new— they need to be given easy ways to adopt new features. For instance, they might be interested in a more sophisticated phone, but only if they can transfer their precious contacts easily. There are fewer of these people than you’d imagine and their tolerance for learning is pretty low.

The vast majority of people are mainstreamers. They don’t use technology for its own sake; they use it to get a job done. They tend to learn a few key features and never add to their repertoire. These are the people who say, “I just want my mobile phone to work.” Most people fall into this group.

It’s tempting to think that after a while people graduate from one group to another. But that hardly ever happens. Even after years of using a product, people tend to stay in the same group.

For example, take any large group of people who’ve been using Microsoft Excel for five years. You’ll find some people who’ve explored settings and options, some who’ve got a few specialist features set up to do what they like, and others who just use it for adding up columns of figures.

It has more to do with their underlying attitude toward technology than the amount of time they spend using a product or service.

It’s tempting to design for the first two groups—they’re easier to please. But experiences that feel simple are designed for the mainstreamers.

Diagram of types of users
Expert users are a minority. In 2009, complex cameras like SLRs comprised only 9 percent of the digital camera market (source: CIPA).

Why you should ignore your expert customers

Most companies spend too much time listening to their expert customers—the ones who spend the most time using their products or services—because they’re easy to talk to. Expert customers are enthusiasts, they’re vocal and opinionated about how to improve what’s on offer.

But experts aren’t typical customers and their judgement is often skewed. They don’t experience the problems that mainstream customers have.

And they want things that mainstream customers don’t care about.

Here’s what one responder on Slashdot (a blog run by experts and enthusiasts) had to say when the iPod was announced: “No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.”

Another commenter wrote: “I don’t see many sales in the future of iPod.”

Commenters on another enthusiast blog, MacRumors, also wanted more: “I still can’t believe this! All this hype for something so ridiculous! Who cares about an MP3 player?”

Apple’s expert customers wanted a flying car. Apple’s mainstream customers just wanted an MP3 player that worked.

I see this again an again: a small group of customers make noisy, persistent demands for new features that are too complicated for typical users.

You’ll find it hard to convince your stakeholders (who are insiders, and therefore, experts) that the customers who are also experts (just like them) are not the ones you should listen to. After all, your best customers spend a lot of time and money per head; they ‘get’ what you do, and they speak your languages; they they’re so reasonable—if you ask them to upgrade to the latest version, they do it without hesitating.

But if you listen to them first, you’ll create products that are too complex for mainstream customers to use.

As of January 2010, Apple had sold 240,000,000 iPods and no flying cars.

So if your stakeholders are trying to create a mass-markey product by listening to their expert customers, remind them of this story. Sometimes, it’s best to ignore your expert customers.

Absurd flying car
Experts often want features that would horrify mainstreamers.

 

Simple and Usable was released this month by Peachpit Press. UX Magazine is also running a giveaway for five copies of the book. If you’d like to purchase the book, visit the book’s page on peachpit.com where it’s available with free shipping with registration.

post authorGiles Colborne

Giles Colborne, Giles has been working in usability and user-centred design since 1991. He formed cxpartners with Richard Caddick in 2004 focusing on creating outstanding user experiences and measurable changes to projects and products. Giles is a former President of the UK Usability Professionals’ Association and now sits on their Global Advisory Committee and international Conference Committee. He has worked with British Standards Institute in developing guidance on web accessibility. Giles is a highly-rated speaker at events around the world, and has also published the book Simple and Usable (Peachpit Press, 2010). Follow him on Twitter @gilescolborne.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Building effective partnerships with PMs requires stepping outside of any frustration, ego, or resentment at being ignored, and building empathy. How to do that? Here is what we’re going to find out.

How To Research So PMs Will Listen
  • PMs are the most critical audiences for research, they are also often the hardest to convince, and the source of many of researchers’ frustrations and heartaches.
  • Building effective partnerships with PMs requires stepping outside of any frustration, ego, or resentment at being ignored, and building empathy.
  • The author shares:
    • Some practices of working with PMs
    • Questions to ask PMs and stakeholders
  • The baseline expectation setting:
    • Level set
    • Set guardrails based on your role
    • Ask for candid feedback and engagement
    • No surprises
  • When researchers and PMs are in conflict or in separate silos, neither role gets the value of the other, but strong researcher-pm partnerships can be game-changing for extending the strategic impact and influence of both design and research.
Share:How To Research So PMs Will Listen
6 min read
How to research so PMs will listen
How To Empower An Organization Through Design?
  • The author believes that the following reasons are why design/branding/marketing agencies end up damaging the image of design as a tool for getting results:
    • Lots of jargon and little to no action at a fundamental level.
    • Large companies with “foolproof” processes.
    • Fake cases and invented touch points
    • Romanticized view of consumers
  • In order to centralize an organization, designers need to map its interdependence relationships and understand how a project can strengthen all sectors in an equal way.
Share:How To Empower An Organization Through Design?
4 min read
How to empower an organization through design?

And, Is OneReach Under The Radar By Design?

Is OneReach AI The Tesla Of Conversational AI?
  • The author gives his perspective on OneReach.ai as the top scorer in the Gartner 2022 report.
  • The author believes OneReach.ai to be one of the most granular no-code environments that support an exceptional degree of fine tuning.
  • The author refers to the platform as an orchestration canvas, where multiple processes can be orchestrated for multi-dimensional customer service, and gives some details on how the platform works as a single front-door for customers.
  • Cobus Greyling explores two cautions from Gartner about the OneReach.ai platform.
  • He concludes that voice is a strength of OneReach.ai and the company has extreme focus on customer experience, and orchestrating experiences
Share:Is OneReach AI The Tesla Of Conversational AI?
4 min read
Is OneReach AI The Tesla Of Conversational AI?

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and