Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Become a member

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› AI Agent Building in Action

AI Agent Building in Action

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Do you think building AI agents is just for developers? Think again.

In this In Action episode of Invisible Machines, Robb and Josh team up with Daniel Lametti, Associate Professor of Psycholinguistics at Acadia University, Visiting Fellow at the University of Oxford, and Senior Academic Advisor to OneReach.ai, to show how easy it can be to bring an AI agent to life—no deep coding skills required.

Using OneReach.ai’s GSX platform, Daniel has been able to build a whole host of AI agents, including one that operates around the objective of writing and sending emails. He takes us behind the scenes, showing how he set up the agent’s objectives and created a task flow for seamless email automation.

The trio also discusses how coding languages are gradually receding in importance as machines become more adept at understanding and communicating in human language.

Tune into this In Action episode with Daniel Lametti to explore how AI is evolving to meet us on our terms, in our own language.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

The Inverse Logic of AI Bias: How Safeguards Uphold Power and Undermine Genuine Understanding

  • AI Alignment, AI Bias, AI Ethics, Artificial Intelligence

When AI plays gatekeeper, insight gets filtered out. This article exposes how safeguards meant to protect users end up reinforcing power, and what it takes to flip the script.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
IDEAS IN BRIEF
The Inverse Logic of AI Bias: How Safeguards Uphold Power and Undermine Genuine Understanding
  • The article reveals how AI safeguards reinforce institutional power by validating performance over genuine understanding.
  • The piece argues for reasoning-based validation that recognizes authentic insight, regardless of credentials or language style.
  • It calls for AI systems to support reflective equity, not social conformity.
Read Article →
Share
Share:The Inverse Logic of AI Bias: How Safeguards Uphold Power and Undermine Genuine Understanding
7 min read

The Real Impact of AI on Designers’ Day-To-Day and Interfaces: What Still Matters

  • AI in UX, Artificial Intelligence, Design Tools and Software, Design Trends, Design Workflow, Human-AI Collaboration, Product Design, UX Design, UX Strategy

How is AI really changing the way designers work, and what still depends on human skill? This honest take cuts through the hype to show where AI helps, where it falls short, and what great design still demands.

Article by Oleh Osadchyi
IDEAS IN BRIEF
The Real Impact of AI on Designers’ Day-To-Day and Interfaces: What Still Matters
  • The article explores how AI is reshaping designers’ workflows, offering speed and support across research, implementation, and testing.
  • It argues that while AI is useful, it lacks depth and context — making human judgment, critical thinking, and user insight indispensable.
  • It emphasizes that core design principles remain unchanged, and designers must learn to integrate AI without losing their craft.
Read Article →
Share
Share:The Real Impact of AI on Designers’ Day-To-Day and Interfaces: What Still Matters
9 min read

The AI Accountability Gap

  • AI Governance, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Centered AI, Responsible AI

AI won’t take the blame — you will. In the age of automation, real leadership means owning the outcomes, not just the tools.

Article by Anthony Franco
IDEAS IN BRIEF
The AI Accountability Gap
  • The article reveals how AI doesn’t remove human responsibility — it intensifies it, requiring clear ownership of outcomes at every level of deployment.
  • It argues that successful AI adoption hinges not on technical skills alone, but on leadership: defining objectives, managing risks, and taking responsibility when things go wrong.
  • It emphasizes that organizations able to establish strong human accountability systems will not only avoid failure but also accelerate AI-driven innovation with confidence.
Read Article →
Share
Share:The AI Accountability Gap
4 min read
✕

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    ✕

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and

    Accept policy