Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› 5 Predictions for Agentic AI in 2026

5 Predictions for Agentic AI in 2026

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

As 2025 comes to a close, Invisible Machines hosts Robb Wilson and Josh Tyson revisit the conversations that shaped this year and outline the forces about to redefine agentic AI in 2026. Their message is clear: next year will challenge long-held assumptions about how organizations operate, how investors evaluate value, and how consumers interact with technology.

Several disruptive trends are converging at once. Outbound AI is rapidly shifting into the hands of consumers, unlocking powerful new modes of automation and communication. Organizations are beginning to adopt agent runtime environments — systems that allow AI agents to be deployed, orchestrated, and scaled like real operational infrastructure. These environments have the potential to transform everything from customer service to internal workflows.

Robb and Josh break down the emerging components of a runtime, offering glimpses of what “AI-native” companies may look like by the end of next year. Their predictions include seismic changes in the expectations investors place on businesses: the ability to operationalize agentic AI won’t be a competitive advantage, it will be the baseline.

The episode also previews conversations with returning guests Ben Goertzel of SingularityNET and Joshua Gans, co-author of Prediction Machines, signaling a year of even deeper inquiry ahead.

If you’re shaping strategy in an AI-accelerated world, this episode offers clarity you can use today. Listen now to dive in.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

What makes players keep coming back? This piece explores the psychology of hot streaks — how momentum, perception, and smart design can turn short wins into lasting engagement.

Article by Montgomery Singman
The Psychology of Hot Streak Game Design: How to Keep Players Coming Back Every Day Without Shame
  • The article shows how hot streaks tap into players’ psychology, turning momentum into motivation.
  • It highlights the hot-hand fallacy, where players overestimate their chances of continued success.
  • The piece argues that ethical streak design should enhance engagement without exploiting addictive behavior.
Share:The Psychology of Hot Streak Game Design: How to Keep Players Coming Back Every Day Without Shame
26 min read

Trusting AI isn’t the goal — relying on it is. This article explores why human trust and AI reliance are worlds apart, and what UX designers should focus on to make AI feel dependable, not human.

Article by Verena Seibert-Giller
The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
  • The article argues that “reliance,” not “trust,” is the right way to think about users’ relationship with AI.
  • It explains that human trust and AI reliance are driven by different psychological mechanisms.
  • The piece highlights that predictability, transparency, and control make users more willing to rely on AI.
  • It concludes that users don’t need to trust AI as a partner — only rely on it as a dependable tool.
Share:The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
4 min read

What if your productivity app could keep you as focused as your favorite game? This article explores how game design psychology can transform everyday tools into experiences that spark flow, focus, and real engagement.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Flow State Design: Applying Game Psychology to Productivity Apps
  • The article shows how principles from game design can help productivity tools create and sustain a flow state.
  • It explains that games succeed by balancing challenge and skill, providing clear goals, and offering immediate feedback — elements most productivity apps lack.
  • The piece argues that applying these psychological insights could make work tools more engaging, adaptive, and motivating.
Share:Flow State Design: Applying Game Psychology to Productivity Apps
12 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and