Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› The Government Already Knows the Fax Machines Don’t Work

The Government Already Knows the Fax Machines Don’t Work

by UX Magazine Staff
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Jennifer Pahlka on why fixing government isn’t a technology problem — and how AI might finally make it tractable.

Nobody required the carbon copies.

That’s the punchline of a story Jennifer Pahlka tells about a state DMV. A colleague was going through a service process with a public servant that involved, among other anachronisms, actual carbon copy forms. She kept asking: why are we doing this? The answer was always the same: the other agency requires it. Someone had tried for years to change it. They’d never gotten anywhere.

So the colleague went to the other agency. She found their intake process. She worked her way to the right person and asked: why do you require the carbon copies?

“We hate this,” they said. “The other agency just keeps sending them.”

Both sides of a broken process, each convinced the other was the immovable object. Neither was. The carbon copies existed entirely in the space between two organizations that had stopped talking to each other about why they were doing what they were doing.

Jennifer Pahlka has spent fifteen years in and around government collecting these stories. She wrote Recoding America, founded Code for America, and served as Deputy CTO for Government Innovation in the Obama White House. The carbon copy story isn’t an outlier in her experience. It’s the pattern.

Jennifer is working on the gap between what government is supposed to do and what it actually does. In this conversation, Robb, Josh, and Jennifer go deep on what’s actually broken and what it would take to fix it.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Learn how the smallest design decisions, a default checkbox, a colored button, and a progress bar, have the biggest ethical weight.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
The Psychology of Nudges: Why the Smallest Design Element Can Shift the Biggest Outcomes
  • The piece draws a sharp line between nudges and dark patterns by asking one question: who benefits, the user or the platform? Same tools, opposite ethics.
Share:The Psychology of Nudges: Why the Smallest Design Element Can Shift the Biggest Outcomes
6 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and