Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Exploring Organizational AGI

Exploring Organizational AGI

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

How do AI agents fit into a strategy for increasing a business’s longevity? Imagine having a conversational operating system for your organization that is always learning. The advanced orchestration of AI agents can create a broader technology ecosystem, setting a trajectory for organizational artificial general intelligence (OAGI).

In broad terms, artificial general intelligence, or AGI, refers to a system of artificial intelligence that meets or surpasses human capabilities across a wide range of cognitive tasks. General intelligence is what has enabled humans to adapt to a diverse array of environments on Earth. Replicating this versatile and complex intelligence is a daunting challenge. However, the level of general intelligence required to run portions of a business is much narrower and far more feasible.

In a recent episode of Invisible Machines, Robb Wilson, CEO and co-founder of OneReach.ai, who coined the term ‘OAGI’, is joined by co-host Josh Tyson and Executive Producer Elias Parker for a forward-looking exploration of this important adaptation to the concept of OAGI.

With the lifespan of companies across industries in sharp decline, organizational AGI offers a promising opportunity to boost their agility and help companies adapt to survive and thrive. 

Don’t miss this expansive look at the future of business.

Subscribe to make sure you don’t miss our upcoming continuation of this conversation, wherein we’re joined by a senior partner at McKinsey to discuss the longevity, health, and agility of companies and organizational AGI.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Discover how human-centered UX design is transforming medtech by cutting costs, reducing errors, and driving better outcomes for clinicians, patients, and healthcare providers alike.

Article by Dennis Lenard
How UX Design is Revolutionising Medtech Cost Efficiency
  • The article explains how strategic UX design in medtech improves cost efficiency by enhancing usability, reducing training time, and minimizing user errors across clinical workflows.
  • The piece argues that intuitive, user-centered interfaces boost productivity, adoption rates, and patient outcomes while lowering support costs and extending product lifecycles, making UX a crucial investment for sustainable growth and ROI in healthcare technology.
Share:How UX Design is Revolutionising Medtech Cost Efficiency
7 min read

Discover how the future of AI runs on purpose-built infrastructure.

Article by UX Magazine Staff
AI Agent Runtimes in Dedicated Lanes: Lessons from China’s EV Roads
  • The article states that AI’s progress depends less on creating larger models and more on developing specialized “lanes” (agent runtimes) where AI can run safely and efficiently.
  • It argues that, like China’s EV-only highways, these runtimes are designed for smooth flow, constant energy (through memory and context), and safe, reliable operation, much like EV-only highways in China.
  • The piece concludes that building this kind of infrastructure takes effort and oversight, but it enables AI systems to work together, grow, and improve sustainably.
Share:AI Agent Runtimes in Dedicated Lanes: Lessons from China’s EV Roads
4 min read

Learn when to talk to users, and when to watch them in order to uncover real insights and design experiences that truly work.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
  • The article distinguishes between usability tests and focus groups, highlighting their different roles in UX research.
  • It explains that focus groups gather opinions and attitudes, while usability tests observe real user behavior to find design issues.
  • The piece stresses using each method at the right stage to build the right product and ensure a better user experience.
Share:Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
2 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and