Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Home ›› Digital Twins in an Agentic World

Digital Twins in an Agentic World

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Digital twins are critical to the orchestration of AI agents, providing the context they need to create meaningful experiences quickly and efficiently. Robb and Josh welcome Dr. Michael Grieves to the Invisible Machines podcast for a conversation about the origins of the concept, which he developed while working with NASA in the 1970s. The architecture required for orchestrating AI agents relies on different types of digital twins that might emerge within an organization, touching on physical elements, temporal data, and collections of unstructured data.

Dr. Grieves comes ready to explore these connections, drawing from his book Product Lifecycle Management as well as his experience with digital twins in manufacturing space, in the metaverse, and in simulations, as well as his numerous academic publications. The trio also discusses how something Michael calls “retirementitus” prevents organizations from embracing the sweeping technologies surrounding AI and digital twins.

Along with writing the seminal book Product Lifecycle Management and a seminal article on digital twins for The Economist, Dr. Grieves has consulted for top global organizations, including Boeing, Unilever, Newport News Shipbuilding, and General Motors. He has been a senior executive at both Fortune 1000 companies and entrepreneurial organizations and has served on the boards of public companies in the United States, China, and Japan. Dr. Grieves and Robb have both led projects with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and have piloted a Boeing 787 simulator.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Discover how Flux.1, with its groundbreaking 12 billion parameters, sets a new benchmark in AI image generation. This article explores its advancements over Midjourney and Dall-E 3, showcasing its unmatched detail and prompt accuracy. Don’t miss out on seeing how this latest model redefines what’s possible in digital artistry!

Article by Jim Clyde Monge
Flux.1 is a Mind-Blowing Open-Weights AI Image Generator with 12B Parameters
  • This article examines Flux.1’s 12 billion parameters and its advancements over Midjourney and Dall-E 3. Highlights its superior image detail and prompt adherence.
  • The piece explores the shift of developers from Stability AI to Black Forest Labs and how this led to Flux.1. Analyzes the innovation impact.
  • It compares Flux.1 with Midjourney V6, Dall-E 3, and SD3 Ultra, focusing on visual quality, prompt coherence, and diversity.
  • The guide explains how to access Flux.1 via Replicate, HuggingFace, and Fal. Covers the different models—Pro, Dev, Schnell—and their uses.
  • The article investigates Flux.1’s capabilities in generating photorealistic and artistic images with examples of its realism and detailed rendering.
Share:Flux.1 is a Mind-Blowing Open-Weights AI Image Generator with 12B Parameters
5 min read

Is true consciousness in computers a possibility, or merely a fantasy? The article delves into the philosophical and scientific debates surrounding the nature of consciousness and its potential in AI. Explore why modern neuroscience and AI fall short of creating genuine awareness, the limits of current technology, and the profound philosophical questions that challenge our understanding of mind and machine. Discover why the pursuit of conscious machines might be more about myth than reality.

Article by Peter D'Autry
Why Computers Can’t Be Conscious
  • The article examines why computers, despite advancements, cannot achieve consciousness like humans. It challenges the assumption that mimicking human behavior equates to genuine consciousness.
  • It critiques the reductionist approach of equating neural activity with consciousness and argues that the “hard problem” of consciousness remains unsolved. The piece also discusses the limitations of both neuroscience and AI in addressing this problem.
  • The article disputes the notion that increasing complexity in AI will lead to consciousness, highlighting that understanding and experience cannot be solely derived from computational processes.
  • It emphasizes the importance of physical interaction and the lived experience in consciousness, arguing that AI lacks the embodied context necessary for genuine understanding and consciousness.
Share:Why Computers Can’t Be Conscious
18 min read

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and