ARTICLE NO. 18    December 19, 2005

First Beta Launch

Here we go then. After months of working in the few crumbs of spare-time that we could scrape up we’ve finally done it and launched UX Magazine. We’re pleased with a lot of it but also know that a lot of work still needs to be done; a lot.

First off, we’re trying to remain XHTML strict and are avoiding hacks best we can but IE still misbehaves here and there. Annoying, yes, but the site works well enough to be released into the general population. There are certainly some bugs in other browsers here and there. Ah, the joys of web-development.

Secondly, We have a list of stuff to do before we can be certain that this site is truly user friendly. The tool tips on the Link Pool and the Feeds aren’t quite there yet. We need to make the preview text of articles clearer and some features are just plain missing.

Last but not least, we’re not happy. We never are. Never ever. We look at things and go “bah!”—out loud, numerous times a day. We just had to stop being so bloody picky and launch the damn thing. But that doesn’t mean we’re not going to fix these things. So while we’re excited about launching the site, we’ll probably never be 100% happy with it, and that’s the way it should be.

In the meantime, please comment (right here) on things you love, hate, are puzzled by. We’ve probably missed shed loads of important stuff so help us make UX Magazine what you want it to be.

UPDATE (19/12/05): We’ve applied a nasty hack and “fixed” some IE bug which just won’t go away otherwise. This is just band-aid but it will have to do for now. We’re also killing off the tool tips we had as we were getting too many issues with them. Shame because they were damn pretty.

UPDATE (20/12/05): Latest changes include a lot of stuff noticed by our visitors (thank you very much).

  1. We removed the email link from all our commenter’s. Now only a web link will be applied, if entered. (noticed by Alex Casanova)
  2. Fixed the home page a bit, still needs work though. Added the TextPattern credits (question asked by Roshambo)
  3. Changed the tabindex on the comment forms. Now it works as it should. (thanks Greg)
  4. The last update info in the SnapShot box on the Home page, now displays the actual last update time, including the comments.
  5. And last but not least, it seems Del.icio.us is back up, so now you can also see our Link Pool list on the home Page.

UPDATE (20/12/05) Part Deux: Got some new tabs done as the older ones where accused of being, well, rather crap. You can check out their dark chromed goodness by look at the top bar; ooh, shiny… CMD fixed some CSS stuff I broke while hacking away to get IE to bloody work. He also added a smooooth “back to top” at the bottom of every article. We’re working on a better way of integrating that into the design.

UPDATE (21/12/05): We’ve merged the search and tabs and fixed some issues in the process. With Christmas approaching fast, we’re scrambling to fix as much as possible before we’re all off for the holidays. IE unfortunately still misbehaves. The feedback and exposure we’ve been getting has been tremendous, which kind of freaks me out because there’s still so much to do. It’s 4am, I’m going to bed. Thanks for dropping by.

UPDATE (23/12/05): We’ve been very busy trying to get most of your comments into our layout. All of your remarks, complaints and praises have been very helpful. So to keep this note short, here’s what we’ve done so far:

  1. We’ve cleaned up our CSS. If anyone tries to validate it, they will get an error. It’s an ugly hack we’ve added, but will get rid of it shortly.
  2. We added more informative page titles.
  3. We finalized the “tab” & “search” design.
  4. We removed the horizontal scroll bar. The full fix will come when we get around to restructuring the whole site… Should be right after Xmas holidays.

 

UPDATE (23/12/05) Part Deux: Just got around to changing the descriptive text on all articles. The excerpt is now properly displayed.
Also please forgive us if you’ve been receiving one-too-many RSS updates on our articles. We’ve been fidgeting with the Feed a bit… until we get things sorted.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

Comments

Add a new comment

Because of problems with spam comments, HTML in comments is not permitted. URLs are allowed, but they will not be rendered as clickable links.
Addendum to that last post about the word “window” being cut off. I had my font size up one level…. All the words are visible at default font size.
I think it would make more sense if the “Design”, “Tech” and “Strategy” buttons were full color to begin with so that they connected immediately with their respective icons.

Having to mouse over them to see the connection is an unnecessary additional step.
Mark: VERY good point and one I will look into as we get out of beta. I am kind of contemplating getting rid of colour coding altogether and switch to a clearer taging system for the articles. Never happy.
It appears as thou on a dialup connection, the body text takes several seconds to align central to the parent div. Maybe the css for this is too low in the markup, thus loading later?

Great site. Nice and elegant. Entries are to the pint and not hyped up. Information as it is ;)
Is it just me or does http://www.mutationevent.com/ seem to look a lot like UXmag…
To follow-up on Mark’s comment:

a) You should really have a key for those D/T/S icons, (or just go with Mark’s suggestion.)

b) And even if you do go with Mark’s suggestion, the colors of the icons match up with the colors of the RSS, XHTML, CSS buttons at the bottom of the page. So when someone IS looking for a key, that’s all they see. Which is confusing. So you might consider switching something up.
I think you guys need to go back to the drawing board in terms of UI and layout. It took me 10 minutes to find the primary navigation. I tried clicking on the steve jobs quote, then his picture, I clicked on that green ad in the middle, didn’t even notice it was an add. There is no hierchy to your site. You don’t even have a proper H1 or H2 tag in your source. There is no sense of what is a link, how important the link is, or how to navigate. I’m sorry if I’m being critical, but this website breaks all the rules of UI for no reason, it isn’t like the site even looks special. It looks like a newspaper on a website and it isn’t even a good looking newspaper layout. Try again.
Try Validome.org to validate the site. There’s a minor bug regarding the onsubmit event handler with a missing meta tag stating the correct Content-Script-Type
love the way you guys structured and styled this site for print. I love printing interesting articles, and this site got heaps!

eh heck, I love everything bout this site. Great stuff guys!!
I just found a romanian “webdesigner” Cristian Tirsan that has on his portofolio a website(http://www.poloexpo.ro/) that is 90% identical to this one. His portofolio si avaiable at http://mdma.pcnation.ro/ He is working for this company Q-design Software http://www.qdesign.ro/
Arthos, ur talking #$%@… 90% identical? I had a look at both of them, but that poloexpo just seem to be a little inspired. U cannot call that a rip.
can you please remove the 508 accessibility sign?

your website is not accessible and readable for people who are blind and visual impaired! I use mozilla firefox so I can overwrite internet explorer’s and your websites forced use of small fonts. 30% of your webpage is not readable with bigger fonts (arial 16).

it could be very intresting website if I could read it!

a very angry and very anoyed pheloxi feeling disciminated by small fonts.
Pheloxi: We are constantly trying to figure out new ways of making UXMag friendlier and more accessible while retaining its visual appeal. I also appreciate and agree with the the fact that currently the compliance buttons aren’t entirely representative of the site’s overall performance and this is something we are looking at very seriously. I apologize for the difficulties you have experienced.
How can access your RSS feed directly without going to feeburner. I have my own reader that can parse the XML file.
James: Hello James, we’re routing our feed through FeedBurner in order to track it’s results. You can use our feed from the link we provide just as you would any other direct RSS feed.
Hey Guys, I wrote a review of this site with some suggestions. I would like to hear your opinion about it.
Case Study UX Magazine – When Good Design Is Poor Usability
I applaud your efforts. It’s no secret that the usability engineering crowd is a tough audience to design for. No kidding! You’ll have critics waiting in line to tell you which principles you’ve violated at every turn. The reality is that this audience routinely frequents many notable UX gurus blogs or web sites that are not all that interesting visually, but usable, which is usually the point.

The point – What is the point? That the question. Is it simply to attempt to create a visually interesting format in which to discuss this field, or do you a really have something to say? I find the concept of UX as an on-line magazine compelling. However, when I look at it to try to discern what is your particular angle on this field or your unique contribution, it seems very fuzzy and undefined. After browsing and reading/skimming some articles, I still don’t know. Is it me?
I applaud your efforts. It’s no secret that the usability engineering crowd is a tough audience to design for. No kidding! You’ll have critics waiting in line to tell you which principles you’ve violated at every turn. The reality is that this audience routinely frequents many notable UX gurus blogs or web sites that are not all that interesting visually, but usable, which is usually the point.

The point – What is the point? That the question. Is it simply to attempt to create a visually interesting format in which to discuss this field, or do you a really have something to say? I find the concept of UX as an on-line magazine compelling. However, when I look at it to try to discern what is your particular angle on this field or your unique contribution, it seems very fuzzy and undefined. After browsing and reading/skimming some articles, I still don’t know. Is it me?
Hey Guys, I wrote a review of this site with some suggestions. I would like to hear your opinion about it.
Case Study UX Magazine – When Good Design Is Poor Usability
James: Hello James, we’re routing our feed through FeedBurner in order to track it’s results. You can use our feed from the link we provide just as you would any other direct RSS feed.
How can access your RSS feed directly without going to feeburner. I have my own reader that can parse the XML file.
Pheloxi: We are constantly trying to figure out new ways of making UXMag friendlier and more accessible while retaining its visual appeal. I also appreciate and agree with the the fact that currently the compliance buttons aren’t entirely representative of the site’s overall performance and this is something we are looking at very seriously. I apologize for the difficulties you have experienced.
can you please remove the 508 accessibility sign?

your website is not accessible and readable for people who are blind and visual impaired! I use mozilla firefox so I can overwrite internet explorer’s and your websites forced use of small fonts. 30% of your webpage is not readable with bigger fonts (arial 16).

it could be very intresting website if I could read it!

a very angry and very anoyed pheloxi feeling disciminated by small fonts.
Arthos, ur talking #$%@… 90% identical? I had a look at both of them, but that poloexpo just seem to be a little inspired. U cannot call that a rip.
I just found a romanian “webdesigner” Cristian Tirsan that has on his portofolio a website(http://www.poloexpo.ro/) that is 90% identical to this one. His portofolio si avaiable at http://mdma.pcnation.ro/ He is working for this company Q-design Software http://www.qdesign.ro/